So, let's see....Okie Light should get a Mulligan because the women's BBall coaches were tragically killed? :roll: If thats the case, then Arkansas should get one also, because of the death of a player just before they played LSU. You can't use those excuses, life sucks, you lose great players to injuries, coaches die, parents die,etc.....you have to suck it up, strap the helmet on and play hard anyway. THAT is what champions do....Okie Light didn't.
They LOST to a 6-6 team. Period. Bama loss barely to the #1 team in the nation who has dominated every other team they've played this year.....
Bama deserves the rematch in the BCSNC...
Three weeks ago, OK was a completely different team. They have since lost their major offensive playmakers and are very weak offensively. Okie Light played a great defensive game, but I can't say it was against an offensive powerhouse.
No offense (pardon the pun) Skunky, but if I remember correctly, Bama outplayed LSU even though they lost. If they would have hit their FG's they would have won the game. Bama may not have a "signature" win, but I also think that the Big 12-1+2-1 isn't as strong as the computers show. You forget that Bama beat Arkansas handily and they will be in the BCS top 6 tonight more than likely. Guess a signature win against the hogs doesn't count...:roll:
Bottom line IMO. The BCSNC game should be LSU/Bama. Reason is very simple. OKie Light was dominated at ISU (even though the score shows an OT win) by a .500 (6-6) team. No one deserves to be in the championship game when they lose to a .500 team.