Back to SoWal Lounge

Welcome to America

Leader of the Banned avatar
Beach FanaticLocked
620,146 views

Replies

15,441
PoppaJ avatar
SoWal Insider
#6102
Just reading where the tools at Fox State TV are really upset with Bolton for forcing them to confront his crimes from a firsthand witness account. :lol:
PoppaJ avatar
SoWal Insider
#6113
When you compare that to what Trump has done with Trump University, with so many other things, I think there's no comparison between who has engaged in more corruption and who is more likely to continue that if elected President of the United States,
Alan Dershowitz 2016
Lake View Too avatar
SoWal Insider
#6114
Alan Dershowitz 2016
Where is the context of this quote? What is he comparing Trump to?
Bob Wells avatar
Beach Fanatic
#6117
Great investment! Just one part of comprehensive border reform.
The Cost of a Border Wall vs. the Cost of Illegal Immigration
I am having issues with some of the Legislation in the Florida Legislature. First E-Verify, thought this would be a no brainers as it is suppose to make sure you are legally able to work in The United States. But opposition says it will be a burden to employers. Sounds like they are trying to protect cheap labor for employers and give them an out when their businesses are raided.

From Floridapolitics.com

The Republican Party of Florida Executive Committee passed a formal resolution urging passage of E-Verify requirements. The position stands in contrast to that of many members of the Legislature. Most notably, Galvano and Oliva both say this could place too much burden on employers. That falls in line with complaints from agriculture, hospitality and construction business leaders. But DeSantis has made the language a priority for the ongoing Legislative Session. RPOF Chair Gruters said it’s important for the party to rally around DeSantis on the issue.
Leader of the Banned avatar
Beach FanaticAuthor
#6118
I know this kind of news gives you a hard-on, but it has nothing to do with the trial for the removal of Don Trump, the most corrupt president in US history.
He's rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.
PoppaJ avatar
SoWal Insider
#6119
trump knows more about corruption than anyone.
Bob Wells avatar
Beach Fanatic
#6123
I would be willing to bet that the whistleblower would have no problem coming forward to corroborate the indelible truth at this point.
Senator Graham should be wary of what he wishes for. Please call witnesses! Call everyone he has named and a few more. Yes the President will invoked Executive Privilege and yes the Democrats will howl. But the process will drag on as the courts will get involved.
FdxUsmc avatar
Beach Fanatic
#6124
Senator Graham should be wary of what he wishes for. Please call witnesses! Call everyone he has named and a few more. Yes the President will invoked Executive Privilege and yes the Democrats will howl. But the process will drag on as the courts will get involved.
Why should the senate go the court route when the house refused too?

It seems to me that no good case has been made for witnesses,” Schumer said during a press conference on Jan. 27, 1999.

Days later, he argued that there was no reason to call witnesses, saying: “I wonder if the House managers aren’t a little more interested in political theater than in actually getting to the bottom of the facts.”
Schumer Demands Witnesses At Senate Trial. Here’s What He Said During Clinton’s Impeachment.
Lake View Too avatar
SoWal Insider
#6125
Why should the senate go the court route when the house refused too?

It seems to me that no good case has been made for witnesses,” Schumer said during a press conference on Jan. 27, 1999.

Days later, he argued that there was no reason to call witnesses, saying: “I wonder if the House managers aren’t a little more interested in political theater than in actually getting to the bottom of the facts.”
Schumer Demands Witnesses At Senate Trial. Here’s What He Said During Clinton’s Impeachment.
It was mentioned in the proceeding today that the court fight pertaining to the Don McGagn subpoena has lasted nine months so far with no decision in sight. Do you think the House would have been making the right decision if the impeachment stretched into the election. Then what?
FdxUsmc avatar
Beach Fanatic
#6126
It was mentioned in the proceeding today that the court fight pertaining to the Don McGagn subpoena has lasted nine months so far with no decision in sight. Do you think the House would have been making the right decision if the impeachment stretched into the election. Then what?
The senate court fight will take longer, since it started what five months after the house started.

Thread locked

This conversation is read-only until a moderator unlocks it.