Here to keep deputies from making a sound decision? I'm here so both sides of the story can be heard, and not just YOU with your pro union hand out wanting their money screaming for them to "VOTE PBA"..
And the reason everyone is on here under the cloke of a fiticious names (as you put it) is to keep from being ridiculed and called names by upper brass at the sheriff's office that are pushing for this union. Even you yourself hid under that same cloke to begin with, so how are we to know you are who you say you are now?
And as far as the candidates working under the PBA or why they took jobs at an agency covered by the PBA, who knows. Even more who cares, I am quite sure it had nothing to do with the PBA being there. And I am not even sure the PBA were involved in either of those two agency's at the time they started their career at those prospective departments.
As many have said before, this whole PBA thing stinks with Ralph's stamp of approval all over it. Why not wait and give the new man a chance.[/quote/]
Leo101, If I were wanting to hide my identity, I would not have made my screen name PBA Rep.
Still, if unionization is so bad, why did both candidates go to work where they had a solid PBA collective bargaining contracts, the contract at each of their agencies wasn't started because they did not trust their administrations, it was started to secure their rights and benefits. Without a contract you are at the mercy of whoever the Sheriff is.... without everyone being treated equally.
So your side of the issue is to leave your fate in the hands of whoever and hope for the best? Is this what I'm getting from your response?
Remember Vote PBA