• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.
New posts

bob1

Beach Fanatic
Jun 26, 2010
530
523
Please explain how BFO’s are costing you and others money?

By legally defending their property rights PROVIDED BY WALTON COUNTY.?!
I doubt you are oblivious to the the obvious lawyer fees, you are taking time of county employees like code enforcement and sheriff, diverting attention from business we should be doing, wasting time and money. If you are concerned about property rights then there are betterways to spend your time. You have no rights to destroy dunes. It is against humanity's interest and stains your soul. Sea level rise and hurricanes are mother nature's revenge and you will suffer!
 

SUP View

Beach Lover
Jul 22, 2019
51
43
Above Water
I doubt you are oblivious to the the obvious lawyer fees, you are taking time of county employees like code enforcement and sheriff, diverting attention from business we should be doing, wasting time and money. If you are concerned about property rights then there are betterways to spend your time. You have no rights to destroy dunes. It is against humanity's interest and stains your soul. Sea level rise and hurricanes are mother nature's revenge and you will suffer!

FACTS:

- The County, "influenced" by SJW locals for the most part, initiated the legal action that is taking place. So I take it you are OK with the County spending millions of taxpayer monies on this suit that may take years to end. I am not. The BFO's are funding the legal fees on both sides.

- There was NO EFFORT made by the WCC to meet, negotiate, discuss, etc.. with BFO's to reach a common ground or solution to their perception of a problem. Mr. Huckabee offered an option for discussion that was NEVER considered by the WCC. Why?

- You must not have a problem with 50% of Public Beach areas "reserved" for vendors to operate. If so, let the WCC know that. There really is very little issue of beach sand availability for public use through the year. It is THE FRONT ROW AVAILABILITY that leads to people moving on to private property areas.

- I personally am always aware and respectful of EVERYONE'S property rights. Are you? And I agree with you that there are better ways to spend my time than fighting for my own personal property. And I will as soon as this ridiculousness is over.

- Regarding my beachfront property, at my cost, fencing and native grasses have been in place and nourished by local professionals. And I will continue to do all in my power to keep the dunes in great shape. As do all the other BFO's I know.

- As I have noted here previously, members of both the TDC and WCC have stated to me there is a "bigger problem with parking than beach availability". True statement.

- And why isn't there more promotion of the MILES of public beach available? Plenty of parking, bathroom access, ease of entry, etc.....

- Progressives are typically not interested, nor respectful, of facts. They rather drive their wants / needs on emotional issues that are for "the common man". They typically do not have any interest in a workable solution to an issue and will fan the flames of public sentiment to try and reach their goal - "just give me what I want and all is fine". Does it bother you, or any CU supporter, that the WCC made no effort to "work" with the BFO's on this issue? What is in it for the WCC's?

- I am open to a workable solution - no question. And I will also defend my property rights every day when others try to take away what is legally mine.


Throughout this whole issue, what is discussed on this forum and in the 30A area, I have yet to hear a CU supporter come up with ACTUAL FACTS to support their position. It is ALWAYS their opinion.


Maybe today is a good day for that to start.
 

bob1

Beach Fanatic
Jun 26, 2010
530
523
FACTS:

- The County, "influenced" by SJW locals for the most part, initiated the legal action that is taking place. So I take it you are OK with the County spending millions of taxpayer monies on this suit that may take years to end. I am not. The BFO's are funding the legal fees on both sides.

- There was NO EFFORT made by the WCC to meet, negotiate, discuss, etc.. with BFO's to reach a common ground or solution to their perception of a problem. Mr. Huckabee offered an option for discussion that was NEVER considered by the WCC. Why?

- You must not have a problem with 50% of Public Beach areas "reserved" for vendors to operate. If so, let the WCC know that. There really is very little issue of beach sand availability for public use through the year. It is THE FRONT ROW AVAILABILITY that leads to people moving on to private property areas.

- I personally am always aware and respectful of EVERYONE'S property rights. Are you? And I agree with you that there are better ways to spend my time than fighting for my own personal property. And I will as soon as this ridiculousness is over.

- Regarding my beachfront property, at my cost, fencing and native grasses have been in place and nourished by local professionals. And I will continue to do all in my power to keep the dunes in great shape. As do all the other BFO's I know.

- As I have noted here previously, members of both the TDC and WCC have stated to me there is a "bigger problem with parking than beach availability". True statement.

- And why isn't there more promotion of the MILES of public beach available? Plenty of parking, bathroom access, ease of entry, etc.....

- Progressives are typically not interested, nor respectful, of facts. They rather drive their wants / needs on emotional issues that are for "the common man". They typically do not have any interest in a workable solution to an issue and will fan the flames of public sentiment to try and reach their goal - "just give me what I want and all is fine". Does it bother you, or any CU supporter, that the WCC made no effort to "work" with the BFO's on this issue? What is in it for the WCC's?

- I am open to a workable solution - no question. And I will also defend my property rights every day when others try to take away what is legally mine.


Throughout this whole issue, what is discussed on this forum and in the 30A area, I have yet to hear a CU supporter come up with ACTUAL FACTS to support their position. It is ALWAYS their opinion.


Maybe today is a good day for that to start.
Regardless of lawyers and deeds and legal. Beachfront owners get more feces on them every time you post. :spin:

Keep digging you will be buried in sand up to your neck soon and the temperature is rising and the crabs will find you.
 

SUP View

Beach Lover
Jul 22, 2019
51
43
Above Water
Regardless of lawyers and deeds and legal. Beachfront owners get more feces on them every time you post. :spin:

Keep digging you will be buried in sand up to your neck soon and the temperature is rising and the crabs will find you.

Very classy.

Thanks for helping to prove my points.
 

BlueMtnBeachVagrant

Beach Fanatic
Jun 20, 2005
1,305
386
Remember, @SUP View, there are not prerequisites for posting on this forum. And it sometimes really shows. Good post, BTW.

Seems like us BPOs are dropping like files on this forum. Oh well, we’ll still have our DAY(s) in court much to the FEAR of FBFA and their supporters. And I still believe the outcome will be the same regardless of the CU zealots’ actions.

There’s not a chance in hell that you, I or any other private property owner defending their property against this RIDICULOUS customary use attempt at property theft will convince any CU supporter that maybe they are supporting an unjust cause, especially considering they want something for nothing.

Maybe that’s why a socialist candidate is surprising a lot of us. But I digress.

My main concern is the slander perpetuated by some extremists who obviously doesn’t give a flying freak what many good, upstanding and respected citizens feel about their methods, motivations and ultimately them. And basically that’s why I started this thread. And I’m not disappointed with the replies of the usual suspects this far.

I guess FBFA will try to shame the super majority of the Senate and Representatives in Tallahassee into changing their minds and allow the Walton BCC to have their way as they see fit....Constitution be damned (due process). Gosh I hope they see the charade for what it is...a brighter spotlight on those who greatly desire it.
 

Poppaj

SoWal Insider
Oct 9, 2015
8,149
19,906
Remember, @SUP View, there are not prerequisites for posting on this forum. And it sometimes really shows. Good post, BTW.

Seems like us BPOs are dropping like files on this forum. Oh well, we’ll still have our DAY(s) in court much to the FEAR of FBFA and their supporters. And I still believe the outcome will be the same regardless of the CU zealots’ actions.

There’s not a chance in hell that you, I or any other private property owner defending their property against this RIDICULOUS customary use attempt at property theft will convince any CU supporter that maybe they are supporting an unjust cause, especially considering they want something for nothing.

Maybe that’s why a socialist candidate is surprising a lot of us. But I digress.

My main concern is the slander perpetuated by some extremists who obviously doesn’t give a flying freak what many good, upstanding and respected citizens feel about their methods, motivations and ultimately them. And basically that’s why I started this thread. And I’m not disappointed with the replies of the usual suspects this far.

I guess FBFA will try to shame the super majority of the Senate and Representatives in Tallahassee into changing their minds and allow the Walton BCC to have their way as they see fit....Constitution be damned (due process). Gosh I hope they see the charade for what it is...a brighter spotlight on those who greatly desire it.
Who knew fascist supporting Walton County was actually a hotbed of Socialism?
 
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter