I was wondering how y'all figured it was cheap without asking about the count or configurations. I do prefer a single door to a pair of french doors for longevity and furniture placement. I'd usually rather have an extra window than a static door. Sometimes I'd rather have a shutter for looks and drop down to a non-impact window that still meets design pressure with a shutter. Fixing several windows where operation is obsolete, redundant or inconvenient helps too. I never understand when I see a great big operable product high in a stairwell or dormer that can't be gotten to. Sometimes we see where an Architect calls a 2'6 6'0 in a kitchen and you just know the job budget would do better with a smaller product that won't terminate lower than the countertop or bunk bed or vanity or stairwell or,or,or.
I am thinking they figured it was cheap because it is significantly less than the typical door/win package for the type of homes we are discussing.
It's all about people's preferences:
- French doors can be much nicer for parties, moving in large furniture, open in nice weather etc.
- Depending on the design, a fixed door can be more pleasing to the eye than a window.
- A shutter only works when there is someone there to close it - not always the case in a vacation/2nd home market, and it can complicate dealings w/ the insurance company to have a combo of rated and non-rated products.
- You can save money by making windows fixed, but nothing is more annoying than a window you can't open when you want to - when painting, cleaning, have the AC off etc. There isn't a single operable window in my house that I haven't opened at one point.
- Obviously, a window that terminates below a counter etc. is a bad idea (the window w/ stairs going through it is a major pet peeve), but the contractor changing window sizes to help the "job budget" is a giant pain in the arse.