Replies
15,441
Beach Fanatic
Jordan: You didn’t listen in on President Trump and Zelensky’s call?
Taylor: I did not.
Jordan: You’ve never talked with Chief of Staff Mulvaney?
Taylor: I never did.
Jordan: You’ve never met the president?
Taylor: That’s correct.
Jordan: You had three meetings again with Zelenksy and it didn’t come up … and President Zelensky never made an announcement. … and you’re their star witness.
Taylor: I did not.
Jordan: You’ve never talked with Chief of Staff Mulvaney?
Taylor: I never did.
Jordan: You’ve never met the president?
Taylor: That’s correct.
Jordan: You had three meetings again with Zelenksy and it didn’t come up … and President Zelensky never made an announcement. … and you’re their star witness.
Beach Fanatic
Jordan continued to hammer Taylor, saying, “President Zelensky had to commit to an investigation of the Bidens before the aid got released and the aid got released and he didn’t commit to an investigation.”
“I was not wrong about what I told you because that is what I heard,” Taylor quickly responded. “That’s all I’ve said, I’ve told you what I heard.”
“And that’s the point,” Jordan fired back. “What you heard did not happen. It didn’t happen. You had three meetings with the guy, he could have told you, he didn’t announce that he was going to do an investigation before the aid happened.”
“I was not wrong about what I told you because that is what I heard,” Taylor quickly responded. “That’s all I’ve said, I’ve told you what I heard.”
“And that’s the point,” Jordan fired back. “What you heard did not happen. It didn’t happen. You had three meetings with the guy, he could have told you, he didn’t announce that he was going to do an investigation before the aid happened.”
Beach Fanatic
CNN legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin, have pointed out, one glaring problem with Taylor’s testimony, as well as the second witness interviewed Wednesday, is that he had no direct contact with Trump about the issue, thus any claims he presented about the president’s actions and intentions are second-hand at best. In one of his questions for Taylor, Ratcliffe noted this problem while also presenting first-hand, direct quotes from the other world leader involved in the situation, Zelensky himself.
“President Zelesnky went on to confirm a number of things: that there was no pressure, that there were no conditions, that there were no threats on military aid, that there was no pressure or conditions to investigate Burisma or the 2016 election, that there was no blackmail, that there was no corruption of any kind during the July 25th call,”
“President Zelesnky went on to confirm a number of things: that there was no pressure, that there were no conditions, that there were no threats on military aid, that there was no pressure or conditions to investigate Burisma or the 2016 election, that there was no blackmail, that there was no corruption of any kind during the July 25th call,”
Beach Fanatic
RATCLIFFE: Again, from his official press release: “Therefore, there was no blackmail because it was not the subject of our conversation with the President of the United States. There were no conditions on the investigation, either because of arms or the situation around Burisma company.”
[Zelensky] told Reuters, “There was no blackmail.” He told the L.A. Times, “There was no pressure from the United States.” He told Japan’s Kyoto News, “I was never pressured, and there were no conditions being imposed.” He told ABC News and the BBC, “I’m against corruption. This is not corruption; it was just a call.”
The Ukrainian President stood in front of a world press and repeatedly, consistently, over and over again, interview after interview, said he had no knowledge of military aid being withheld, meaning no quid pro quo, no pressure, no demands, no threats, no blackmail, nothing corrupt.
And unlike the first 45 minutes we heard from the Democrats today, that’s not second-hand information, that’s not hearsay, it’s not what someone overheard Ambassador Sondland say. That was his direct testimony.
[Zelensky] told Reuters, “There was no blackmail.” He told the L.A. Times, “There was no pressure from the United States.” He told Japan’s Kyoto News, “I was never pressured, and there were no conditions being imposed.” He told ABC News and the BBC, “I’m against corruption. This is not corruption; it was just a call.”
The Ukrainian President stood in front of a world press and repeatedly, consistently, over and over again, interview after interview, said he had no knowledge of military aid being withheld, meaning no quid pro quo, no pressure, no demands, no threats, no blackmail, nothing corrupt.
And unlike the first 45 minutes we heard from the Democrats today, that’s not second-hand information, that’s not hearsay, it’s not what someone overheard Ambassador Sondland say. That was his direct testimony.
SoWal Insider
Jordan continued to hammer Taylor, saying, “President Zelensky had to commit to an investigation of the Bidens before the aid got released and the aid got released and he didn’t commit to an investigation.”Fail!
“I was not wrong about what I told you because that is what I heard,” Taylor quickly responded. “That’s all I’ve said, I’ve told you what I heard.”
“And that’s the point,” Jordan fired back. “What you heard did not happen. It didn’t happen. You had three meetings with the guy, he could have told you, he didn’t announce that he was going to do an investigation before the aid happened.”
Ukraine’s Zelensky Bowed to Trump’s Demands, Until Luck Spared Him
Beach Fanatic
The fireman should ignore the alarm since it’s simple hearsay. The alarm has no first hand knowledge of a fire since it received the information from the smoke detector.I can assure you in my former profession we go even if it is a false alarm and investigate.
SoWal Insider
Jordan: You didn’t listen in on President Trump and Zelensky’s call?
Taylor: I did not.
Jordan: You’ve never talked with Chief of Staff Mulvaney?
Taylor: I never did.
Jordan: You’ve never met the president?
Taylor: That’s correct.
Jordan: You had three meetings again with Zelenksy and it didn’t come up … and President Zelensky never made an announcement. … and you’re their star witness.
Jordan continued to hammer Taylor, saying, “President Zelensky had to commit to an investigation of the Bidens before the aid got released and the aid got released and he didn’t commit to an investigation.”
“I was not wrong about what I told you because that is what I heard,” Taylor quickly responded. “That’s all I’ve said, I’ve told you what I heard.”
“And that’s the point,” Jordan fired back. “What you heard did not happen. It didn’t happen. You had three meetings with the guy, he could have told you, he didn’t announce that he was going to do an investigation before the aid happened.”
CNN legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin, have pointed out, one glaring problem with Taylor’s testimony, as well as the second witness interviewed Wednesday, is that he had no direct contact with Trump about the issue, thus any claims he presented about the president’s actions and intentions are second-hand at best. In one of his questions for Taylor, Ratcliffe noted this problem while also presenting first-hand, direct quotes from the other world leader involved in the situation, Zelensky himself.If you want to hear from first hand accounts ask your prez to order them to testify instead of ignoring subpoenas. Let the country witness how many will fall on their swords for this lying prick.
“President Zelesnky went on to confirm a number of things: that there was no pressure, that there were no conditions, that there were no threats on military aid, that there was no pressure or conditions to investigate Burisma or the 2016 election, that there was no blackmail, that there was no corruption of any kind during the July 25th call,”
Beach Fanatic
Fail!You can’t be serious. Please give me the date Ukraine announced the investigations and the date aid was released.
Ukraine’s Zelensky Bowed to Trump’s Demands, Until Luck Spared Him
SoWal Insider
I can assure you in my former profession we go even if it is a false alarm and investigate.This I know, my father in-law was a lieutenant in the Memphis Fire Department.
I was using trumper logic to explain the illogical.
SoWal Insider
You can’t be serious. Please give me the date Ukraine announced the investigations and the date aid was released.Oh sht! We’re back to a lack of comprehension.
Beach Fanatic
Oh sht! We’re back to a lack of comprehension.Glad you realize your comprehension is lacking
Beach Fanatic
You have no answer. Please remain in this mindset. Do not alter your reasoning no matter what facts are presented.Yes fdxusmc ,gave you all the answers you need,but please do remain in your dreams. I'll keep my mindset. Thanks best advice I've heard from you.
Beach Fanatic
I wonder Misters Nunes, Graham, Jordan, and others, if your grandchildren or other descendants will eventually want to change their names or will just be bullied throughout their lifetimes for being familially connected to one of the people responsible for bring down our republic, the USA. You are making Russia great again.Your in a dream world,did you see how Schiff was acting. I'd definitely delete your post so your grandkids don't see it. They are the ones that I would worry about. Well just see what happens?
I'll repost to the rabid Trump "base" again and get the heck out of the way:
SoWal Insider
I wonder Misters Nunes, Graham, Jordan, and others, if your grandchildren or other descendants will eventually want to change their names or will just be bullied throughout their lifetimes for being familially connected to one of the people responsible for bring down our republic, the USA. You are making Russia great again.It will not happen, but it would be interesting to witness how history records this period.
I'll repost to the rabid Trump "base" again and get the heck out of the way:
Beach Lover
Former independent counsel Ken Starr, whose criminal investigation of former Democrat President Bill Clinton ended with Clinton’s impeachment, told Fox News on Wednesday after watching Democrats’ impeachment inquiry hearing that there was “no hope for impeachment” and that “no crime was proven today
SoWal Insider
"I think the argument that asking for a favor and in return for doing a legal obligation releasing the funds is pretty clearly a violation of a criminal bribery laws," he reiterated. "Republicans may not want to acknowledge that, which is why they'd rather undermine the witnesses than address the merits."Andrew Napolitano who wasn’t forced to resign from his tenured professor position at Baylor Law School for aiding in the coverup of sexual assaults.
Beach Fanatic
Number one, this is not a criminal proceeding and number two, we have laws that protect the identity of whistleblowers for the very reason you want so badly to learn who he is.
ERIC CIAMARELLA = "WHISTLEBLOWER".
Beach Lover
ERIC CIAMARELLA = "WHISTLEBLOWER".Accidentally Released by Schiff
Beach Fanatic
If this is to suggest you believe it was a good day for trump then I and millions of like minded Americans wish you many more just as good.
Of course it is not about Trump (your obesssion). You know what it is a symbol of: this will blow up the Democrats faces. And as I posted way back "remember, you all wanted this"...
Beach Lover
If you want to hear from first hand accounts ask your prez to order them to testify instead of ignoring subpoenas. Let the country witness how many will fall on their swords for this lying prick.Or let both sides call witnesses without restrictions
Beach Fanatic
I don’t give a sht if he knows or not or if he is lying. It’s comical you trumpers are suddenly concerned about honesty. Again, get back to us when you hold prez shtbag to the same standard. You are just deflecting because you know he is guilty of attempted extortion of an ally. I know trump told you not to believe what you are seeing and hearing, but the proof is right there in front of you so be honest and accept what is true.,
Edit: since it’s just hearsay why are you so desperate to hear he/she say it?
Again, for the folks in back. I did not vote for Trump; I did not vote for "her". I think Trump has been major disrupter to the UN/Agenda 2030/CFR/Tri-Lateral Commission plans to assimilate our great country into a North American superstate, and allow US citizens to be taxed by all of this climate change nonsense. As well as all the evil that would come with it. So what Trump is doing to thwart that is good. Don't you agree?
What's more important is to embarass, demoralize, discourage, enrage you on the left. You destroy every city and state you touch: California, Colorado. Austin, Denver, San Francisco, LA, Chicago, Memphis. Name one Conservative/Republican controlled state or city that is in the disrepair or utter breakdown like the ones I mentioned. Come on.....name one.
Beach Fanatic
After seeing enough of the first day, is it too early to post what's going to happen to the Dems with all of this? If too early, I can just bump it in the coming days?
14 November: I am going to go ahead and bump this. I will be gone all day and wont be back to computer until tonight. But we know what will happen again today. Honestly, I hope Schiff drags this out for weeks. Every day this goes on, you all lose credibility with the Susie Soccer Moms. Have a good day!!
Beach Lover
SoWal Insider
Or let both sides call witnesses without restrictionsYou be able to call all the witnesses you want when it is presented to the Senate for trial. You guys are really impatient. The House is being thorough. They have subpoenaed a number of material witnesses who have been ordered by the president not to testify, so who do you think is doing the obstruction of justice?
SoWal Insider
,No one said you did, just you support the prick.
Again, for the folks in back. I did not vote for Trump; I did not vote for "her". I think Trump has been major disrupter to the UN/Agenda 2030/CFR/Tri-Lateral Commission plans to assimilate our great country into a North American superstate, and allow US citizens to be taxed by all of this climate change nonsense. As well as all the evil that would come with it. So what Trump is doing to thwart that is good. Don't you agree?
What's more important is to embarass, demoralize, discourage, enrage you on the left. You destroy every city and state you touch: California, Colorado. Austin, Denver, San Francisco, LA, Chicago, Memphis. Name one Conservative/Republican controlled state or city that is in the disrepair or utter breakdown like the ones I mentioned. Come on.....name one.
Which states depend the most on money from the govt?
Thread locked
This conversation is read-only until a moderator unlocks it.