• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.
New posts

Mark Partington

Beach Lover
Dec 10, 2007
144
23
walton county
www.flickr.com
Signs,yea....ooops

John R, I understand this project is proposed on the property where they tried to build the asphalt plant, on the east side of Peach Creek and the IntraCoastal, and that the trucks would not be coming through residential areas, unless they happened to be pouring on a site in a neighborhood. Sounds like the owner of that property is subdividing the property and the proposed site will be on the newly split parcel, and not on the exact site where the asphalt plant was proposed.



Technically, they are required to mail notices to only the people owning within 300ft from the proposed plant, and the notice required is a sign posted by the County, on the property. As very few people ever drive down the road, the sign was never seen by the people who would be concerned. If this property is on the Intra-Coastal Waterway, as Comm. Commander states, everyone living on the water in that area and on Peach Creek, should be made aware.

I found a public notice sign last time,north of intercoasteal, on old ferry rd. You really couldnt drive by it ulnless you were in an ATV of some sort. I have pictures...my pictures of the situation arent suitable for publication.
m
 

SoWalSally

Beach Fanatic
Feb 19, 2005
649
49
BCC June 10 meeting agenda

9. SOUTHLAND CONCRETE PLANT – Project number 07-001-00093. This is a major development order application submitted by Buchanan and Harper Engineering, consisting of 3 buildings totaling 5,951 square feet on 4.17 acres with a future land use of industrial. The site is located at the end of Old Ferry Road in the Point Washington area. (parcel number 36-2S-19-24000-003-0000)
 

SoWalSally

Beach Fanatic
Feb 19, 2005
649
49
http://defuniakherald.com/?p=119

Concrete plant proposed for Point Washington area
May 21st, 2008 | 0
By DOTTY NIST

The Southland Concrete Plant proposal will be considered next month by the Walton County Board of County Commissioners (BCC), with the location of the proposed plant to be a four-acre site at the end of Old Ferry Road on the Intracoastal Waterway.
Following review by the Walton County Technical Review Committee, the plant proposal was heard by the Walton County Planning Commission in April 2008. The planning commission recommended for approval.
The property where the proposed plant would be located, approximately 50 acres in size, is already in use for industrial activities, including concrete manufacture. This property is subject to a 2001 federal court order directing Walton County to consider it as a heavy industrial land use area.
Despite heated community objection, in 2002 Walton County approved an asphalt plant proposal for this property. That plant was never built. More recently, another asphalt plant proposal was approved for a portion of the same property located on the north side of the Intracoastal. That plant was not constructed, either.
The Southland Concrete Plant was on the BCC agenda on May 13. Jason Bryan, county planner, commented that the developer had decided not to go forward with the asphalt plant that was previously approved on the north side of the Intracoastal.
The Southland Concrete Plant site is located on the south side of the waterway and is currently listed in the Walton County Property Appraiser’s records as under the ownership of Washington County Land and Development, L.L.C. The property was previously owned by S&S Materials.
District 4 Commissioner Sara Comander commented that she was surprised that the county had received no public comment on the concrete plant proposal.
“It’s been too quiet,” she said. Comander said she had concerns about the location of the plant right on the waterway.
Bryan said the developer had followed notification procedures as required by county code. He stated that, to his knowledge, the proposal meets all technical requirements of the county’s comprehensive plan and land development code.
However, Len Pullen, a Point Washington resident attending the BCC meeting, stated that he lives in the neighborhood where the concrete plant is being proposed, that he and others would oppose it, and that he had not received any notification of the project in his mail. He said he had not previously been aware of the proposal.
Concerned that others in the community had also been unaware, Comander moved to continue the item in order to allow for others to weigh in with their comments. Her motion was approved, and the item was scheduled for the June 10 BCC meeting, which is to begin at 4 p.m. and take place at the South Walton Courthouse Annex.
 

Smiling JOe

SoWal Expert
Nov 18, 2004
31,648
1,773
This proposed site is two lots north of residential property and directly across Peach Creek from residential homes. Not only is it on the IntraCoastal Waterway, it has much frontage on the delicate Peach Creek. Familiarize yourself with the location and voice your concerns today, if you have any. Meeting is next Tuesday, at 4pm, but don't let that stop you from sending emails to the County Commissioners, today, if you are concerned about a concrete plant being constructed so close to the residential properties in Historic Point Washington.
 

thanyille

Beach Crab
Jun 5, 2008
2
0
Not that different

There is a big difference between cement and concrete. Cement is much more problematic. Drive down Old Ferry Road just east of Peach Creek and you may be surprised to see 2 concrete plants and an asphalt plant. There has also been some activity on the north side of the intracoastal waterway. Might be something related to the airport.

Actually, there is not that much difference between cement and concrete. Cement is the adhesive material used in concrete. Concrete is the final product, when cement and agrigate are added together (agrigate being small rocks or shells). So really, the difference is just what stage of the process you are talking about. It begins as cement and ends as concrete. Also, pure cement is never used since its very expensive. Just a little FYI.
 

alareb88

Beach Crab
Jun 5, 2008
1
0
srb
The propose concrete plant is being continued until July bcc. It needs to be noted that the project is allowed per the federal court ruling. the bcc is limited in action. Please do not over react. They should meet environmental regulations but the federal court has ruled.
 

Smiling JOe

SoWal Expert
Nov 18, 2004
31,648
1,773
Over-react? Fortunately, I don't live directly across Peach Creek from the proposed site, or three lots to the south, unlike many other people. Lights, pollution, noise, etc -- just ain't right next to residential properties.
 
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter