How do we compare stock values versus real estate values? The nature of the investment is different. Stocks are available everywhere to buy and sell in an instant. Real estate is local in nature and not[usually] sold in an instant. Unless you give it away. It seems everyone wants to compare owning a piece of dirt with a piece of paper, and I think its apples and oranges. Land is flexible in that you can develop it and live in it , rent it, do nothing and hold it, or you can do like eveyone seems intent on doing and treating it like paper and selling it ASAP. It sure is fun to talk about however. I just think many boomers look at property in a one dimensional way: a commodity to trade.