Well, at least SoWal is not in the top 13
http://www.kiplinger.com/personalfinance/features/archives/2005/07/realestate.html
http://www.kiplinger.com/personalfinance/features/archives/2005/07/realestate.html
STL Don said:As much as I would love to believe the positive information, it sure seems that things have ground to a halt. Case in point, Dunes of Seagrove had 6 units for sale in March, 2006--now it has 15 and none of the inventory has been moving. Of course this has not stopped the addition of new units at very high prices.
Cavallino said:What is the average of 100 and 0?
The answer is 50 - which is really no closer to one than the other.
With that being said, I find "real estate market generalizations without focus and data" to be a waste of time. I would encourage those obsessively watching asking prices/inventory levels to focus on their specific neighborhood.
For example, here is what the data suggests in Watercolor - Phase 1.
- 35 properties for sale <detached single family and lots>
- 229 properties in this universe
- 15.28% of available properties are on the market
- a $3.6mm 4,000 sq ft home went pending this week
Why be so specific.....because condos & PRC units & lots in Phase 4 behind Publix are NOT comps for detached single family homes in Phase 1.
This closer focus shows that while inventory levels are higher than last year, they are nowhere near the levels of earlier posts for the section of the neighborhood that i watch.
The points being.....
- 50 is no closer to 0 than it is to 100
- market comps matter in real estate - not emotional generalizations
- look at closes....not listings
- enjoy the beach
My 2cents...now off my soapbox.
Doug :nono1:
Buckhead Rick said:Please excuse this question but some of the "locals" will have a better feel then I..Eagles Cove development off E. Hewett and the bay fell through for the time being because the zoning got "tighter". The rules of the past are not being allowed now. Does this signal newer projects will have a harder time coming on line?