I think I can understand why someone would be a registered member of one party but choose to run without a party affiliation. A small percentage of the salary of the position a candidate is seeking is paid to the Party by the candidate as part of the loyalty oath:
The money should be used by the party Executive Committee to support the candidate and help with the election. The party executive committee should have a Campaign Committee composed of State Committeepersons and the Chair, as well as appointees responsible for devising an election strategy and budget to implement a countywide campaign. If a Party executive committee doesn't have offices or a standing campaign committee capable of aiding a candidate, it seems prudent that the candidate not use precious campaign funds to pay the assessment to the Party.
As far as being able to vote for the best candidate, I agree that people should be free to speak their minds about candidates. Unfortunately, there are other loyalty oaths that may make that difficult for some people --
http://election.dos.state.fl.us/forms/index.shtml#polcom
This is why Republican committeemen and women have to support Rick Scott and Marco Rubio, and it's been used against people in other ways.http://www.tampabay.com/news/politics/stateroundup/florida-gop-invokes-loyalty-oath-forbidding-support-of-independent-charlie/1089570
With all that said, I am supporting Sara Comander for one simple reason -- every time that I have gotten deeply involved in an issue that came before the BCC -- from the Big Blue Signs to Dawn Moliterno's midnight appointment to be ED of the TDC -- Sara Comander has been the voice of reason, the person that would hold up the stack of emails she'd received on a subject, and demand that people be allowed to voice their concerns on an issue and be heard. In short, she truly represents the people who elected her and in that she is alone on the BCC. I cannot imagine not rewarding that kind of service with another term, regardless of whether I agree with her on big national issues (that don't come before the BCC) or not.
I am a member of the _______________________________ Party; I am not a registered member of any other
political party; I have not been a candidate for nomination for any other political party for a period of 6 months
preceding the general election for which I seek to qualify; and I have paid the assessment levied against me, if any,
as a candidate for said office by the executive committee of the political party, of which I am a member.
The money should be used by the party Executive Committee to support the candidate and help with the election. The party executive committee should have a Campaign Committee composed of State Committeepersons and the Chair, as well as appointees responsible for devising an election strategy and budget to implement a countywide campaign. If a Party executive committee doesn't have offices or a standing campaign committee capable of aiding a candidate, it seems prudent that the candidate not use precious campaign funds to pay the assessment to the Party.
As far as being able to vote for the best candidate, I agree that people should be free to speak their minds about candidates. Unfortunately, there are other loyalty oaths that may make that difficult for some people --
I, ___________________________________, having been duly sworn,
say, that I am a member of the _________ Party; that I am a qualified
elector of Walton County, Florida; that
during my term of office, I will not support the election of the opponent
of any _____________ Party nominee, I will not oppose the election of any
Party nominee, nor will I support any non _________ against a
_____________ in any election other than in judicial races; that I am
qualified under the Constitution and Laws of the State of Florida and
the Charter and Bylaws of the _____________ Party to hold the
office I am seeking, or to which I have been elected; that I have not
violated any of the laws of the State of Florida relating to election of the
Charter and Bylaws of the _______________ Party.
http://election.dos.state.fl.us/forms/index.shtml#polcom
This is why Republican committeemen and women have to support Rick Scott and Marco Rubio, and it's been used against people in other ways.http://www.tampabay.com/news/politics/stateroundup/florida-gop-invokes-loyalty-oath-forbidding-support-of-independent-charlie/1089570
With all that said, I am supporting Sara Comander for one simple reason -- every time that I have gotten deeply involved in an issue that came before the BCC -- from the Big Blue Signs to Dawn Moliterno's midnight appointment to be ED of the TDC -- Sara Comander has been the voice of reason, the person that would hold up the stack of emails she'd received on a subject, and demand that people be allowed to voice their concerns on an issue and be heard. In short, she truly represents the people who elected her and in that she is alone on the BCC. I cannot imagine not rewarding that kind of service with another term, regardless of whether I agree with her on big national issues (that don't come before the BCC) or not.