I can understand that you would rather not have flouride in your water because of purported health concerns, but I would be more likely to be swayed by realistic numbers or scenarios.
A 22 lb kid drinking 12 liters of water (which at 26.4 lbs is more than THEY weigh) a day is not even close to realistic and makes me dismiss your statistics as hysteria.
Here are excerpts from a 1999 interview of Dr. Hardy Limeback, B.Sc., Ph.D., in Biochemistry, D.D.S., a "kook" and one time head of the Department of Preventive Dentistry for the University of Toronto, and president of the Canadian Association for Dental Research a staunch proponent of fluoridation until he too had a major change of opinion--
One of the most obvious living experiments today, Dr. Limeback believes, is a proof-positive comparison between any two Canadian cities. "Here in Toronto we've been fluoridating for 36 years.
Yet Vancouver - which has never fluoridated - has a cavity rate lower than Toronto's." And, he pointed out, cavity rates are low all across the industrialized world including Europe, which is 98% fluoride free. Low because of improved standards of living, less refined sugar, regular dental checkups, flossing and frequent brushing. Now less than 2 cavities per child Canada-wide, he said.
"I have absolutely no training in toxicity," he stated firmly. "Your well-intentioned dentist is simply following 50 years of misinformation from public health and the dental association. Me, too. Unfortunately, we were wrong."
"Speaking as the head of preventive dentistry, I told them that I had unintentionally mislead my colleagues and my students. For the past 15 years, I had refused to study the toxicology information that is readily available to anyone. Poisoning our children was the furthest thing from my mind."
Are lawsuits inevitable?" I asked the good doctor. "Remember tobacco," was his short, succinct reply.
These are not the words of some kook (such as me
) off the internet.
Again, I believe CHOICE is the key word here. By dumping fluoride into the municipal water supply, you take away the choice of folks that would rather not touch the stuff (unless they are wealthy enough to put in very expensive whole house water filters). By leaving it out of the water supply, people that want fluoride can buy fluoridated toothpaste, fluoride tablets, rinses, etc.
This argument is akin to the Dog Fly plane discussion. Are any of you that argued against the Dog Fly plane spraying now arguing for fluoridation???