Sounds like another power grab by the Feds.
EDITORIAL: Wave goodbye to Internet freedom - Washington Times
idlewindidlewindBeach FanaticWalton/Okaloosa County and a little south alabama 2,687 postsJoined View profileMessageBeach Fanatic
435 views
Replies
4beachmouse
beachmouseBeach FanaticBluewater Bay, FL3,499 postsJoined View profileMessageBeach Fanatic
There's a whole lot more to the heavily biased article involving net neutrality, and why it's a very good idea, especially since there is no or limited high speed broadband competition still in so many sections of the country.
Do y'all really want Mediacom to have the right to block or throttle traffic from any web site it has a whim to target?
Do y'all really want Mediacom to have the right to block or throttle traffic from any web site it has a whim to target?
Matt J
Matt JSWGB24,862 postsJoined View profileMessageSWGB
Do y'all really want Mediacom to have the right to block or throttle traffic from any web site it has a whim to target?
They can barely provide internet service much less start blocking things.
futurebeachbum
futurebeachbumBeach FanaticSnellsburg, GA1,100 postsJoined View profileMessageBeach Fanatic
rules he says will "preserve the freedom and openness of the Internet."
What a crock!
The last thing we need is more government control of what we're able to do on the Internet.
Douglas the Intrepid
Douglas the IntrepidBeach FanaticOn the shores of paradise, Seagrove Beach1,329 postsJoined View profileMessageBeach Fanatic
I think rules on IP's that they are not allowed to place their own limitations on internet traffic to the end user is beneficial to internet freedom in general. I think there are those who are so narrow minded, just the word government in general puts them into a tizzy without regard to the facts or implications.
Checking your forum account
Please wait while we verify your forum account.