Welcome to America

Congratulations Daniel Cameron!

BREAKING: First African-American Wins Kentucky AG Race. He’s A Republican.

Attorney Daniel Cameron became the first Republican elected to be Kentucky Attorney General in more than 70 years on Tuesday night and became the first African-American to ever be elected to the position.

Cameron, 33, also became “the first African-American voted individually to state-wide office in Kentucky history,”

Because white Republicans are all racists right? How is that the Democrats never got a black person elected to that position?

Because white Republicans are all racists right? How is that the Democrats never got a black person elected to that position?

Because they were too busy working on this:

Andy Beshear claims victory in Kentucky governor race, Matt Bevin says he is not conceding - CNNPolitics

Your religion is your business not mine. I am only anti-religion when Bible thumping a-holes want to force their religious beliefs on everyone, but you are avoiding the facts. Are trump and his minions attacking the credibility of everyone who testifies under oath he was trying to extort Ukraine, yes or no?

I was just setting the record straight. I respect whatever you or anyone believe or don't believe.

Would you believe that I beat up (figuratively) on my "Trump forever" church going folks? Its a peeve of mine that some of them have gone all in on Trump the man but to each his own.

Your yes or no: I have no idea. But at least two of the "witnesses" have had to admit that they did not directly witness what they said at first. Look, we all know what's going on, and what's going to happen. We knew the day the D's won the House. I would just as soon have the vote tomorrow, and get on with life. But that won't happen when all these Reps and Senators can have TV time. We have an election coming in less than a year and they want soundbites!!

I was just setting the record straight. I respect whatever you or anyone believe or don't believe.

Would you believe that I beat up (figuratively) on my "Trump forever" church going folks? Its a peeve of mine that some of them have gone all in on Trump the man but to each his own.

Your yes or no: I have no idea. But at least two of the "witnesses" have had to admit that they did not directly witness what they said at first. Look, we all know what's going on, and what's going to happen. We knew the day the D's won the House. I would just as soon have the vote tomorrow, and get on with life. But that won't happen when all these Reps and Senators can have TV time. We have an election coming in less than a year and they want soundbites!!

You have no idea if trump et al. are attacking the witnesses coming froward? Change news sources.

Many folks are convicted of crimes on circumstantial evidence. The Presidents ever changing tale, and it is everyone else's fault mentality, fake news banner and everyone who is coming forward is a Never Trumper is both sad and funny. I am awed that so many defend their vote for the President. Of course, I am truly a never Trumper but I do believe in the rules and believe in accountability. I believe the Impeachment process should go forward. I hope the House has better prosecutors than Marsha Clark and Christopher Darden.

Congratulations Daniel Cameron!

BREAKING: First African-American Wins Kentucky AG Race. He’s A Republican.

Attorney Daniel Cameron became the first Republican elected to be Kentucky Attorney General in more than 70 years on Tuesday night and became the first African-American to ever be elected to the position.

Cameron, 33, also became “the first African-American voted individually to state-wide office in Kentucky history,”

Because white Republicans are all racists right? How is that the Democrats never got a black person elected to that position?

No, most white racists are republicans.- fixed it for you.
It works both ways, what haven’t Republicans elected a black to that position before and why are you so obsessed with a candidates race?
Democrats elect on qualification not race that is why there is such a diversity of race, ethnicity, and gender among the Dems. presently serving.

Many folks are convicted of crimes on circumstantial evidence. The Presidents ever changing tale, and it is everyone else's fault mentality, fake news banner and everyone who is coming forward is a Never Trumper is both sad and funny. I am awed that so many defend their vote for the President. Of course, I am truly a never Trumper but I do believe in the rules and believe in accountability. I believe the Impeachment process should go forward. I hope the House has better prosecutors than Marsha Clark and Christopher Darden.

IMHO Clark and Darden proved their case, but they had the equivalent of today’s Republican senate as a jury.

ABC says interview with Epstein accuser wasn't ready to air

Robach said in her statement Tuesday that she had been referring in the video to what Giuffre had said in the interview, not what ABC News had verified through its own reporting. Corroborating evidence of the type the network sought could include interviews with people familiar with Giuffre’s allegations or records that would verify she was at the places the alleged sex acts took place.

“The interview itself, while I was disappointed it didn’t air, didn’t meet our standards,” Robach said Tuesday. “In the years since no one has ever told me or the team to stop reporting on Jeffrey Epstein, and we have continued to aggressively pursue this important story.”

Many folks are convicted of crimes on circumstantial evidence. The Presidents ever changing tale, and it is everyone else's fault mentality, fake news banner and everyone who is coming forward is a Never Trumper is both sad and funny. I am awed that so many defend their vote for the President. Of course, I am truly a never Trumper but I do believe in the rules and believe in accountability. I believe the Impeachment process should go forward. I hope the House has better prosecutors than Marsha Clark and Christopher Darden.

Right, and I don't think the burden of proof is the same as in a criminal trial. I believe a greater amount of subjectivity is to be expected in an impeachment process than in a criminal trial. President is essentially being fired, and the Senate has the final word on the matter. How can anyone not take into account the President's bombastic abusive ramblings that have been occuring during the process? It would be a moral failing for the house not to impeach him. I feel the same about his removal by the Senate, but my expectations are very low.

IMHO Clark and Darden proved their case, but they had the equivalent of today’s Republican senate as a jury.

I thought the system worked as it should have. I believed Simpson was guilty, I don't believe they proved it beyond a reasonable doubt.

I thought the system worked as it should have. I believed Simpson was guilty, I don't believe they proved it beyond a reasonable doubt.

Fair enough.

CIA staff complained about Obama White House's political correctness, new book claims

Next thing they said was that, in the previous administration, they spent a lot of time in the White House doing nonstop PC [political correctness] meetings.

They would have a meeting every week, and at the conclusion of the meeting there was always the suggestion, ‘Let’s meet again in two weeks.’ Nothing was ever resolved. Nothing was ever good enough."

I see where the Treason Trio gets their laziness and lack of comprehension, PC stands for principles committee in the context of WH meetings not political correctness.

ABC says interview with Epstein accuser wasn't ready to air

You obviously have not listened to Amy Robach's own words. "it was ready to go". "I tried for three years and was turned away the whole time". With that damning of a story, why wouldn't ABC cross reference, do a deep dive investigation to get the story "ready to air".

What's striking is the contortions you have to bend yourself into defending a broken, lying propaganda "news source", ABC. If they would have broken the story three years ago, tell me poppa how many teenage girls could have been spared the torture, rape, and permanent scaring. What's the number?

I thought the system worked as it should have. I believed Simpson was guilty, I don't believe they proved it beyond a reasonable doubt.

Who Was On The O.J. Simpson Trial Jury? Meet The 12 People Who Found Him Not Guilty

"By the end of the trial, the jury composition broke down as nine black jurors, one hispanic and two white. There were 10 women and two men. Two of the jurors had college degrees, nine had graduated high school and one had no diploma."

Does it make more sense to you now?

Now....we are starting to get to the bottom of this. Hopefully.

Obamagate: How Much Did He Know About Brennan's CIA Task Force?
Written by Daniel McAdams
Wednesday November 6, 2019

Former CIA officer Phil Giraldi joins today's Liberty Report to discuss the breaking scandal over the Obama Administration's intelligence leaders and the plot against candidate Trump. Then-CIA Director John Brennan reportedly set up a CIA task force early in 2016 to surveil and even conduct covert actions against candidate and then President Trump. Are we witnessing a "deep state" coup against the president? Will heads roll? Was Obama at the center of the operation?

Dearest Leader of the Banned,

Here is your daily dose of conspiracy theories. Enjoy and have a wonderful day!

Who Was On The O.J. Simpson Trial Jury? Meet The 12 People Who Found Him Not Guilty

"By the end of the trial, the jury composition broke down as nine black jurors, one hispanic and two white. There were 10 women and two men. Two of the jurors had college degrees, nine had graduated high school and one had no diploma."

Does it make more sense to you now?

Please explain it?

Graham: Trump administration 'incapable of forming a quid pro quo,' Ukraine policy 'incoherent' - CNNPolitics

Well ain't this a fine kettle of fish. The ineptitude defense! Does Senator Graham have no shame?

Graham: Trump administration 'incapable of forming a quid pro quo,' Ukraine policy 'incoherent' - CNNPolitics

Well ain't this a fine kettle of fish. The ineptitude defense! Does Senator Graham have no shame?

That's as weak as the "she's not my type" rape defense.

Dearest Leader of the Banned,

Here is your daily dose of conspiracy theories. Enjoy and have a wonderful day!

I like the fact that I don't have to work too hard or resort to hyperbole and special effects. All I have to do is provide a link to Trump's Twitter feed.

You obviously have not listened to Amy Robach's own words. "it was ready to go". "I tried for three years and was turned away the whole time". With that damning of a story, why wouldn't ABC cross reference, do a deep dive investigation to get the story "ready to air".

What's striking is the contortions you have to bend yourself into defending a broken, lying propaganda "news source", ABC. If they would have broken the story three years ago, tell me poppa how many teenage girls could have been spared the torture, rape, and permanent scaring. What's the number?

Here is her words again

The interview itself, while I was disappointed it didn’t air, didn’t meet our standards,” Robach said Tuesday. “In the years since no one has ever told me or the team to stop reporting on Jeffrey Epstein, and we have continued to aggressively pursue this important story.”

Now I don’t watch ABC or give two shts about them, but why do you believe network news is more responsible for law enforcement than say, law enforcement who gave him a sweetheart deal?

Here is her words again

You are posting what Amy said on Tuesday, the day after ABC was cold busted. Turns out, the vaunted New York Times sat on it too. Even the uber liberal NPR had a long episode questioning why the big MSM groups sat on it. Well, in the NYT case, all it took was a five-figure donation to the key reporters favorite charity.
Here's what Amy Robach said on tape/video:

"I've had this story for three years, I've had this interview with (Epstein Victim) Virginia Roberts. We would not put in on the air. First of all, I was asked who is Jeffrey Epstein? No one knows who this is. It's a stupid story."

"Then the Palace (British) found out we had her allegations about Prince Andrew and threatened us a million different ways. We (ABC) were so afraid we wouldn't be able to interview Kate and Will that we, that also quashed the story."

"And then Alan Dershowitz was also implicated in, cause of the planes she (Virginia Roberts) told me everything. She had pictures, she had everything. She was in hiding for 12 years. We convinced her to come out. We convinced her to talk to us. It was unbelievable what we had Clinton (Bill), we had everything."

Off camera producer: "But the creepy thing is we would make access to all these high profile people".

Robach: "Well I got a little concerne WHY I couldn't get it on".

There's more, but this is enough for now.

I tried for three years to get it on to no avail. And now it's coming out like its these new revelations."

"Like every day I more and more pissed cause I'm just like, what we had was unreal. Other women backing it up"

"Brad Edwards, (victim) Virginia Roberts attorney, three years ago saying, like, we, there will come a day when we realize that Jeffrey Epstein was the most prolific pedophile this country has ever known. I had it all....three years ago."

White Power

Mark your calendar folks!
Rep. Matt Gaetz to Host Donald Trump Jr. for Book Signing in Sandestin