Welcome to America

You believe he was guilty and because he was found not guilty you believe there should have been some sort of vigilante justice? Did you believe he was guilty before he went to trial?

Bob OJ is black and Trump is white. You're asking him to compare OJ to oranges.

Alright lets do it, deniers of what? Evidence of what? what facts?
Some times the best thing to do is nothing
Just let the left put on its dig and pony show, blow each other, and fizzle out
The left keeps trying to keep this alive because they have no accomplishments to stand behind
What do you want to go over about the most violent and deadliest insurrection is our nations capital where 1 lone protestor died and no one was charged with insurrection?

Because most of the poor dumbass yahoos were too stupid to fully realize what they were getting into. Many have been charged and pleaded guilty to seditious conspiracy which is easier to prove.
This stupid argument you have adopted from right wing talking points is like saying.
“Hey everyone good news, I don’t have syphilis I have gonorrhea!”

“If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.”

Is that what all trumpers are like? You should like the great uniter in office. Clowns know comical

The great uniter is intelligent enough to know not to waste time on the unreachable.

To your first comment, the president of the United States can declassify ANYTHING they want, they have the right to do this 100%. Can we agree on this LAW?

He also 100% has the right to take declassified info home to work on. Can we agree on this LAW?

I am simply stating the law because it is the law. I never said he declassified the info because it seems like they still don't know if he did. I do not know the process for declassifying info and the stuff I have read on it varies by source.

Never once did I say he 'owns' the documents because I do not think he owns the documents on any level.

You can repeat the stuff you make up all you want but I am on firm ground here, everything I said is law is in fact law, I will source it if you want

My thinking has not changed on this yet but if the law reads something I haven't seen yet I will change my stance but remember my stance for everyone in the country is that if they break the law the should be held to account, I do not see that stance changing

SO notice you keep bringing up the 'pre dawn raid' that I admitted to getting wrong. The footage I saw of cars with lights on were at dusk not dawn. I would like to admit again in all caps, for the record. I WAS WRONG ABOUT THE TIMEFRAME FOR THE RAID ON MAR LAGO. Please let me know if you need me to write it again, I will admit when I am wrong.

The raid was 100% a political stunt just as all the other stunts, this could have been handled 100's or 1000's of different ways yet they chose this way. Can you agree with this or was a men with guns raid the only way to do this?

To say I 'condone espionage' is coo coo talk

I like presidents who are smart enough to know what intelligence needs to be kept secret and realize it doesn’t belong to him.

To your first comment, the president of the United States can declassify ANYTHING they want, they have the right to do this 100%. Can we agree on this LAW?

He also 100% has the right to take declassified info home to work on. Can we agree on this LAW?

I am simply stating the law because it is the law. I never said he declassified the info because it seems like they still don't know if he did. I do not know the process for declassifying info and the stuff I have read on it varies by source.

Never once did I say he 'owns' the documents because I do not think he owns the documents on any level.

You can repeat the stuff you make up all you want but I am on firm ground here, everything I said is law is in fact law, I will source it if you want

My thinking has not changed on this yet but if the law reads something I haven't seen yet I will change my stance but remember my stance for everyone in the country is that if they break the law the should be held to account, I do not see that stance changing

SO notice you keep bringing up the 'pre dawn raid' that I admitted to getting wrong. The footage I saw of cars with lights on were at dusk not dawn. I would like to admit again in all caps, for the record. I WAS WRONG ABOUT THE TIMEFRAME FOR THE RAID ON MAR LAGO. Please let me know if you need me to write it again, I will admit when I am wrong.

The raid was 100% a political stunt just as all the other stunts, this could have been handled 100's or 1000's of different ways yet they chose this way. Can you agree with this or was a men with guns raid the only way to do this?

To say I 'condone espionage' is coo coo talk

No, we can't agree on the law that you claim says he can 100% take declassified documents to his home (i.e. Mara Lago) when he is no longer president of the United States. I have sent you the Statute. It's very easy to google. I feel like I'm trying to homeschool a third grader. He doesn't own the documents, ever. Not even when he is president*. He cannot remove the documents to another location, even if they are de-classified. If you keep throwing up this "voodoo declass" red herring, it sure does appear that you are wishing for him to get away with "theft and improper storage of sensitive government documents", without accountability. If you keep harping that this is a "political stunt" is sure does show a lack of respect for law enforcement. In general, your entire stance on this case points to an overwhelming feeling that you want mr. trump to somehow dodge getting held accountable for his actions. Perhaps, this stance of yours is politically motivated ( you might see the deflation of trump as a major deflation of the entire GQP). Regardless, in the realm of public opinion, which is where this message board is located, you look like you are condoning espionage.

No, we can't agree on the law that you claim says he can 100% take declassified documents to his home (i.e. Mara Lago) when he is no longer president of the United States. I have sent you the Statute. It's very easy to google. I feel like I'm trying to homeschool a third grader. He doesn't own the documents, ever. Not even when he is president*. He cannot remove the documents to another location, even if they are de-classified. If you keep throwing up this "voodoo declass" red herring, it sure does appear that you are wishing for him to get away with "theft and improper storage of sensitive government documents", without accountability. If you keep harping that this is a "political stunt" is sure does show a lack of respect for law enforcement. In general, your entire stance on this case points to an overwhelming feeling that you want mr. trump to somehow dodge getting held accountable for his actions. Perhaps, this stance of yours is politically motivated ( you might see the deflation of trump as a major deflation of the entire GQP). Regardless, in the realm of public opinion, which is where this message board is located, you look like you are condoning espionage.

You are dealing with willful stupidity.
Im pretty sure I posted a timeline of events leading up to the FBI retrieving the documents that clearly demonstrated trump and his attorneys lied when they claimed they conducted an exhaustive search and there were no more documents to be found.

You are dealing with willful stupidity.
Im pretty sure I posted a timeline of events leading up to the FBI retrieving the documents that clearly demonstrated trump and his attorneys lied when they claimed they conducted an exhaustive search and there were no more documents to be found.

I know espionage is such a loaded word. (James Bond, micro-cameras, Russian bad guys...but that was the sixties.) I seriously doubt the FBI would have used that term in it's Search Affidavit unless it had the probable cause, which the judge agreed with. But, if you are trying to throw up a basket of red herring, everyday, it sure looks fishy and it stinks. Is it "condoning espionage"? In my opinion, yes.

Ok Mr. Apologist on how many loan applications have you lied?

That’s like saying, “I never raped a woman who didn’t want it.”

No thats not like saying that at all, try harder
The last time you got an appraisal on anything did it seem lower then what you thought the value was?
I dare you to be honest

You believe he was guilty and because he was found not guilty you believe there should have been some sort of vigilante justice? Did you believe he was guilty before he went to trial?

I'm simply saying if he had killed my daughter society wouldn't have to worry about him anymore. I thought he seemed guilty then once I read the detectives interviews after the trial I knew he was guilty

I am not a turn the other cheek kinda guy at all, are you?

I noticed you didn't answer my question. Do you Think OJ is guilty of murder?

Bob OJ is black and Trump is white. You're asking him to compare OJ to oranges.

Bravo young man bravo, very witty, I like it. No red X

Because most of the poor dumbass yahoos were too stupid to fully realize what they were getting into. Many have been charged and pleaded guilty to seditious conspiracy which is easier to prove.
This stupid argument you have adopted from right wing talking points is like saying.
“Hey everyone good news, I don’t have syphilis I have gonorrhea!”

https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-1999-title18-section2384&num=0&edition=1999

“If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.”

Not one charge of insurrection? Not one?
You're analogy is dumb as usual, try harder

Read the Declaration of Independence you may find what you seek

The great uniter is intelligent enough to know not to waste time on the unreachable.

Hes as good at running the country as he is at raising kids

I like presidents who are smart enough to know what intelligence needs to be kept secret and realize it doesn’t belong to him.

Well you're in luck because biden doesn't know anything and can barely read

No, we can't agree on the law that you claim says he can 100% take declassified documents to his home (i.e. Mara Lago) when he is no longer president of the United States. I have sent you the Statute. It's very easy to google. I feel like I'm trying to homeschool a third grader. He doesn't own the documents, ever. Not even when he is president*. He cannot remove the documents to another location, even if they are de-classified. If you keep throwing up this "voodoo declass" red herring, it sure does appear that you are wishing for him to get away with "theft and improper storage of sensitive government documents", without accountability. If you keep harping that this is a "political stunt" is sure does show a lack of respect for law enforcement. In general, your entire stance on this case points to an overwhelming feeling that you want mr. trump to somehow dodge getting held accountable for his actions. Perhaps, this stance of yours is politically motivated ( you might see the deflation of trump as a major deflation of the entire GQP). Regardless, in the realm of public opinion, which is where this message board is located, you look like you are condoning espionage.

Not sure if you are not reading what I am writing or if you're being dishonest. I never said he had the right to take anything after biden took over.

I agree 100% he doesn't own the documents

I have never stated anything to do with the process of declassifying documents because I don't know the process

I have clearly stated that anyone that breaks the law should be held to account

The raid of Mar Lago was 100% a political stunt, politics and law enforcement are completely different subjects

I don't have a stance except I want the facts presented and the laws upheld. You want him convicted out of emotion and feelings before the work is actually done

I have clearly stated that Trump is not a guy I would hang out with but my views align more with him the with the guy before or after him. I am not emotionally tied like a lot of people around here. I can like the message and not like the messenger.

Your last line is still silly talk but that doesn't seem to stop you from constantly repeating it

You are dealing with willful stupidity.
Im pretty sure I posted a timeline of events leading up to the FBI retrieving the documents that clearly demonstrated trump and his attorneys lied when they claimed they conducted an exhaustive search and there were no more documents to be found.

Well right now I'm dealing with you so we agree, MR willful stupidity

Insert post below showing where he said exactly what he claims to have not said in multiple instances.

This show is getting really predictable.

I'm simply saying if he had killed my daughter society wouldn't have to worry about him anymore. I thought he seemed guilty then once I read the detectives interviews after the trial I knew he was guilty

I am not a turn the other cheek kinda guy at all, are you?

I noticed you didn't answer my question. Do you Think OJ is guilty of murder?

In fairness 12 jurors said he wasn't. My opinion, it is possible he was guilty. Only after he was found not guilty you knew he was guilty based on Detective notes. Thank you

Well right now I'm dealing with you so we agree, MR willful stupidity

Back to I’m rubber you’re glue?

Hes as good at running the country as he is at raising kids

Did a better job than trump with his military dodging gang of grifters.

No thats not like saying that at all, try harder
The last time you got an appraisal on anything did it seem lower then what you thought the value was?
I dare you to be honest

You have no idea the pleasure we get witnessing you tie yourself in knots concocting excuses to defend anything trump does.
Please don’t stop.

Lou is starting to smell like the Ted Cruz of this message board.

Not sure if you are not reading what I am writing or if you're being dishonest. I never said he had the right to take anything after biden took over.

I agree 100% he doesn't own the documents

I have never stated anything to do with the process of declassifying documents because I don't know the process

I have clearly stated that anyone that breaks the law should be held to account

The raid of Mar Lago was 100% a political stunt, politics and law enforcement are completely different subjects

I don't have a stance except I want the facts presented and the laws upheld. You want him convicted out of emotion and feelings before the work is actually done

I have clearly stated that Trump is not a guy I would hang out with but my views align more with him the with the guy before or after him. I am not emotionally tied like a lot of people around here. I can like the message and not like the messenger.

Your last line is still silly talk but that doesn't seem to stop you from constantly repeating it

I just quoted your quote from earlier where you stated if he declassified the docs he could take them home. You said it. So, now you are calling yourself a liar. This is not going to be that productive if you keep denying statements you made previously. Next, you said the warranted search was a political stunt, but yet the warranted search was done by law reinforcement. I can only reach one conclusion: you just stated law enforcement pulled a political stunt. Own up to your own words. Every time you call a legal warranted search a political stunt it reeks of political fear. When the Trump balloon deflates, the entire GQP collapses. Keep propping up your sad little red herrings. “Voodoo de-class” “political stunt”, “trump does homework”. This is fun. You are doing great, Ted.

I just quoted your quote from earlier where you stated if he declassified the docs he could take them home. You said it. So, now you are calling yourself a liar. This is not going to be that productive if you keep denying statements you made previously. Next, you said the warranted search was a political stunt, but yet the warranted search was done by law reinforcement. I can only reach one conclusion: you just stated law enforcement pulled a political stunt. Own up to your own words. Every time you call a legal warranted search a political stunt it reeks of political fear. When the Trump balloon deflates, the entire GQP collapses. Keep propping up your sad little red herrings. “Voodoo de-class” “political stunt”, “trump does homework”. This is fun. You are doing great, Ted.

If trump does it it’s ok but it’s 100% political if you question it.
See how it works?
A simple formula for simple minds.

In fairness 12 jurors said he wasn't. My opinion, it is possible he was guilty. Only after he was found not guilty you knew he was guilty based on Detective notes. Thank you

Seems about right, I didn't know, he was found innocent, read what the detectives said couldn't be used in trial, now I believe he is guilty. You are welcom