Couple of things after some thought...
Misty, you are correct. I should not be attacking the Jurors. They only acted on what they were presented. That seems to be the big issue, WHAT THEY WERE PRESENTED...
Sounds like they were presented with a conspiracy theory about Com. Meadows using influence to get someone allegedly unqualified, hired.
While, back in the world of reality, the employee is very qualified and people have spoken very highly of the employee. Did the Jurors get to see the employees personnel file and discuss it? Probably not, which again I say Shame On You State Attorney!!! You are a good user of slight of hand to distract from the real issue - Who Benefited from The Missing Money???
They were also most likely not presented with anything relating to Jason Catalano and his extreme Lack Of Experience, yet he was hired and quickly promoted within. He was paid a higher rate of pay as well. I guess its OK to favor him.
Seeing that Catalano was C. Jones' assistant, it would make sense that C. Jones' can use influence and no one else can...She can do no wrong. Its also very helpful that her hubby Jerry is pals with Bill Eddins.
I am glad to see that some people are picking up on the B.S. this whole thing was.
Hopefully someone can and will hold Adkinson, Eddins and Jones accountable for what appears to be some very serious issues that smack of criminality, favoritism, ethical issues and lies.