General discussion & info about South Walton, Florida.

All About SoWal

Advertise or find a business, discuss business.

Business & Services

Jobs

Festivals, classes, gatherings, activities.

Events & Music

Food & Dining

Marketplace

property, realtors, builders, development, infrastructure ...

Real Estate

Long Term Rentals

Vacation Rentals

SoWal Lounge

BlueMtnBeachVagrant

Beach Fanatic

I really thought that after all this time, someone would comment on Matt's post.  I guess this sadly confirms that most of the old "stand your sand" folks have departed SoWal and hang out in Facebook land where I first caught wind of all this.

I have to admit that this and other articles regarding the Pinelles Customary Use ruling point to a real and obvious problem:
 
Something is really screwed up regarding the notion of CU when Pinelles County is compared with Walton County.  Some of you might have been right when you said Walton County caved in too early.  I wondered the same thing but I didn't lose too much sleep since this expensive litigation was brought to an end in favor of private property rights. More importantly, at least Walton County was shown that they just can't take private rights away without [B]due process[/B] regardless of the outcome (as opposed to simply passing a customary use ordinance without any due process). 

If anything, from the perspective of CU advocates, one has to question why the county gave in before the trial when they were going down the seemingly exact same path that Pinnelles County did (and in a similar time frame). 

The obvious issue now is that the settlement CANNOT BE REVERSED.  As known, the Walton County commissioners settled the customary use lawsuit [B]"with prejudice"[/B] which means the case cannot be appealed.

NONE of the commissioners were "[I]smart enough[/I]" to come to the conclusion on their own to stop the customary use litigation and throw in the towel.  Yet, somehow, the acting county attorney apparently convinced them to do so.  After seeing the outcome at Pinelles County, I and others have to wonder why. 

On the flip side, I'm not sure that CU in Pinnelles is a done deal.  Is the U.S. Supreme Court still an option for the beach front owners?

Any factual opinions would be appreciated.

I really thought that after all this time, someone would comment on Matt&#039;s post.  I guess this sadly confirms that most of the old &quot;stand your sand&quot; folks have departed SoWal and hang out in Facebook land where I first caught wind of all this.<br />
<br />
I have to admit that this and other articles regarding the Pinelles Customary Use ruling point to a real and obvious problem:<br />
 <br />
Something is really screwed up regarding the notion of CU when Pinelles County is compared with Walton County.  Some of you might have been right when you said Walton County caved in too early.  I wondered the same thing but I didn&#039;t lose too much sleep since this expensive litigation was brought to an end in favor of private property rights. More importantly, at least Walton County was shown that they just can&#039;t take private rights away without <b>due process</b> regardless of the outcome (as opposed to simply passing a customary use ordinance without any due process). <br />
<br />
If anything, from the perspective of CU advocates, one has to question why the county gave in before the trial when they were going down the seemingly exact same path that Pinnelles County did (and in a similar time frame). <br />
<br />
The obvious issue now is that the settlement CANNOT BE REVERSED.  As known, the Walton County commissioners settled the customary use lawsuit <b>&quot;with prejudice&quot;</b> which means the case cannot be appealed.<br />
<br />
NONE of the commissioners were &quot;<i>smart enough</i>&quot; to come to the conclusion on their own to stop the customary use litigation and throw in the towel.  Yet, somehow, the acting county attorney apparently convinced them to do so.  After seeing the outcome at Pinelles County, I and others have to wonder why. <br />
<br />
On the flip side, I&#039;m not sure that CU in Pinnelles is a done deal.  Is the U.S. Supreme Court still an option for the beach front owners?<br />
<br />
Any factual opinions would be appreciated.

Dawn

bob1

[QUOTE="BlueMtnBeachVagrant, post: 967637, member: 684"]
I really thought that after all this time, someone would comment on Matt's post.  I guess this sadly confirms that most of the old "stand your sand" folks have departed SoWal and hang out in Facebook land where I first caught wind of all this.

I have to admit that this and other articles regarding the Pinelles Customary Use ruling point to a real and obvious problem:
 
Something is really screwed up regarding the notion of CU when Pinelles County is compared with Walton County.  Some of you might have been right when you said Walton County caved in too early.  I wondered the same thing but I didn't lose too much sleep since this expensive litigation was brought to an end in favor of private property rights. More importantly, at least Walton County was shown that they just can't take private rights away without [B]due process[/B] regardless of the outcome (as opposed to simply passing a customary use ordinance without any due process).

If anything, from the perspective of CU advocates, one has to question why the county gave in before the trial when they were going down the seemingly exact same path that Pinnelles County did (and in a similar time frame).

The obvious issue now is that the settlement CANNOT BE REVERSED.  As known, the Walton County commissioners settled the customary use lawsuit [B]"with prejudice"[/B] which means the case cannot be appealed.

NONE of the commissioners were "[I]smart enough[/I]" to come to the conclusion on their own to stop the customary use litigation and throw in the towel.  Yet, somehow, the acting county attorney apparently convinced them to do so.  After seeing the outcome at Pinelles County, I and others have to wonder why.

On the flip side, I'm not sure that CU in Pinnelles is a done deal.  Is the U.S. Supreme Court still an option for the beach front owners?

Any factual opinions would be appreciated.
[/QUOTE]
Are you one of the Aholes who were posting screenshots of this forum on Facebook and smearing good community members out of context?

<blockquote class="xfBb-quote" data-name="BlueMtnBeachVagrant">I really thought that after all this time, someone would comment on Matt&#039;s post.  I guess this sadly confirms that most of the old &quot;stand your sand&quot; folks have departed SoWal and hang out in Facebook land where I first caught wind of all this.<br />
<br />
I have to admit that this and other articles regarding the Pinelles Customary Use ruling point to a real and obvious problem:<br />
 <br />
Something is really screwed up regarding the notion of CU when Pinelles County is compared with Walton County.  Some of you might have been right when you said Walton County caved in too early.  I wondered the same thing but I didn&#039;t lose too much sleep since this expensive litigation was brought to an end in favor of private property rights. More importantly, at least Walton County was shown that they just can&#039;t take private rights away without <b>due process</b> regardless of the outcome (as opposed to simply passing a customary use ordinance without any due process).<br />
<br />
If anything, from the perspective of CU advocates, one has to question why the county gave in before the trial when they were going down the seemingly exact same path that Pinnelles County did (and in a similar time frame).<br />
<br />
The obvious issue now is that the settlement CANNOT BE REVERSED.  As known, the Walton County commissioners settled the customary use lawsuit <b>&quot;with prejudice&quot;</b> which means the case cannot be appealed.<br />
<br />
NONE of the commissioners were &quot;<i>smart enough</i>&quot; to come to the conclusion on their own to stop the customary use litigation and throw in the towel.  Yet, somehow, the acting county attorney apparently convinced them to do so.  After seeing the outcome at Pinelles County, I and others have to wonder why.<br />
<br />
On the flip side, I&#039;m not sure that CU in Pinnelles is a done deal.  Is the U.S. Supreme Court still an option for the beach front owners?<br />
<br />
Any factual opinions would be appreciated.</blockquote>Are you one of the Aholes who were posting screenshots of this forum on Facebook and smearing good community members out of context?

[QUOTE="bob1, post: 967639, member: 16511"]
Are you one of the Aholes who were posting screenshots of this forum on Facebook and smearing good community members out of context?
[/QUOTE]
I guess I am an Ahole - only because I personally spent many thousands of dollars fighting customary use.  But I have absolutely no idea what you're talkin about regarding "[I]posting screenshots of this forum on Facebook and smearing good community members out of context[/I]."

Sheesh, I fought customary use like the plague for many reasons.  Nothing to hide there as anyone can search on this forum through the many years.  In my post above, I simply point out the parallels between Pinellis County and Walton County.  But instead of questioning why the county threw in the towel before trial (as opposed to Pinellis County), you attack me because I'm the only thing you can see for now.  You appear to be so blinded by "hate" that you can't see that I'm throwing you CU folks a bone.  Why would I smear anybody at the same time?

It seems to me that you and your brethren should really be questioning why the BCC and the acting county attorney settled the case [B]with prejudice[/B] before going to trial, [B]especially in light of the Pinellis County CU outcome [/B](a little hindsight, of course)[B].  [/B]I just assumed the acting county attorney knew something we did didn't.  But whatever it was, with the information presented in the news article, it really does make one wonder why the acting county attorney and Walton County BCC caved in.

BTW, can you or others share the "smears" you mention here? Which Facebook page did they take place in?  Inquiring minds want to know.

<blockquote class="xfBb-quote" data-name="bob1">Are you one of the Aholes who were posting screenshots of this forum on Facebook and smearing good community members out of context?</blockquote>I guess I am an Ahole - only because I personally spent many thousands of dollars fighting customary use.  But I have absolutely no idea what you&#039;re talkin about regarding &quot;<i>posting screenshots of this forum on Facebook and smearing good community members out of context</i>.&quot;<br />
<br />
Sheesh, I fought customary use like the plague for many reasons.  Nothing to hide there as anyone can search on this forum through the many years.  In my post above, I simply point out the parallels between Pinellis County and Walton County.  But instead of questioning why the county threw in the towel before trial (as opposed to Pinellis County), you attack me because I&#039;m the only thing you can see for now.  You appear to be so blinded by &quot;hate&quot; that you can&#039;t see that I&#039;m throwing you CU folks a bone.  Why would I smear anybody at the same time?<br />
<br />
It seems to me that you and your brethren should really be questioning why the BCC and the acting county attorney settled the case <b>with prejudice</b> before going to trial, <b>especially in light of the Pinellis County CU outcome </b>(a little hindsight, of course)<b>.  </b>I just assumed the acting county attorney knew something we did didn&#039;t.  But whatever it was, with the information presented in the news article, it really does make one wonder why the acting county attorney and Walton County BCC caved in.<br />
<br />
BTW, can you or others share the &quot;smears&quot; you mention here? Which Facebook page did they take place in?  Inquiring minds want to know.

[QUOTE="BlueMtnBeachVagrant, post: 967657, member: 684"]
I guess I am an Ahole - only because I personally spent many thousands of dollars fighting customary use.  But I have absolutely no idea what you're talkin about regarding "[I]posting screenshots of this forum on Facebook and smearing good community members out of context[/I]."

Sheesh, I fought customary use like the plague for many reasons.  Nothing to hide there as anyone can search on this forum through the many years.  In my post above, I simply point out the parallels between Pinellis County and Walton County.  But instead of questioning why the county threw in the towel before trial (as opposed to Pinellis County), you attack me because I'm the only thing you can see for now.  You appear to be so blinded by "hate" that you can't see that I'm throwing you CU folks a bone.  Why would I smear anybody at the same time?

It seems to me that you and your brethren should really be questioning why the BCC and the acting county attorney settled the case [B]with prejudice[/B] before going to trial, [B]especially in light of the Pinellis County CU outcome [/B](a little hindsight, of course)[B].  [/B]I just assumed the acting county attorney knew something we did didn't.  But whatever it was, with the information presented in the news article, it really does make one wonder why the acting county attorney and Walton County BCC caved in.

BTW, can you or others share the "smears" you mention here? Which Facebook page did they take place in?  Inquiring minds want to know.
[/QUOTE]
Thanks for the bone. You're an awesome neighbor.

<blockquote class="xfBb-quote" data-name="BlueMtnBeachVagrant">I guess I am an Ahole - only because I personally spent many thousands of dollars fighting customary use.  But I have absolutely no idea what you&#039;re talkin about regarding &quot;<i>posting screenshots of this forum on Facebook and smearing good community members out of context</i>.&quot;<br />
<br />
Sheesh, I fought customary use like the plague for many reasons.  Nothing to hide there as anyone can search on this forum through the many years.  In my post above, I simply point out the parallels between Pinellis County and Walton County.  But instead of questioning why the county threw in the towel before trial (as opposed to Pinellis County), you attack me because I&#039;m the only thing you can see for now.  You appear to be so blinded by &quot;hate&quot; that you can&#039;t see that I&#039;m throwing you CU folks a bone.  Why would I smear anybody at the same time?<br />
<br />
It seems to me that you and your brethren should really be questioning why the BCC and the acting county attorney settled the case <b>with prejudice</b> before going to trial, <b>especially in light of the Pinellis County CU outcome </b>(a little hindsight, of course)<b>.  </b>I just assumed the acting county attorney knew something we did didn&#039;t.  But whatever it was, with the information presented in the news article, it really does make one wonder why the acting county attorney and Walton County BCC caved in.<br />
<br />
BTW, can you or others share the &quot;smears&quot; you mention here? Which Facebook page did they take place in?  Inquiring minds want to know.</blockquote>Thanks for the bone. You&#039;re an awesome neighbor.

[QUOTE="bob1, post: 967658, member: 16511"]
Thanks for the bone. You're an awesome neighbor.
[/QUOTE]
You're too kind.

<blockquote class="xfBb-quote" data-name="bob1">Thanks for the bone. You&#039;re an awesome neighbor.</blockquote>You&#039;re too kind.

UpNorth

Beach Lover

This seems petty. If I purchased a property and randomly had strangers walking around in my backyard I’d have an issue with that; totally understandable.

The rebuttal of course is entitlement and something around “you don’t own the beach/water”. To which the response is fairly straightforward. Well, thats debatable, but YOU certainly don’t! Next.

This seems petty. If I purchased a property and randomly had strangers walking around in my backyard I’d have an issue with that; totally understandable.<br />
<br />
The rebuttal of course is entitlement and something around “you don’t own the beach/water”. To which the response is fairly straightforward. Well, thats debatable, but YOU certainly don’t! Next.

Jane

[QUOTE="UpNorth, post: 967662, member: 44589"]
If I purchased a property and randomly had strangers walking around in my backyard I’d have an issue with that; totally understandable.
[/QUOTE]
This comparison has been made many times totally ridiculous.

<blockquote class="xfBb-quote" data-name="UpNorth">If I purchased a property and randomly had strangers walking around in my backyard I’d have an issue with that; totally understandable.</blockquote>This comparison has been made many times totally ridiculous.

[QUOTE="UpNorth, post: 967662, member: 44589"]
This seems petty. If I purchased a property and randomly had strangers walking around in my backyard I’d have an issue with that; totally understandable.

The rebuttal of course is entitlement and something around “you don’t own the beach/water”. To which the response is fairly straightforward. Well, thats debatable, but YOU certainly don’t! Next.
[/QUOTE]
Tell me you've never been anywhere else in Florida without telling me you've never been anywhere else in Florida.

<blockquote class="xfBb-quote" data-name="UpNorth">This seems petty. If I purchased a property and randomly had strangers walking around in my backyard I’d have an issue with that; totally understandable.<br />
<br />
The rebuttal of course is entitlement and something around “you don’t own the beach/water”. To which the response is fairly straightforward. Well, thats debatable, but YOU certainly don’t! Next.</blockquote>Tell me you&#039;ve never been anywhere else in Florida without telling me you&#039;ve never been anywhere else in Florida.

Nice funny joke. Some real substance.

Just saying, the argument of “they can’t take something that’s not theirs” being made by people who want to take something that’s not theirs….little hollow, if not ironic. At least one side has the evidence of a deed. But joke and snide away.

Nice funny joke. Some real substance.<br />
<br />
Just saying, the argument of “they can’t take something that’s not theirs” being made by people who want to take something that’s not theirs….little hollow, if not ironic. At least one side has the evidence of a deed. But joke and snide away.

Lake View Too

SoWal Insider

[QUOTE="UpNorth, post: 967666, member: 44589"]
Nice funny joke. Some real substance.

Just saying, the argument of “they can’t take something that’s not theirs” being made by people who want to take something that’s not theirs….little hollow, if not ironic. At least one side has the evidence of a deed. But joke and snide away.
[/QUOTE]
Are you saying that the concept of customary use is not recognized by law anywhere in the United States, anywhere in Florida, or anywhere in Walton County? I just need some clarification. Since it was upheld by the Florida Supreme Court for Florida in 1975, and is upheld in various states, it seems like it has never been upheld in Walton County because it was never allowed to be adjudicated in a court of law. It was apparently prevented from being a judicated by an "acting county attorney" in a settlement deal that was surrounded in secrecy. It seems like it has never been proven or disproven in a court of law.

<blockquote class="xfBb-quote" data-name="UpNorth">Nice funny joke. Some real substance.<br />
<br />
Just saying, the argument of “they can’t take something that’s not theirs” being made by people who want to take something that’s not theirs….little hollow, if not ironic. At least one side has the evidence of a deed. But joke and snide away.</blockquote>Are you saying that the concept of customary use is not recognized by law anywhere in the United States, anywhere in Florida, or anywhere in Walton County? I just need some clarification. Since it was upheld by the Florida Supreme Court for Florida in 1975, and is upheld in various states, it seems like it has never been upheld in Walton County because it was never allowed to be adjudicated in a court of law. It was apparently prevented from being a judicated by an &quot;acting county attorney&quot; in a settlement deal that was surrounded in secrecy. It seems like it has never been proven or disproven in a court of law.

[QUOTE="Lake View Too, post: 967670, member: 9756"]
Are you saying that the concept of customary use is not recognized by law anywhere in the United States, anywhere in Florida, or anywhere in Walton County? I just need some clarification. Since it was upheld by the Florida Supreme Court for Florida in 1975, and is upheld in various states, it seems like it has never been upheld in Walton County because it was never allowed to be adjudicated in a court of law. It was apparently prevented from being a judicated by an "acting county attorney" in a settlement deal that was surrounded in secrecy. It seems like it has never been proven or disproven in a court of law.
[/QUOTE]
I would think it depends on a lot of the details. What was sold and when is a big one, and one that can vary tremendously even in the same areas. 

There’s tons of private beaches. Go south of Miami and see how much beach access you have. What I’ve seen is in less developed places, it’s murkier than in Clearwater. 

Think the easiest solution is for the county to use its tourist tax funds to keep buying parcels for public access. At least if it’s settled that the parcel owner gets the beach too, this approach doesn’t leave anything to interpretation.

<blockquote class="xfBb-quote" data-name="Lake View Too">Are you saying that the concept of customary use is not recognized by law anywhere in the United States, anywhere in Florida, or anywhere in Walton County? I just need some clarification. Since it was upheld by the Florida Supreme Court for Florida in 1975, and is upheld in various states, it seems like it has never been upheld in Walton County because it was never allowed to be adjudicated in a court of law. It was apparently prevented from being a judicated by an &quot;acting county attorney&quot; in a settlement deal that was surrounded in secrecy. It seems like it has never been proven or disproven in a court of law.</blockquote>I would think it depends on a lot of the details. What was sold and when is a big one, and one that can vary tremendously even in the same areas. <br />
<br />
There’s tons of private beaches. Go south of Miami and see how much beach access you have. What I’ve seen is in less developed places, it’s murkier than in Clearwater. <br />
<br />
Think the easiest solution is for the county to use its tourist tax funds to keep buying parcels for public access. At least if it’s settled that the parcel owner gets the beach too, this approach doesn’t leave anything to interpretation.

Matt J

SWGB

I find it very interesting the people who come on and champion private property rights, real estate law and the US constitution; all while forgetting about the decades of access people enjoyed without challenge creating what would normally be viewed as a prescriptive easement.

The other thing is that there also isn’t some shortage of beach for people to use. I mean PCB has tons of public beach access. Same if you go west. But instead everyone wants to fight over some of the most expensive sand in the country, cuz that’s the “it” place to be. It’s an easily solvable problem if your problem is simply being able to go to the beach.

miznotebook

An interesting fact is that Redington Beach only had to spend about $200,000 on their CU case, and part of that was paid by insurance.

Teresa

SoWal Guide

[QUOTE="Matt J, post: 967341, member: 4760"]
Not here, but another Florida county:

[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.cltampa.com/news/judge-rules-against-pinelles-county-waterfront-homeowners-in-public-beach-access-fight-18383041[/URL]
[/QUOTE]
A very small beach town with its own government. While a growing south walton remains with no government or leadership beyond general county oversight. And it shows. 

"The Town of Redington Beach, Florida, is located on a barrier island in the Gulf of Mexico. We are bordered by North Redington Beach to the north, Madeira Beach to the south, the Intracoastal Waterway on the east, and the Gulf of Mexico on the west. Redington Beach is primarily a waterfront residential community. Redington Beach is a state chartered municipality, located in Pinellas County, west of Tampa, Tampa Bay and St. Petersburg.

Our town is approximately 1 square mile in size. We boast 4 town parks, 5 public beach accesses, a causeway with benches for relaxing and fishing, and a community recreation area with basketball courts and a large children’s playground."

<blockquote class="xfBb-quote" data-name="Matt J">Not here, but another Florida county:<br />
<br />

	

	<div class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--unfurl    js-unfurl fauxBlockLink"
		data-unfurl="true" data-result-id="7548" data-result-token="1792033702:aac0123669297f096cff3c43f7847417c38bb56037f3f18c7ee25b340adcc303" data-url="https://www.cltampa.com/news/judge-rules-against-pinelles-county-waterfront-homeowners-in-public-beach-access-fight-18383041" data-host="www.cltampa.com" data-pending="false">
		<div class="contentRow">
			
				<div class="contentRow-figure contentRow-figure--fixedSmall js-unfurl-figure">
					
						<img src="https://i0.wp.com/www.cltampa.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/shutterstock_2298638511.webp?fit=1000%2C667&amp;ssl=1" loading="lazy" alt="www.cltampa.com" class="bbCodeBlockUnfurl-image" data-onerror="hide-parent"/>
					
				</div>
			
			<div class="contentRow-main">
				<h3 class="contentRow-header js-unfurl-title">
					<a href="https://www.cltampa.com/news/judge-rules-against-pinelles-county-waterfront-homeowners-in-public-beach-access-fight-18383041"
						class="link link--external fauxBlockLink-blockLink"
						target="_blank"
						rel="nofollow ugc noopener"
						data-proxy-href="">
						Judge rules against Pinellas County waterfront homeowners in public beach access fight
					</a>
				</h3>

				<div class="contentRow-snippet js-unfurl-desc">Judge says property owners must share ‘dry sand areas’</div>

				<div class="contentRow-minor contentRow-minor--hideLinks">
					<span class="js-unfurl-favicon">
						
							<img src="https://www.cltampa.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/cropped-favicon-2-32x32.png" loading="lazy" alt="www.cltampa.com" class="bbCodeBlockUnfurl-icon"
								data-onerror="hide-parent"/>
						
					</span>
					www.cltampa.com
				</div>
			</div>
		</div>
	</div>
</blockquote>A very small beach town with its own government. While a growing south walton remains with no government or leadership beyond general county oversight. And it shows. <br />
<br />
&quot;The Town of Redington Beach, Florida, is located on a barrier island in the Gulf of Mexico. We are bordered by North Redington Beach to the north, Madeira Beach to the south, the Intracoastal Waterway on the east, and the Gulf of Mexico on the west. Redington Beach is primarily a waterfront residential community. Redington Beach is a state chartered municipality, located in Pinellas County, west of Tampa, Tampa Bay and St. Petersburg.<br />
<br />
Our town is approximately 1 square mile in size. We boast 4 town parks, 5 public beach accesses, a causeway with benches for relaxing and fishing, and a community recreation area with basketball courts and a large children’s playground.&quot;

[QUOTE="Teresa, post: 967701, member: 170"]
A very small beach town with its own government. While a growing south walton remains with no government or leadership beyond general county oversight. And it shows.

"The Town of Redington Beach, Florida, is located on a barrier island in the Gulf of Mexico. We are bordered by North Redington Beach to the north, Madeira Beach to the south, the Intracoastal Waterway on the east, and the Gulf of Mexico on the west. Redington Beach is primarily a waterfront residential community. Redington Beach is a state chartered municipality, located in Pinellas County, west of Tampa, Tampa Bay and St. Petersburg.

Our town is approximately 1 square mile in size. We boast 4 town parks, 5 public beach accesses, a causeway with benches for relaxing and fishing, and a community recreation area with basketball courts and a large children’s playground."
[/QUOTE]

I understand your point, but they are also 1 square mile. South Walton is approximately 200 times their size. This might explain their lower legal costs as well.

<blockquote class="xfBb-quote" data-name="Teresa">A very small beach town with its own government. While a growing south walton remains with no government or leadership beyond general county oversight. And it shows.<br />
<br />
&quot;The Town of Redington Beach, Florida, is located on a barrier island in the Gulf of Mexico. We are bordered by North Redington Beach to the north, Madeira Beach to the south, the Intracoastal Waterway on the east, and the Gulf of Mexico on the west. Redington Beach is primarily a waterfront residential community. Redington Beach is a state chartered municipality, located in Pinellas County, west of Tampa, Tampa Bay and St. Petersburg.<br />
<br />
Our town is approximately 1 square mile in size. We boast 4 town parks, 5 public beach accesses, a causeway with benches for relaxing and fishing, and a community recreation area with basketball courts and a large children’s playground.&quot;</blockquote><br />
I understand your point, but they are also 1 square mile. South Walton is approximately 200 times their size. This might explain their lower legal costs as well.

Jenksy

[QUOTE="Jenksy, post: 967716, member: 22208"]
Walton County voted for Huckabee.
[/QUOTE]
Gaetz being the political face of the Panhandle on a national basis is frightening. This area has all the hallmarks of a moderate/libertarian utopia and yet I can’t stop running into extremists.

<blockquote class="xfBb-quote" data-name="Jenksy">Walton County voted for Huckabee.</blockquote>Gaetz being the political face of the Panhandle on a national basis is frightening. This area has all the hallmarks of a moderate/libertarian utopia and yet I can’t stop running into extremists.

Not here, but another Florida county:

[URL unfurl="true"]https://www.cltampa.com/news/judge-rules-against-pinelles-county-waterfront-homeowners-in-public-beach-access-fight-18383041[/URL]

Not here, but another Florida county:<br />
<br />

	

	<div class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--unfurl    js-unfurl fauxBlockLink"
		data-unfurl="true" data-result-id="7548" data-result-token="1792033702:aac0123669297f096cff3c43f7847417c38bb56037f3f18c7ee25b340adcc303" data-url="https://www.cltampa.com/news/judge-rules-against-pinelles-county-waterfront-homeowners-in-public-beach-access-fight-18383041" data-host="www.cltampa.com" data-pending="false">
		<div class="contentRow">
			
				<div class="contentRow-figure contentRow-figure--fixedSmall js-unfurl-figure">
					
						<img src="https://i0.wp.com/www.cltampa.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/shutterstock_2298638511.webp?fit=1000%2C667&amp;ssl=1" loading="lazy" alt="www.cltampa.com" class="bbCodeBlockUnfurl-image" data-onerror="hide-parent"/>
					
				</div>
			
			<div class="contentRow-main">
				<h3 class="contentRow-header js-unfurl-title">
					<a href="https://www.cltampa.com/news/judge-rules-against-pinelles-county-waterfront-homeowners-in-public-beach-access-fight-18383041"
						class="link link--external fauxBlockLink-blockLink"
						target="_blank"
						rel="nofollow ugc noopener"
						data-proxy-href="">
						Judge rules against Pinellas County waterfront homeowners in public beach access fight
					</a>
				</h3>

				<div class="contentRow-snippet js-unfurl-desc">Judge says property owners must share ‘dry sand areas’</div>

				<div class="contentRow-minor contentRow-minor--hideLinks">
					<span class="js-unfurl-favicon">
						
							<img src="https://www.cltampa.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/cropped-favicon-2-32x32.png" loading="lazy" alt="www.cltampa.com" class="bbCodeBlockUnfurl-icon"
								data-onerror="hide-parent"/>
						
					</span>
					www.cltampa.com
				</div>
			</div>
		</div>
	</div>

Customary use wins in Federal Court!

Grayton BeachCam

Dune Allen BeachCam

Seagrove Beach SkyCam

Inlet BeachCam

Miramar BeachCam Majestic Sun

Santa Rosa BeachCam

Walton County Fair

Sounds of Seaside

2026 SoWal Sea Turtle Nesting Season Wrapup

After Hurricane Isaias: Photos of South Walton Beaches

Cars of 30A At Alys Beach: Event Highlights & Photo Gallery

Sixth annual Run Watersound At Watersound Town Center October 24, 2026

Support Our Parks: The 2026 Friends of Camp Helen Pumpkin Patch Is Open

Annual Events and Festivals in South Walton

No beachcams yet

More cams

Include enough context for a reply on the first pass: who you are, what this is about, and anything time-sensitive we should know.

Write a clear note and we will route it fast

SoWal Contact Form

What helps the SoWal team reply on the first pass

Use these links when your request already has a clear destination.

Prefer a direct route before you write?

Use this when you are not sure where your request belongs and need the SoWal team to route it.

Questions, corrections, and quick help

Share newsworthy updates, corrections, community tips, or photography that can improve SoWal coverage.

Story tips, local leads, and photos

Reach the team for business visibility, partnership planning, or other commercial opportunities.

Listings, sponsorships, and business requests

Use this path for media coordination, press follow-ups, or requests that need a communications contact.

Press outreach and interview requests

Tell us what you need and how to reach you.

Send your note here and the SoWal team will route it appropriately.

Choose the quickest route for your message

Forum account areas

Log in to view member profile, alerts, messages, watched content, bookmarks, preferences, and staff tools.

Member-only forum areas use your SoWal forum account.

Use your forum username or email to post, reply, follow threads, and manage your account.

Log in to the forum

Log in to the SoWal forum

Find people and visit their public forum profiles.

Members

Enter the six-digit code sent to {email}.

Check your email

Join the conversation

Welcome to SoWal

Sign in to SoWal

Signature preview

Ads support our local stories, BeachCams, and community guides. If you use an ad blocker, allow SoWal, then check again.

Help keep SoWal local

Your feedback helps us make SoWal better.

How was this story?

Get local stories, events, and South Walton highlights in your inbox.

Stay close to the coast

Choose whether SoWal may use optional cookies. Necessary cookies keep the site working.

Your privacy, your choice

Site navigation

Submenu

Bite-sized stories, curated itineraries, and community events delivered to your inbox on the regular.

Customary use wins in Federal Court!

Latest conversations

Write a reply

2026 SoWal Sea Turtle Nesting Season Wrapup

After Hurricane Isaias: Photos of South Walton Beaches

Cars of 30A At Alys Beach: Event Highlights & Photo Gallery

Sixth annual Run Watersound At Watersound Town Center October 24, 2026