BCC buys parcel in Miramar

Thanks for the tip.

Thanks for the tip.

I can usually follow along on these things, but this deed is for a piece of property in a whole different area of the county than the the Miraramar piece.


In the executive session it was clearly stated on more than one occasion that the insurance company would not be participating in this Bert Harriss claim. It is all on the county. They are hoping to sell the land to FDOT for a retention pond. I am hearing talk of a section 8 housing project on it though.

I can usually follow along on these things, but this deed is for a piece of property in a whole different area of the county than the the Miraramar piece.


In the executive session it was clearly stated on more than one occasion that the insurance company would not be participating in this Bert Harriss claim. It is all on the county. They are hoping to sell the land to FDOT for a retention pond. I am hearing talk of a section 8 housing project on it though.

Maybe I don't have enough experience in the FDOT retention area's. It doesn't look like a qualified property to me from an engineering point of view. I'd be interested to see who brought that idea up as a potential use. It may have been a deflection or red herring.

Thanks

Maybe I don't have enough experience in the FDOT retention area's. It doesn't look like a qualified property to me from an engineering point of view. I'd be interested to see who brought that idea up as a potential use. It may have been a deflection or red herring.

Thanks

When I get back to one of my computers I will post the minutes from the sessions, I believe the idea was mentioned by the county attorney, Burke.

I love this new Microsoft Mesh system. Here is the last one.

One of my favorite quotes of all time:

Bert Harris claims are excluded by the insurance carrier.

$550,000 straight out of the "Land Account" (per Pennington with the Clerk's Office) of the BCC. In other words straight out of the taxpayers pocket.

We have several cases either under litigation or in the process of being filed that are very similar in nature (Bert Harris claims).

Time will tell but from what I have seen, all of them have good chances of getting a favorable jury verdict, if the county doesn't settle before hand.

Bert Harris claims are excluded by the insurance carrier.

$550,000 straight out of the "Land Account" (per Pennington with the Clerk's Office) of the BCC. In other words straight out of the taxpayers pocket.

We have several cases either under litigation or in the process of being filed that are very similar in nature (Bert Harris claims).

Time will tell but from what I have seen, all of them have good chances of getting a favorable jury verdict, if the county doesn't settle before hand.

So in other words a broke county is about to go bankrupt?

So in other words a broke county is about to go bankrupt?

Starting to look that way.

Bert Harris claims are excluded by the insurance carrier.

$550,000 straight out of the "Land Account" (per Pennington with the Clerk's Office) of the BCC. In other words straight out of the taxpayers pocket.

We have several cases either under litigation or in the process of being filed that are very similar in nature (Bert Harris claims).

Time will tell but from what I have seen, all of them have good chances of getting a favorable jury verdict, if the county doesn't settle before hand.

So they lied in the meeting where it said if they settle then the insurance would cover some of the bill. The Min. said 1/3 of the bill. Is this not True??????

So they lied in the meeting where it said if they settle then the insurance would cover some of the bill. The Min. said 1/3 of the bill. Is this not True??????

I read this twice again. It is astounding to me that while the BCC was negotiating what they might do to who and talking about baiting, etc. that none of them cleared up the issue of whether they had insurance coverage for the settlement.

Someone smarter than me said:

Where the liability of a person for their debts is eroded, it brings the relationship to borrowed money even closer to the relationship that can be observed between elected officials in government--who have little or no accountability attached to the money they have charge over--and tax revenues.

So they lied in the meeting where it said if they settle then the insurance would cover some of the bill. The Min. said 1/3 of the bill. Is this not True??????

As of 12/18 the insurance company has not made any payment to the county that I am aware of.

As of 12/18 the insurance company has not made any payment to the county that I am aware of.

How'd you do that on a weekend???

How'd you do that on a weekend???

I have people.