No....just a sticky caps key.:roll: But since you asked, Redfish perceives value from a PRIVATE beach access for their development. "So?", you ask. The owners of the adjacent PRIVATE homes derive value from their location and the right to quiet enjoyment of PRIVATE property. Damn caps are stickin' again.You have a lot of "private" in CAPS Vagrant. Is your issue really diminution of residential values or distaste for private access?
Great visual...thanks. So I guess you're also implying that the public restrooms that will be built at the public access (per Brad Pickel) is not good enough for those at Redfish Village? I know that's not true.Frankly, I'm glad VOR developers decided private bathrooms would be far better than having kids crap in the dunes (although I don't discount the value of this for dune restoration purposes).
So, if you're "likable", you can have your way with the county and citizens of Walton County?I have no idea whether the developers did anything wrong in obtaining approval, but the general consensus seems to be that these are likable guys.
I'm no history buff, but didn't the Roman Empire fall because there were no more lands to "rape and pillage"?Hell, Roman Emperors use to build lavish bath houses as lasting testaments to their power and glory which archaeologist spent countless time and resources trying to uncover.
You have missed the entire point(s). The bathrooms, themselves, are not the issue.Can't a bathroom be constructed in a manner that is non-offensive and aesthetically pleasing to neighboring landowners?
This is a serious issue for all parties involved.