Welcome to America

When was Trump convicted of Rape?

When did you stop beating your wife?

I disagreed with Schiff yesterday allowing reading into the record statements from subpoenaed witnesses who refuse to appear. Fck um, got something to say? put on your big kid pants and show up and say it under oath like Sondland did.

Should the hoaxblower put his big boy pants on?

Should the hoaxblower put his big boy pants on?

Is the whistleblower relevant since every one of his allegations have been verified by witnesses under oath?

Should the hoaxblower put his big boy pants on?

So he/she can be physically threatened? He/she followed the rules and reported what they believed to be inappropriate and you all whine this person has no first hand knowledge so what is there to be gained besides personal attacks by Forever Trumpers on the dais? Why are you so fixated on the whistleblower and why won’t those who claim trump did nothing wrong come forward?

Is the whistleblower relevant since every one of his allegations have been verified by witnesses under oath?

Yes the hoaxblower is relevant, and no everything has not been verified. You must be on Russian fake news sites?

So he/she can be physically threatened? He followed the rules and reported what he believed to be inappropriate. Why are you so fixated on the whistleblower?

Not according to the justice department.

Did any of ya'll catch the debates last night?

The Dem's really need this impeachment thing to pan out....

Not according to the justice department.

Please expand.

Cadet Bone Spurs is now dictating internal military command policy and decisions. Another brick in the wall of fascism.

Please expand.

The Justice Department memo, which remains in effect, found that to qualify as an urgent concern, any whistle-blower complaint made to the intelligence agencies’ inspector general had to be about the funding, administration or operation of an intelligence agency. The memo found that the interference alleged by the whistle-blower did not meet that standard.

Yes the hoaxblower is relevant, and no everything has not been verified. You must be on Russian fake news sites?

Yes, point by point, everything on the whistleblower's complaint has been verified by sworn testimony. NPR and the NY Times, among others. It's just reality. Get use to it.

The Justice Department memo, which remains in effect, found that to qualify as an urgent concern, any whistle-blower complaint made to the intelligence agencies’ inspector general had to be about the funding, administration or operation of an intelligence agency. The memo found that the interference alleged by the whistle-blower did not meet that standard.

No, you must provide a link. In fact didn’t inspectors general across the federal government sign a letter disagreeing with the Justice Department's legal opinion that the original complaint by a CIA whistleblower about the call did not have to be turned over to Congress? Didn’t the IG find the complaint credible?

Aren’t all you Forever Trumpers really just pissed off at the whistleblower because you are now being forced to confront what a self serving POS your hero actually is?

No, you must provide a link. In fact didn’t inspectors general across the federal government sign a letter disagreeing with the Justice Department's legal opinion that the original complaint by a CIA whistleblower about the call did not have to be turned over to Congress? Didn’t the IG find the complaint credible?

I must provide a link, put your big boy pants on and find it yourself. Yes, the IGs did disagree with the Justice department but the Justice department memo is still in effect.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...54eb1a-0bc2-11ea-97ac-a7ccc8dd1ebc_story.html

I must provide a link, put your big boy pants on and find it yourself. Yes, the IGs did disagree with the Justice department but the Justice department memo is still in effect.

I will take it as you have none and it’s just common courtesy.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...54eb1a-0bc2-11ea-97ac-a7ccc8dd1ebc_story.html

Can’t view I have no subscription.

Can’t view I have no subscription.

Found it on USA Today

The FBI has contacted one of the whistleblower's attorneys at least twice to follow up on the whistleblower's complaint, which was referred to the Justice Department, this person said. The FBI has not talked to the whistleblower, and the request for an interview does not indicate the whistleblower is under investigation, this person added.

And here is the link. See how easy it is
Whistleblower: FBI has sought interview amid impeachment inquiry

I must provide a link, put your big boy pants on and find it yourself. Yes, the IGs did disagree with the Justice department but the Justice department memo is still in effect.

Please remind all of us who is the head of the DOJ.

Fiona Hill

Nunes didn’t do trump a favor by passing out copies of the report republicans refuse to believe much less read. This just gave the Dems a powerful tool to refute the denials and Ukrainian conspiracy theories.

My wife and I watch tv in chairs six feet apart and I frequently hear the person on the other line and even in a loud voice join in occasionally.

Conway began the questioning by bringing up Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. Adam Schiff's calls for respect towards witnesses. He then contrasted the guidance from Schiff, D-Calif., against Democrat-led calls to boycott Sondland's hotels in Oregon.

"The chairman also announces at every hearing that he will not tolerate, and I agree with him, any witness intimidation or any threats or any issues of trying to bully a witness," Conway said. "Congressman Earl Blumenauer, Democrat, from Oregon has in fact called for a boycott of your hotel chain or your hotels in Oregon. I'm assuming he believes that will harm you to the point that you will then be bullied into doing whatever he wants done."

Sondland agreed with Conway's statement before also confirming the congressman's assertion that Blumenauer's comments "gave rise to demonstrations at your hotels that made customers have to weave in and out of the demonstrators to try to actually get into the hotels."

"As I understand they are going on as we speak," Sondland responded.

Last week, it was Democrats sounding the alarm over alleged witness intimidation when President Trump live-tweeted ridicule of former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch as she was testifying on Friday.

Aren’t all you Forever Trumpers really just pissed off at the whistleblower because you are now being forced to confront what a self serving POS your hero actually is?

I guess they want to collectively break his legs or feed him to the fishes. I'm having a difficult time figuring out what questions they would ask him. And do they really hate Ukraine that much more than Russia? Their logic seems to end at "but what about the emails?"