This is all very interesting about the funding, how much is spent per child according to different types (exceptional, regular, etc.), but what I would like to know more about is how the WCSD has improved and will continue to improve their process for early identification of gifted and talented kids, and how they will improve the enrichment offered (or whatever the PC term is for providing appropriate/least restrictive education for every student).
When my sons were in WC schools, the powers-that-be would not even test for giftedness until 3rd grade. By that time, one of our boys was bored, making all A's with absolutely no effort at all, and was starting to get in trouble for cutting up; towards the end of 3rd grade he quit even caring about the busywork that was so not-challenging, and wouldn't be bothered to do a good job on stuff that was so far below the level where he needed to be. As for the behavior-he knew exactly how many checks he could get by his name in a given day without having any real consequences, and he maxed it out every day.
The other son was screechingly bored before the end of kindergarten, and was so miserable that we started homeschooling him before the end of his kindergarten year. This was a child who went into kindergarten absolutely thrilled about it, ready to read, so excited to go to school -- he had been to a good preschool for 2 years, had an enriched home environment, lots of books, reading, and also displayed early artistic talent creating complex sculptures and freehand drawings. So duh, coloring those worksheets and all that busy work drove him crazy.
I don't know where the root of the problem was, but I had tried working with principals, teachers, even superintendent, and could not get any results and did not have the heart to watch them destroy or discourage these fine bright spirits any longer. Homeschooling was the best option we could figure out at the time, and it worked out fantastic. Then Seaside Neighborhood School, and then out of state to boarding school.
A good number of families took their kids out of Butler after that school year, some of the most involved PTO folks and so on, because they were so disappointed with so very much about the school, and about the district's abject refusal to address parental concerns. I'm talking about involved, PTO parents, fundraisers, classroom volunteers -- they could not get anything but the stonewall treatment and "You're the first person/group who's ever brought this to our attention; we will look into the matter." Nothing was done except to circle the wagons more tightly. Two families we knew personally moved out of state in search of better schools, and several others stayed here and homeschooled.
That school is now under new leadership and I hear good things about it, so perhaps things are better now. Still, I would like to know specifically what the plan of action is around identifying and serving gifted and talented kids as early as possible; it seems an ongoing screening plan ought to be in place.