No, I do not have tenure. But, my livelihood is almost entirely dependent on me. And, I earn a lot more money that even the highest paid teacher in the system. For that much higher pay, I am willing to accept the risk of being "fired." But, should a teacher have that same risk, earning a much lower salary?
35K - 65K per year doesn't seem like a "low salary" to me.. 35K a year fresh out of college would have been nice when I graduated. I think the top end should be pushed up around 75K but generally I don't feel we underpay our teachers.
And by risk, I mean subject to the uncertainties of her students, the political nature of her job (principals are subject to political pressure just like superintendents), and a lack of support by parents.
Welcome to the real world! You just described my private sector job. I deal with office politics, underlings doing childish things, jerk bosses, new hires, etc.. I don't think teachers need to worry about getting fired if they are good at what they do. They have unions backing them up to boot.
And, can a teacher truly be academically free to teach the truth when the only contract she has is a one year contract? I really believe that this bill threatens academic freedom.
At the university level I understand the need for tenure, especially in areas of research. But grade school curriculum is carefully designed and regulated by parents, the school board, and state government. This bill actually strengthens that.
Again, I know that tenure sometimes protects a bad teacher.
IMHO, that's really pretty much all it does at the grade school level.
But, if a principal wants to get rid of tenured bad teacher they can, and that has happened in this system. Its hard to do and it should be hard to do. But, I believe that tenure more often protects good teachers from arbitrary firings that have nothing to do with teaching ability.
Where is this fear of good teachers getting fired coming from? Can you cite some examples? How often does it actually happen? What effect does it have on a teacher's career? IMO, teaching is a job, you have an employer, you do good work, you keep your job.
And again, this bill puts teachers on a one year contract and only half of their performance review is based on test scores. Thus, a good teacher, with good test score performance could be fired for trumped up reasons.
Not sure about this, according to this link -
The Details of Merit Pay for Teachers - Wakulla County news, information, politics, entertainment, schools and sports
The bill puts entry level teachers on 1 year contracts, and experienced teachers on four year contracts.
Lastly, I want to know how we are going to be able to keep the current salary schedule for teachers and at the same time reduce our budget 5% (that is returned to the State for "peformance pay")? This bill does not provide any "extra" money for teacher salaries...
I see this as an issue as well. Extra funding should be provided to make this work. We can easily handle that right here at the county level with a tax increase.
Last edited: