• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.
New posts

2bohemians

Beach Fanatic
Jul 11, 2005
1,236
222
www.searchthe30a.com


U.S. Court Of Appeals Ruling Affirms Regional General Permit For 48,150 Acres Owned By The St. Joe Company (NYSE: Joe) In Walton And Bay Counties

U.S. Court of Appeals Rules Decisively Against Legal Challenge from Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) and Florida Sierra Club


Jacksonville, Florida - (December 10, 2007) - The St. Joe Company (NYSE: JOE) today announced that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit has affirmed a U.S. District Court ruling in favor of a Regional General Permit (RGP) issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) in 2004. The court in its ruling rejected an appeal by the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) and the Florida Sierra Club of an earlier U.S. District Court decision that had also validated the permit. JOE intervened in the case.
As a result of the court's ruling, 33,000 acres of environmentally-special lands in south Bay and Walton Counties will be permanently protected at no expense to the public.

The appeals court affirmed the lower court's decision that allows a watershed approach to USACE environmental permitting as an alternative to individual Section 404 "dredge and fill" permits which tend to promote piecemeal environmental protection with significantly less connectivity between protected parcels.



The permitting process upheld by the court allows JOE, as the landowner and permit applicant, to implement a large-scale environmental and development plan for 48,150 acres in Walton and Bay Counties contiguous to the West Bay Sector, the 75,000-acre master planned project in Bay County to be anchored by a new site for the Panama City - Bay County International Airport and the 41,000-acre West Bay Preservation Area. JOE, along with environmental groups and the community, also employed a watershed-level environmental planning process for the West Bay Sector.
"We are very pleased the appeals court upheld the district court's decision and reasoning," said Peter S. Rummell, chairman and CEO of JOE. "JOE joined with a coalition of local and national environmental groups, governmental agencies and environmental science experts in an effort to create a model for large-scale ecological protection across an entire region at the watershed level. It is unfortunate that the NRDC did not join in the cooperative process that put environmental planning ahead of development, and instead, chose confrontational litigation. We believe that when the parties involved have similar objectives, a collaborative approach, as this ruling affirms, can produce a far better environmental result."
"Protecting the best of Florida while at the same time planning for the future is going to require new and innovative approaches to land planning," said Rummell. "But most important, it's going to require cooperation and collaboration from companies and organizations that have been opponents in the past. With this ruling we have an opportunity to establish a new paradigm, one in which tens of thousands of environmentally special acres can be preserved for our children and grandchildren at no cost to the taxpayer."



More than 70 percent of the land covered by the RGP, approximately 33,000 acres that includes significant high-quality wetlands, will be permanently protected. Development is allowed on only 30 percent of the land, or approximately 15,000 acres. "Protection of water resources is critical to ensure the high-quality of the surface water for the residents of the region," said Rummell. "The plan implemented by this RGP also creates a wildlife corridor extending from Choctawhatchee Bay to St. Andrews Bay to protect and preserve forever the ecological integrity and biological diversity of one of Northwest Florida's most important watersheds."
"Environmental planning should extend beyond the lifespan of one landowner, one company or one group," said Rummell. "We believe the planning framework implemented with this permit, which goes well beyond customary regulatory requirements, provides permanent protection for some of the most environmentally sensitive areas in Northwest Florida, safeguards important water resources and protects the beauty and environmental integrity of the region for generations to come."
 

Smiling JOe

SoWal Expert
Nov 18, 2004
31,648
1,773
I hear that the buyers of the current airport site plopped down $56 million deposit into an escrow account today which will apply toward the purchase.
 

slandmarks

Beach Comber
Mar 23, 2007
36
0
www.southernlandmarks.com
http://www.wjhg.com/home/headlines/12341171.html

The Panama City Airport relocation project is facing more legal trouble. One of the groups opposing it has asked for an emergency motion to stay it's appeal of the F-A-A's decision to build the new airport in West Bay.
The hearing on the appeal was supposed to take place next week on December 18th. But, based on the motion to stay, filed by the group "Friends of P-F-N, the U-S Court of Appeals' Second Circuit in New York has tentatively set a January 8th hearing date.
Friends of P-F-N joined the Natural Resources Defense Council, and Defenders of Wildlife in appealing the F-A-A's decision to allow the airport relocation. They're challenging the West Bay site, saying, among many other reasons, the airport and the construction project itself will damage the wetlands and the environment.
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals approved a procedural pause 2-weeks ago, to allow all of the groups to present their arguments. Friends of P-F-N is the only one of the 3-groups asking for the stay. The group claims it must have the stay or it's case will be irreparably harmed.
But the F-A-A's attorneys, filed an emergency motion late Monday afternoon, saying that's not the case.
The attorneys say the Friends of P-F-N have not demonstrated any likelihood of winning the case, and therefore should not be granted the delay. The F-A-A is asking the court to schedule an emergency hearing on the motion for a stay.
The Panama City ? Bay County Airport Authority also filed an emergency motion late Monday afternoon, asking the court to vacate the stay, and schedule arguments as soon as possible. It's attorneys' claim the appeals court did not consider the airports arguments, and rubber-stamped the appeal.
To the average person, a 3-week delay might not seem like a long time. But the Airport Authority says timing is crucial right now. Board members have 90-days to ratify it's contract with Phoenix Construction for the first phase of the airport construction.
That 90-day window runs out on January 16th, about a week after the new proposed hearing date.
Also, the F-A--A is not allowing the local airport officials to draw on any of the 26-million dollars it allocated for the new airport. That money comes from the passenger facility charge tacked-onto all airline tickets.
Airport Authority board members say the delay could severely hurt the chances of getting a new airport.
There?s no word yet as to when the court will rule on ant of these motions.
Meanwhile, the Airport Authority did get some good news Monday.
The company buying the old airport property has plunked down it's deposit.
Community Airport Redevelopment deposited 56-and-a-half million dollars Monday in an escrow account. This deposit was part of the contract between "C-A-R" and the airport authority.
The developers, led by former actor Wayne Rogers, cannot take possession of the airport property until the relocation to West Bay is complete.
The overall deal is expected to bring the airport authority approximately 90-million dollars.
 

slandmarks

Beach Comber
Mar 23, 2007
36
0
www.southernlandmarks.com
and another article ...

http://newsherald.com/headlines/article.display.php?a=4798


Airport hearing rescheduled
December 11, 2007
By Tony Bridges

PANAMA CITY
A hearing scheduled for next week in the fight over the new Panama City-Bay County International Airport has been moved to Jan. 8.
The hearing was set late last month after a federal appeals court judge in New York issued a temporary stay suspending the Federal Aviation Administration?s approval of the project, which effectively stopped construction crews from beginning work.
Three organizations ? the Natural Resources Defense Council, the Defenders of Wildlife and a local pilot?s group, Friends of PFN ? sued the FAA last year, seeking to overturn its Record of Decision on the airport.
Judge Richard C. Wesley granted the plaintiff?s motion for a temporary stay, and all three members of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals were expected to hear arguments Dec. 18 before deciding whether to continue the stay.
Fred Warner, the head of PFN, confirmed late Monday that the hearing had been rescheduled after one of the judges recused himself. Warner said he did not know which judge recused himself or the reason why.​

 

Joe Complete

Beach Lover
Nov 15, 2004
173
17
Taxahassee FL/Watercolor
Today the court has partially reversed the stay and limited construction can now proceed.

Court Order Here

Petitioner Friends of PFN moves this Court for a stay
of the Federal Aviation Administration?s approval of airport
construction pending appeal. The intervenor has moved to
vacate an interim stay granted by this Court. Upon due
consideration, it is ORDERED that the interim stay be
modified to allow for the following work:

? Initial site surveying, including surveying along
existing logging roads, and setting points;
? Surveying and setting perimeter boundaries of the
jurisdictional wetlands, which will flag where the
jurisdictional wetlands are located;
? Silt fencing;
? Positioning of trailers and equipment (the Airport
Sponsor will not install any temporary utilities
until after the Hearing Date);
? Clearing, grubbing, and grading in non-
jurisdictional wetland areas, which includes
removing trees, stumps, and roots and stripping a
layer of topsoil; and
? Grading and stabilizing existing haul roads.​
 

NotDeadYet

Beach Fanatic
Jul 7, 2007
1,422
489
Wetlands get reprieve


[FONT=Verdana, Helvetica, Arial]
A permit that would allow 2,000 acres of wetlands to be destroyed is suspended.
[/FONT]​
[FONT=Verdana, Helvetica, Arial]
By CRAIG PITTMAN, Times Staff Writer
Published December 19, 2007



The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has taken the rare step of suspending a permit allowing destruction of 2,000 acres of wetlands in the Florida Panhandle to make way for a new Panama City airport.

The corps, which regulates the destruction of wetlands nationwide, suspended the permit this month after learning that a federal judge had issued a temporary injunction against building the $330-million project. The injunction was against the Federal Aviation Administration for approving the airport, the first to be built in the United States since Sept. 11.

"We're just trying to be cautious," David Hobbie, the head of the corps' regulatory division in Florida, said Tuesday.

A coalition of environmental groups have joined with fans of Panama City's current airport to sue the FAA. They say federal law on airport sites requires picking the least environmentally damaging alternative.

In this case, that would mean leaving the airport at its current site, said Linda Young of the Clean Water Network.

A federal judge granted their request for a temporary injunction, an indication that their case has at least some merit. The case is set to go to trial next month.

The new airport is supposed to be built on 4,000 acres of land about 20 miles north of Panama City, next door to Pine Log State Forest. The land was donated by the state's biggest private landowner, the St. Joe Co., which has plans for developing the 78,000 acres around the new airport.

Supporters say the new airport would help generate growth in a sparsely settled, economically challenged section of the Panhandle.

Opponents such as the Clean Water Network and the Natural Resources Defense Council dislike it for the same reason, contending it's a taxpayer-funded boondoggle that benefits no one but a big developer.

Airport authority vice chairman Bill Cramer complained that the court-ordered delay "is like grounding the space shuttle at T minus five seconds." St. Joe officials did not respond to a request for comment on the suspension of the wetlands permit Tuesday.

In 2002, St. Joe CEO Peter Rummell said the airport is key to the company's plans for the surrounding countryside: homes, stores, offices, hotels, bars, schools, even a barge port. With no airport, he said, those plans would not come to fruition. However, in recent interviews, St. Joe officials have insisted the airport is not a factor in their development plans.

Construction was just about to begin, said airport executive director Randy Curtis. He said work will continue in the non-wetland areas while awaiting the judge's decision.

The court cleared the airport to begin limited construction in those areas after the airport's attorneys argued that halting the project completely would cost the taxpayers more than $1-million a month and might jeopardize its future.

While the permit is suspended, the Army Corps will also investigate new information regarding plans to create about half of the 7-million cubic yards of fill needed for the airport site by pumping all the water out of the dirt. The corps had approved "de-watering" a minor amount of fill. Environmental groups contend using the process on such a large amount of fill could pollute nearby waterways.

The current Panama City airport has a picturesque setting on the city's waterfront convenient to local pilots. But city, county and state officials say the airport on St. Andrews Bay is vulnerable to hurricane storm surge and the runways are too short to handle big jetliners.

However, critics point out that in a county of 161,000 residents, the current airport is so quiet that the control tower shuts down every night at 10. It offers a dozen daily commercial flights - half the number it had five years ago - which they say make the need for a new airport questionable, especially one that at buildout would be bigger than Tampa International.

In a nonbinding referendum in 2004, Bay County voters rejected the airport relocation proposal 54 percent to 46 percent.

But in September, backers of the new airport got clearance from the FAA to use federal money for the new site, and then the corps issued a permit for destroying the wetlands. Officials broke ground on the project Nov. 1.

[/FONT]
 

Pirate

Beach Fanatic
Jan 2, 2006
331
29
I told ya JOE had a pile of swampland. It might be theor name on the title, but they can't do a thing with it.
 

slandmarks

Beach Comber
Mar 23, 2007
36
0
www.southernlandmarks.com
http://www.wmbb.com/gulfcoastwest/mbb/news.apx.-content-articles-MBB-2007-12-22-0004.html


Airport Construction

Saturday, Dec 22, 2007 - 07:40 PM

By Tuquyen Mach
E-mail | Biography
Panama City, FL -- Officials are giving the green light to re-start construction on the new Panama City airport.

The current airport off Highway 390 is set to be relocated to West Bay by 2010, but construction was temporarily halted thanks to a lawsuit.

Environmental groups filed the suit hoping to preserve the land the new airport will be built on.

Earlier this week, a federal court ruled that limited work could be done on the site as long as no wetlands were affected.

The Airport Authority announced it has issued a notice to Phoenix Construction for that work to proceed.

A hearing in the lawsuit is scheduled for January 23 in New York.
 

Buckhead Rick

Beach Lover
Feb 15, 2005
140
5
Isn't the whole state of Florida a wet land, what difference does this 2 thousand acres mean, other than there is always someone against everything?
 
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter