by Robin M.
August 29, 2011
Somehow, despite being uncovered as a paid shill who in the past has been hired by groups to push their propaganda under the guise of writing columns, conservative writer Armstrong Williams is still being given column space to pontificate about the state of the U.S. government.
His latest lament? How difficult the rich in this country have it. After all, they have been given the daunting responsibility for caring for a large portion of the country’s wealth, a challenging task indeed.
Armstrong writes: “The wealthy are a true minority in the world and are often criticized and ridiculed for their success in spite of the fact that everyone, given the choice, would rather try it rich than continue being poor.” But before you think he is really referring to those hard working, nose to the grindstone rich, he closes his piece by discussing inherited wealth — something that takes no more effort than the fortune to be born into the right family. “I don’t know where it originated, but the cliché ‘the poor get poorer and the rich get richer’ has been in use for some time, implying that the poor will never rise out of poverty. Is this true? Why do people stay mired in poverty while others can pass on generational wealth?”
Is it really the result of hard work not to squander away a fortune, when provided with million dollar annual bonuses or multimillion dollar inheritances? And is it harder work than working two or more jobs in an attempt to bring yourself out of poverty? Plus, doesn’t calling the rich the “true minority” both belittle the struggles of real minorities and place a group of people who are in many ways the most privileged in the world in a status of somehow being victimized?
Read more: http://www.care2.com/causes/armstrong-williams-wealthy-are-a-true-minority.html#ixzz1WYwj4KSj
Conservative Columnist: Social Problems Are Caused By “Depravity Of The Poor”
· by Robin M.
· August 25, 2011
One of the underlying threads of conservative thought is that the rich are inherently hard working and “earn” their good fortune, and the poor almost always are poor due to some sort of moral lacking. It’s the Horatio Alger, “pull yourself up by your bootstraps” mentality run a muck — the idea that with enough effort and a pure heart, every person will eventually be successful, and if you are not, it must be a sign of weakness of character.
This is the assumption that makes the right believe that most people on welfare, on unemployment, using food stamps or other government aid must be lazy, or lacking in courage, determination or pride. No one “needs” government assistance because they should be able to care for themselves, and a “handout” just makes them try even less.
It’s usually not discussed publicly in so many words, even though that’s what many believe. But David French of the National Review Online doesn’t have any qualms about coming right out and voicing it himself.
It is simply a fact that our social problems are increasingly connected to the depravity of the poor. If an American works hard, completes their education, gets married, and stays married, then they will rarely — very rarely — be poor. At the same time, poverty is the handmaiden of illegitimacy, divorce, ignorance, and addiction. As we have poured money into welfare, we’ve done nothing to address the behaviors that lead to poverty while doing all we can to make that poverty more comfortable and sustainable.
So there are almost no “educated poor”? Rarely any “married poor”? And if the poor always fall into one of these categories of “depravity” that need to be addressed, why are conservatives so anxious to cut the means of addressing them, such as public education, access to affordable colleges, an ability to obtain birth control so that marriage can be saved for those who really are committed to being lifelong partners and not just people who happened to accidentally get pregnant?
Does “depravity” lead to poverty, or is it more often lack of livable wage jobs? Instead of fighting to cut off the programs that allegedly sustain poverty and make it comfortable, how about focusing on increasing minimum wage and employee rights in the workplace?
The only depravity I’ve been seeing lately hasn’t been coming from the poor. It’s the callousness of man to his fellow man.
Read more: http://www.care2.com/causes/conserv...d-by-depravity-of-the-poor.html#ixzz1WZF9F94e
Gwen Break
Gwen BreakBeach FanaticSouth Walton, near the bay479 postsJoined View profileMessageBeach Fanatic
506 views
Edited
Replies
1mputnalmputnalBeach Fanatic2,396 postsJoined View profileMessageBeach Fanatic
There will always be poor people and there will always be rich people. In our society both are minorities but it seems that the rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer. We need to figure out what is causing this destructive phenomenon. Is it because of poor choices and inherited wealth or is because of the power of wealth creating trickle down depravities.
The hope is that we have "opportunity" to make good choices to work hard, educate ourselves and provide for a family. If we do not take advantage of those opportunities then there will be negative consequences. On the other hand we have too much power in wealth because of the rise of big business. Large Corporations have no conscience other than profits, stocks and dividends. We have allowed big business to manipulate laws, pay less tax percentages, avoid regulation, avoid attention to safety and environment and finally merging to the point of controlling the market place. There are fewer jobs because of the growth in mega corporations. They are able to suppress our creative nature in alternative energy, technology and healthcare. If a new invention is discovered guess who purchases the rights to the patent? If a small business finds a niche to compete in the market place guess who purchases that business?
All of us need to vote for politicians who have a "record" supporting small business and not just empty rhetoric. Consumerism needs to shift away from big business even if it means paying a little more or driving a little further or shrinking the stock market. IMO if we do not move in this direction we will risk our free market society.
The hope is that we have "opportunity" to make good choices to work hard, educate ourselves and provide for a family. If we do not take advantage of those opportunities then there will be negative consequences. On the other hand we have too much power in wealth because of the rise of big business. Large Corporations have no conscience other than profits, stocks and dividends. We have allowed big business to manipulate laws, pay less tax percentages, avoid regulation, avoid attention to safety and environment and finally merging to the point of controlling the market place. There are fewer jobs because of the growth in mega corporations. They are able to suppress our creative nature in alternative energy, technology and healthcare. If a new invention is discovered guess who purchases the rights to the patent? If a small business finds a niche to compete in the market place guess who purchases that business?
All of us need to vote for politicians who have a "record" supporting small business and not just empty rhetoric. Consumerism needs to shift away from big business even if it means paying a little more or driving a little further or shrinking the stock market. IMO if we do not move in this direction we will risk our free market society.
Checking your forum account
Please wait while we verify your forum account.