Welcome to America

Tell us Fedx what line would trump have to cross for you to say it was a line too far? Apparently none it seems.

Rare Photo Emerges of Trump Without Lev Parnas. - Andy Borowitz

The most charitable view of the situation is that [Schiff’s] staff committed the equivalent of Congressional malpractice by not looking more than an inch deep to determine the facts before foisting this erroneous information on his colleagues and the American public. “But given the selective redactions and contextual clues, it seems as though Chairman Schiff sought to portray an innocuous meeting with Ukrainian oligarch Mykola Zlochevsky as an insidious one with the President of Ukraine simply because both of their surnames start with the letter Z.”

BREAKING: New Documents Show Democrat Adam Schiff Mischaracterized Evidence In Impeachment, Report Suggests

Why mischaracterize Evidence if your case is ironclad?

The most charitable view of the situation is that [Schiff’s] staff committed the equivalent of Congressional malpractice by not looking more than an inch deep to determine the facts before foisting this erroneous information on his colleagues and the American public. “But given the selective redactions and contextual clues, it seems as though Chairman Schiff sought to portray an innocuous meeting with Ukrainian oligarch Mykola Zlochevsky as an insidious one with the President of Ukraine simply because both of their surnames start with the letter Z.”

BREAKING: New Documents Show Democrat Adam Schiff Mischaracterized Evidence In Impeachment, Report Suggests

Why mischaracterize Evidence if your case is ironclad?

Well, this could be all cleared up if the White House released the full transcript, all other relevant documents, and allowed testimony from key participants in the case. Why prohibit evidence that will exonerate the president*?

trump in Davis referring to the impeachment evidence stated to reporters,
“We have all the material they don’t have the material.”
This is another “No sht Sherlock” moment.

Jake Tapper

✔@jaketapper
Great idea. There was a respected Washington Post columnist who i would love to have investigate the matter but you killed him https://twitter.com/saudiembassyusa/status/1219792870389035008 …

Saudi Embassy

✔@SaudiEmbassyUSA

Recent media reports that suggest the Kingdom is behind a hacking of Mr. Jeff Bezos' phone are absurd. We call for an investigation on these claims

Dumbass Stupid president* claims the wheel was invented in America and is protected intellectual property.

Well, this could be all cleared up if the White House released the full transcript, all other relevant documents, and allowed testimony from key participants in the case. Why prohibit evidence that will exonerate the president*?

House Democrats had ample opportunity to seek testimony from the witnesses they are now requesting, but they decided instead to rush through their unsubstantiated articles of impeachment. The Democrats are entangled in an intellectually dishonest effort to force a constitutional challenge against executive privilege in the name of taking down President Trump at all costs. We don’t need more testimony – we need less abuse of the Constitution, less mania and zero impeachment do overs.

If the dog shts in the house and you cover it with a rug you do know it's still there, right? Won't take long before the whole place smells like sht so even the sweepers won't be able to deny the smelly mess they've made. Problem is, when your place smells like sht becuuse it is sht your friends become scarce, your defenders missing, and your enemies (the real ones in Russia, Syria, Turkey, Iran and others) prepare to pounce. May God bless the United States of America and guide the clean up crew. The biggest shame, all this just because some cretin / ninny from Vapid Flats fooled some Americans into believing he is just like them, he with the platinum spoon. If you think the Whiner-in-Chief is like you, than you also need psychiatric hospitalization.

House Democrats had ample opportunity to seek testimony from the witnesses they are now requesting, but they decided instead to rush through their unsubstantiated articles of impeachment. The Democrats are entangled in an intellectually dishonest effort to force a constitutional challenge against executive privilege in the name of taking down President Trump at all costs. We don’t need more testimony – we need less abuse of the Constitution, less mania and zero impeachment do overs.

Do you or don’t you believe the president withheld military aid to Ukraine to coerce the president of Ukraine to announce that he would launch an investigation of Joe Biden? Do you or don’t you believe the president has refused to release documents and witnesses pertaining to this case?

House Democrats had ample opportunity to seek testimony from the witnesses they are now requesting, but they decided instead to rush through their unsubstantiated articles of impeachment. The Democrats are entangled in an intellectually dishonest effort to force a constitutional challenge against executive privilege in the name of taking down President Trump at all costs. We don’t need more testimony – we need less abuse of the Constitution, less mania and zero impeachment do overs.

What are you afraid of?

Do you or don’t you believe the president withheld military aid to Ukraine to coerce the president of Ukraine to announce that he would launch an investigation of Joe Biden? Do you or don’t you believe the president has refused to release documents and witnesses pertaining to this case?

You know these trumpistas are most comfortable wrapped in the blanket of their chosen one’s lies. The most dangerous thing in their world is truth that’s why Senate Republicans are sticking their heads up each others asses to muffle the slightest sound of witnesses with factual information. Ongoing discovery is a foreign language to them.

I guess it’s now ok now to lie to the Senate.
Fact check: Trump lawyers make at least three false claims during impeachment arguments - CNNPolitics

Do you or don’t you believe the president withheld military aid to Ukraine to coerce the president of Ukraine to announce that he would launch an investigation of Joe Biden? Do you or don’t you believe the president has refused to release documents and witnesses pertaining to this case?

Q1 No
Q2 The house has an obligation to go to the courts to settle the dispute on docs and witnesses.

Who the hell cares about the budget? We're going to have a country.

trump at a Friday fundraiser at his Mar-a-Lago estate.

Q1 No
Q2 The house has an obligation to go to the courts to settle the dispute on docs and witnesses.

The GAO said he withheld the payment. The OBM said he withheld the payment. The DOD said he withheld the payment. His own ambassadors said there was a quid pro quo between the payments and the announcement of an investigation into Biden. Provide any witnesses or documents that dispute these facts.

Q1 No
Q2 The house has an obligation to go to the courts to settle the dispute on docs and witnesses.

The White House has an obligation to assist the House of Representatives in its quest for the relevant witnesses and documents in an investigation.
Not this lying grifting mofo

Do you or don’t you believe the president withheld military aid to Ukraine to coerce the president of Ukraine to announce that he would launch an investigation of Joe Biden? Do you or don’t you believe the president has refused to release documents and witnesses pertaining to this case?

Do you believe Obummer should of been impeached for obstruction when he refused to hand over documents and refused to allow holder to testify in their gun running to Mexico aka fast and furious instead of the house taking them to court?

Do you believe Obummer should of been impeached for obstruction when he refused to hand over documents and refused to allow holder to testify in their gun running to Mexico aka fast and furious instead of the house taking them to court?

Deflection seems to be your only response. Sad. Your president and your senators are covering up the extortion of a foreign government to interfere in our elections and your stuck in Obamaville.

The GAO said he withheld the payment. The OBM said he withheld the payment. The DOD said he withheld the payment. His own ambassadors said there was a quid pro quo between the payments and the announcement of an investigation into Biden. Provide any witnesses or documents that dispute these facts.

name one person that testified under oath that Trump told them he was withholding the aid until Biden was investigated. Please provide a link.

The most charitable view of the situation is that [Schiff’s] staff committed the equivalent of Congressional malpractice by not looking more than an inch deep to determine the facts before foisting this erroneous information on his colleagues and the American public. “But given the selective redactions and contextual clues, it seems as though Chairman Schiff sought to portray an innocuous meeting with Ukrainian oligarch Mykola Zlochevsky as an insidious one with the President of Ukraine simply because both of their surnames start with the letter Z.”

BREAKING: New Documents Show Democrat Adam Schiff Mischaracterized Evidence In Impeachment, Report Suggests

Why mischaracterize Evidence if your case is ironclad?

Because Republicans and Trump supporters are really dense. You have to give it a little extra effort in order to get through to them. Kudos to Schiff for doing just that!

Salenski said to Trump in the partial transcript that he would get to work on the investigation. Why would he say that unless he was under pressure to do it. Why would he be under pressure? Because the president had been withholding the aid for about two months. You need to pay attention. Ambassador Somlin also said there was a quid pro quo. I’m not going to feed you the links. It’s a completely done deal that he did the crime. The question is are all you sycophants going to just say committing crimes is ok.

name one person that testified under oath that Trump told them he was withholding the aid until Biden was investigated. Please provide a link.

They might as well have Trump on camera saying those things. It wouldn't be any more damning.

name one person that testified under oath that Trump told them he was withholding the aid until Biden was investigated. Please provide a link.

Name one person close to him who has been under oath.
Mick Mulvaney could come testify that trump made very clear the money was not tied to investigating Biden.
Oh wait, the contradicts the perfect phone call.

Why hasn’t trump released the transcripts of any of the numerous additional calls where he asked Ukraine to investigate other types of corruption he claims he was so worried about?