DAVE RAUSHKOLB:
Customary use shouldnʼt
require defending
Most Popular Our Picks
Hide caption
Beachgoers enjoy the sun and sand at Miramar Baeach
near the Whaleʼs Tail restaurant. [FILE PHOTO/DAILY
NEWS]
By Dave Rauschkolb | Guest columnist
Posted Jun 24, 2018 at 10Q00 AM Updated
Jun 27, 2018 at 12Q52 PM
This is fundamental; our beaches are the
prime attraction in Florida. They are the
principal reason most of us live here and why
most people choose to vacation here with
their families. This is a case where stating an
obvious truth is essential. Privatizing any
beach in Florida is an attack on the economic
well being of beach communities and our
quality of life. I believe beach access and use
should be sacred and protected.
This overreaching and arbitrary legislation will
allow for American citizens to be forcibly
removed for trespassing from so called,
“private beaches.” We must all take heed
because a very slippery slope has begun. Any
Coastal beach town in Florida could be next.
One may ask, how do you defend customary
use in the face of “private owners?” I shake
my head in disbelief that this even needs
defending. For me, it is like someone stating
“the oxygen above my home is private and
mine alone.”
Since humans have walked the earth our
beaches have been a shared resource used
for fishing, recreation, travel, access and play.
All the beaches of Florida have been
uninterrupted in their human use for many
centuries. This doctrine of “customary use”
gives all of us reasonable access and
enjoyment on our beaches. Up until a few
years ago this was never in question. So now,
suddenly, after hundreds of years of use,
beachfront owners of Walton County and the
Legislature are allowed to say no? I beg to
differ, and we all should.
Frankly, I find the notion of a “private beach” a
foreign concept; an oxymoron. I donʼt think
this is an extreme view at all, and I believe
most people agree. When someone
purchases a beachfront home, they risk the
wrath of hurricanes, but the reward is the
view and a shorter walk to the beach than
most of us. Thatʼs it.
Much of the problem of use and access stems
from complaints of bad behavior behind
peopleʼs homes. In deference to beachfront
homeownersʼ complaints, I agree that certain
unsavory activities that may occur on the
beaches must be regulated. The proper
enforcement of laws should be all the
insurance beachfront owners need to ensure
peaceable, beach activities behind their
homes. Simple law and order already regulate
beaches all over the world.
It is critical that the sandy areas of Floridaʼs
beaches are open for all to enjoy; our touristdriven
economy is dependent on this
perception and reality. Any threat to beach
use is a threat to our local and statewide
economy. Perception is everything when it
comes to peopleʼs decision to choose a
tourist destination or a property purchase. If
they know a beach is not easily accessible or
usable, they will be less apt to book or
purchase property. Would you? Private
beaches are in direct opposition to the image
and perception of Florida as both a tourist
destination and a quality place to live.
Beginning July 1, some county beach access
bordered by “private property” will only allow
someone to walk to the water and set up a
beach chair on a 10 foot strip of sand. You
may walk along the water in the wet sand but
you could be arrested for stopping on the
wrong beach. This is wrong on so many
levels. “No trespassing” signs and ropes are
showing up everywhere already. A simple,
conflict-free, fun day at the beach with your
kids is now at risk. I think it is terrible. As a
father of two young children and a business
owner in South Walton County for 32 years, I
take that loss of quality of life and risk to our
economy very seriously.
Customary use, which is the law of the sand in
Hawaii, Oregon and Texas, grants permanent
public access based on ancient, peaceful,
uninterrupted and reasonable use of the
beach by the public. One would hope Florida
could adopt a similar law. We should work
together to follow these 3 other Stateʼs lead
and make all of Floridaʼs beaches a shared
resource for all of us in perpetuity.
Sign up for daily e-mail
Wake up to the dayʼs top news, delivered to
your inbox
Most Popular Stories
Trending Articles
Replies
64Beach Fanatic
But isn’t the beach in front of the “private accesses” actually PUBLIC property according to the customary use concept? Isn’t that what the customary use debate is all about? I’m not taking about “private access” pavilions, I’m talking about the sandy beach in front of them. Can I “sit on a towel” any of the dry sand there?Stop over thinking it and catch some rays.
Beach Lover
But isn’t the beach in front of the “private accesses” actually PUBLIC property according to the customary use concept? Isn’t that what the customary use debate is all about? I’m not taking about “private access” pavilions, I’m talking about the sandy beach in front of them. Can I “sit on a towel” any of the dry sand there?
Beginning midnight tonight, you may not do so. Doing so after that is trespassing. From the Gulf to th4e MHWL or ECL is public. Private beach landward of MHWL or ECL is off limits to the general public.
Beach Fanatic
So perhaps I should ask Dave:Starbucks would..all welcome to use wifi and bathrooms and buy nothing..gotta be PC.you know
Could my family and I come and park our vehicle in a public parking space near the beachfront restaurant and then go set up our chairs and umbrellas in front of the beachfront restaurant and spend the day there? Would the beachfront restaurant and its surrounding community allow us to do that even if we are not eating there or staying there?
Beach Fanatic
Beginning midnight tonight, you may not do so. Doing so after that is trespassing. From the Gulf to th4e MHWL or ECL is public. Private beach landward of MHWL or ECL is off limits to the general public.If there's no plan to enforce .. Who cares?
Beach Lover
If there's no plan to enforce .. Who cares?I suspect you will find there is a difference between no enforcement and no arrests for civil trespass. WCSO says it will respond to such calls and will try to mediate on-site. I suspect most trespassers will not argue with an armed deputy who tells them they are trespassing and will peaceful leave as required by law as pointed out by the deputy. The few who do not can reasonably be expected to not make the deputies happy by refusing to abide by the law, and personalities so disposed are likely to offend the sensibilities of the deputies by being confrontational. These few risk arrest and may well suffer same.
Beach Lover
For those that contend that the change in law will negatively impact property values and local businesses, do you think that the constant and daily bombardment of dire postings here and on Facebook help property values and local businesses in the near term? Does scare mongering really help?
I support Customary Use, but like it or not, this will ultimately be decided by the Courts, likely several years from now. It is what it is, adjust to the practicalities of today, make the best of a situation out of our personal control and hope for the best.
I don’t see how crying wolf on a daily basis helps, and in fact, likely just scares tourists away. It’s not an ideal situation, but sometimes you need to make lemonade out of lemons until the situation settles.
I support Customary Use, but like it or not, this will ultimately be decided by the Courts, likely several years from now. It is what it is, adjust to the practicalities of today, make the best of a situation out of our personal control and hope for the best.
I don’t see how crying wolf on a daily basis helps, and in fact, likely just scares tourists away. It’s not an ideal situation, but sometimes you need to make lemonade out of lemons until the situation settles.
Beach Lover
I suspect you will find there is a difference between no enforcement and no arrests for civil trespass. WCSO says it will respond to such calls and will try to mediate on-site. I suspect most trespassers will not argue with an armed deputy who tells them they are trespassing and will peaceful leave as required by law as pointed out by the deputy. The few who do not can reasonably be expected to not make the deputies happy by refusing to abide by the law, and personalities so disposed are likely to offend the sensibilities of the deputies by being confrontational. These few risk arrest and may well suffer same.Wherever people are told to leave, 100 customary users should show up within the hour and stand their sand.
Beach Comber
#341
This is all I see when reading some of these posts. So sad that we all live in one of the most beautiful places on earth and some have nothing better to do but b**ch and moan.
Hey Dave, how about we organize a sit in on the wet sand area at Vizcaya at Dune Allen. Perhaps we can all enjoy a cool beverage at the waters edge with Mr. Hackmeyer and his paid security "force."
Hey Dave, how about we organize a sit in on the wet sand area at Vizcaya at Dune Allen. Perhaps we can all enjoy a cool beverage at the waters edge with Mr. Hackmeyer and his paid security "force."
Beach Lover
This is all I see when reading some of these posts. So sad that we all live in one of the most beautiful places on earth and some have nothing better to do but b**ch and moan.Better to b**ch and moan, than to act on it constructing unnecessary drama. You start out all sweetness and light, then you dim.
Hey Dave, how about we organize a sit in on the wet sand area at Vizcaya at Dune Allen. Perhaps we can all enjoy a cool beverage at the waters edge with Mr. Hackmeyer and his paid security "force."
Beach Lover
As someone who was arrested twice for trespassing(younger years) and nearly arrested for trespassing a dozen or more times(still younger years), if the property line is not clearly marked with a no trespassing sign, it's not enforceable.........just saying.
Beach Fanatic
As someone who was arrested twice for trespassing(younger years) and nearly arrested for trespassing a dozen or more times(still younger years), if the property line is not clearly marked with a no trespassing sign, it's not enforceable.........just saying.Private property is private property. Maybe you mean that in the case of beachfront the lines between private and public are difficult to discern without markings.
SoWal Insider
Starbucks would..all welcome to use wifi and bathrooms and buy nothing..gotta be PC.you knowThese men would differ.
Two black men were arrested in a Philadelphia Starbucks for doing nothing
Beach Fanatic
These men would differ.Civil people dont take this BAIT....
Two black men were arrested in a Philadelphia Starbucks for doing nothing
Beach Fanatic
#401
Indian Rock Beach, Fl
Beach Fanatic
View attachment 71407Remind me to stay away from those people and that place.
Indian Rock Beach, Fl
Beach Comber
Nothing screams "Welcome to 30A, our beautiful beaches and friendly locals" more than stay away and private security.
View attachment 71411
View attachment 71411
Beach Crab
Is it possible that the area is being over-marketed and over-developed?
When county commissioners, tourism officials and local business owners start talking about the need for another north-south access road cutting through a pristine state forest alongside wetlands and several osprey nests in order to alleviate traffic, I guess it’s too late to realize that all of the heavy traffic may be due to too much high-density development between 30A and Choctawhatchee Bay.
And that over-development of high density residential/rental areas leads to more and more people on the beaches - beaches which are a limited resource especially in the areas with dedicated public parking and public access, therefore you are going to have inland renters (and residents) faced with crowded, territorial beaches when they come to sit on a towel or to set up a bunch of chairs/umbrellas/tents in adjacent spillover areas in front of private homes/communities.
How did restaurants and local businesses survive before TDC marketing was geographically expanded to every market that had an airport connecting to ECP? Many of the local restaurants (which my family and I enjoy and support) have had 2-hour waits at notable restaurants during peak season for 10-15 years, but I’m hearing that some of them want more high density development, they want Hampton Inn by Eastern Lake, they want it to be “more like Destin or PCB.” Why?
I do know that the state park beaches are some of the most beautiful, unspoiled beaches in the area and day use fees have been waived the last few summers. This seems like an option to avoid all of the private beach wars. But what about some of the larger communities along 30A? Would it be possible for Rosemary Beach, Alys Beach, Seaside, Watersound and Watercolor to open up their parking and beach access to the public? This may have been discussed before, so I’m thinking out loud. It seems like most of the property boundary conflicts involve single residence beachfront homeowners and smaller community HOAs.
I’d love to hear from all sides!
Excellent points on the ill effects of marketing a limited asset which is already saturated with visitors. Seaside's largest, central beach access -- about 30% of SS's total beach -- is and has always been open to the public (including the dry sand). Seaside haters don't seem to acknowledge this. The privately owned SS residential beaches, for which owners paid steep premiums for dry sand the county recorded as non-public, flank the SS public beach The human detritus left daily on the public portion -- hypodermic needles, condoms, animal waste, trash -- is only one reason why the homeowners will maintain their property in its private, deeded private, state. Parking: Seaside is already WAY overcapacity, so that's not a possibility. There is, however, the large county lot adjacent on the west border of SS and parking if it can be found in the business areas and along 30-A in SS.
Beach Fanatic
Nothing screams "Welcome to 30A, our beautiful beaches and friendly locals" more than stay away and private security.How can they keep Beach Code Enforcement trucks from patrolling that stretch of beach? Local county laws don't include Vizcaya?
View attachment 71411
Beach Lover
How can they keep Beach Code Enforcement trucks from patrolling that stretch of beach? Local county laws don't include Vizcaya?Can you keep them from crossing your lawn? What if they had to in order to get to a heart attack victim?
Beach Comber
[QUOTE="The human detritus left daily on the public portion -- hypodermic needles, condoms, animal waste, trash........"[/QUOTE]
He said for dramatic effect.....
He said for dramatic effect.....
Beach Fanatic
#472
Nothing screams "Welcome to 30A, our beautiful beaches and friendly locals" more than stay away and private security.It's legally Vizcaya' s beautiful beachfront property; not "ours". If uninvited people would respect property rights and not expect rights they do not have - property owners may be more willing to share but that is the owners legal option and if you do not respect that, there are legal consequences - if dutifully enforced.
Emotional ignorance of the facts and law, the vilification of lawful property rights, and self-righteous commissioners and public are the ones creating the misinformation that is the cause of this problem and why the Florida legislature created HB631 now the Florida Statute 163.035 that defines due process rights for property owners BEFORE a local government unilaterally declares private property right of private enjoyment is null and void.
Vizcaya has two public “Beach Access Easements” they own on both sides of their private beachfront property. By definition “Beach Access Easement – the right for neighboring residents to access a public beach, even if the access crosses private property.”
Easement - Definition, Types, Processes and Examples
I’m no attorney but I can educate myself with a little effort. So unless there is some other legal document describing otherwise. The beach access easement is a Right-of-Way to the public beach - which is the beach foreshore seaward of Vizcaya MHWL property boundary. There are no public rights to occupy an easement; just cross it. Ask TDC beach operations Brian Kellenberger. Brian@visitsouthwalton
Maybe I'm wrong about the law but you need to prove it with facts and not emotional ignorance. The blame for this mess is squarely the Walton Commissioners for failing to manage growth in Walton County and now want a quick fix at private property owner's expense.
Walton commissioners and TDC have intentionally not informed the public of the beachfront private property fee simple or easements right-of way rights or that 75% of Walton beaches are private beaches the public must respect. Assistant State Attorney, Greg Anchors, and Walton Sheriff have made political decisions and failed in their duties to enforce the law in affect today and should be held accountable.
I do not blame Vizcaya for hiring security guards to protect their lawful property rights; Constitutional officers of Florida and Walton County won’t.
Edited
Beach Fanatic
How can they keep Beach Code Enforcement trucks from patrolling that stretch of beach? Local county laws don't include Vizcaya?Walton County has to obey private property laws just like everyone else - unless law enforcement (not code enforcement) has probable cause before entering private property (just like at your house) or life or health emergency.
Beach Fanatic
Can you keep them from crossing your lawn? What if they had to in order to get to a heart attack victim?He said for dramatic effect ... Come on dude. Show us you have some brains.
Beach Lover
It's legally Vizcaya' s beautiful beachfront property; not "ours". If uninvited people would respect property rights and not expect rights they do not have - property owners may be more willing to share but that is the owners legal option and if you do not respect that, there are legal consequences - if dutifully enforced.Appears you've revealed yourself as the angry Vizcaya protector of freedom for AMERICA! Have you had to hit anyone with a baseball bet yet. Or does yelling and cussing do the trick? Your lawyer advise you to hire a guard to keep you out of jail?
Emotional ignorance of the facts and law, the vilification of lawful property rights, and self-righteous commissioners and public are the ones creating the misinformation that is the cause of this problem and why the Florida legislature created HB631 now the Florida Statute 163.035 that defines due process rights for property owners BEFORE a local government unilaterally declares private property right of private enjoyment is null and void.
Vizcaya has two public “Beach Access Easements” they own on both sides of their private beachfront property. By definition “Beach Access Easement – the right for neighboring residents to access a public beach, even if the access crosses private property.”
Easement - Definition, Types, Processes and Examples
I’m no attorney but I can educate myself with a little effort. So unless there is some other legal document describing otherwise. The beach access easement is a Right-of-Way to the public beach - which is the beach foreshore seaward of Vizcaya MHWL property boundary. There are no public rights to occupy an easement; just cross it. Ask TDC beach operations Brian Kellenberger. Brian@visitsouthwalton
Maybe I'm wrong about the law but you need to prove it with facts and not emotional ignorance. The blame for this mess is squarely the Walton Commissioners for failing to manage growth in Walton County and now want a quick fix at private property owner's expense.
Walton commissioners and TDC have intentionally not informed the public of the beachfront private property fee simple or easements right-of way rights or that 75% of Walton beaches are private beaches the public must respect. Assistant State Attorney, Greg Anchors, and Walton Sheriff have made political decisions and failed in their duties to enforce the law in affect today and should be held accountable.
I do not blame Vizcaya for hiring security guards to protect their lawful property rights; Constitutional officers of Florida and Walton County won’t.
View attachment 71412 View attachment 71413
Beach Fanatic
Appears you've revealed yourself as the angry Vizcaya protector of freedom for AMERICA! Have you had to hit anyone with a baseball bet yet. Or does yelling and cussing do the trick? Your lawyer advise you to hire a guard to keep you out of jail?Nope. Wrong again. Just an informed and knowledgeable private property owner that does the homework and knows the facts. What facts do you offer or is childish taunts all you and Dave Rauschkolb have?
Checking your forum account
Please wait while we verify your forum account.