Welcome to America

Lou will be pissed you’re off topic but the FBI said when Swalwell was briefed on concerns about Fang in 2015, he immediately cut off contact and cooperated with the bureau’s probe.

An FBI official has previously defended Swalwell, telling outlets in December that Swalwell was “completely cooperative” and “under no suspicion of wrongdoing,”

Now do trump’s traitor tot’s when meeting with Russians for dirt on Hillary.

Why is it you never have anything real?

It's not real that a sitting member of the intel committee was playing bang bang with fang fang?
How come when someone on the left does something its no big deal but when hillary hires a company to spread disinformation on Trump everybody loses their poop?

So the topic here was washed up athletes threatening elected officials with death threats. Let's stick to that shall we?

So the topic here was washed up athletes threatening elected officials with death threats. Let's stick to that shall we?

My bad, I'll do my best. Not sure if anyone that has been paid to play professionally can be considered 'washed up' but I don't want to stop critics from critiquing. Better to be a 'has been' then a 'never was' in my opinion

Lou will be pissed you’re off topic but the FBI said when Swalwell was briefed on concerns about Fang in 2015, he immediately cut off contact and cooperated with the bureau’s probe.

An FBI official has previously defended Swalwell, telling outlets in December that Swalwell was “completely cooperative” and “under no suspicion of wrongdoing,”

Now do trump’s traitor tot’s when meeting with Russians for dirt on Hillary.

Why is it you never have anything real?

Funny, the FBI never seems to defend democrats, uuuuuuuuuuunnnnnnnnnnnnllllllllllllleeeeeeeeeesssssssssssssssssssssss you mean all the time.
Please see the Durham report for numerous examples

It's not real that a sitting member of the intel committee was playing bang bang with fang fang?
How come when someone on the left does something its no big deal but when hillary hires a company to spread disinformation on Trump everybody loses their poop?

Please post what you have where Swalwell did anything wrong? He was informed and he cooperated unlike your hero who obstructed. trump even let a Chinese spy join Mar-a-Lardo.

Funny, the FBI never seems to defend democrats, uuuuuuuuuuunnnnnnnnnnnnllllllllllllleeeeeeeeeesssssssssssssssssssssss you mean all the time.
Please see the Durham report for numerous examples

The report that bigly and completely exonerated everyone like no one has ever seen?
I think you’re confusing it with the Mueller report where a total of thirty-four individuals and three companies were indicted by Mueller's investigators. Eight have pleaded guilty to or been convicted of felonies, including five Trump associates and campaign officials.

Please post what you have where Swalwell did anything wrong? He was informed and he cooperated unlike your hero who obstructed. trump even let a Chinese spy join Mar-a-Lardo.

When you say wrong do you mean other then sleeping with a chinese spy? Do you know what the mathematical chances of a chinese spy sleeping with an American representative would be? Your boy was getting played.

You may want to research the Trump thing before you try to compare the 2, I don't want you to come off uneducated

The report that bigly and completely exonerated everyone like no one has ever seen?
I think you’re confusing it with the Mueller report where a total of thirty-four individuals and three companies were indicted by Mueller's investigators. Eight have pleaded guilty to or been convicted of felonies, including five Trump associates and campaign officials.

and what did they plead guilty to?

The report that bigly and completely exonerated everyone like no one has ever seen?
I think you’re confusing it with the Mueller report where a total of thirty-four individuals and three companies were indicted by Mueller's investigators. Eight have pleaded guilty to or been convicted of felonies, including five Trump associates and campaign officials.

The report that bigly and completely exonerated everyone like no one has ever seen?
I think you’re confusing it with the Mueller report where a total of thirty-four individuals and three companies were indicted by Mueller's investigators. Eight have pleaded guilty to or been convicted of felonies, including five Trump associates and campaign officials.

Do you mean the mueller report where 40+ people that absolutely hated Trump worked for as long as they wanted with no budget to try to find anything on Trump and came up with nothing? That mueller report?
I forget what was Trump charged with at the end of that?
Maybe I missed it, help me out

Do you mean the mueller report where 40+ people that absolutely hated Trump worked for as long as they wanted with no budget to try to find anything on Trump and came up with nothing? That mueller report?
I forget what was Trump charged with at the end of that?
Maybe I missed it, help me ou

You do know these answers are out there don’t you?
Here is Mueller’s statement on why he wasn’t charged.

"Based on Justice Department policy and principles of fairness, we decided we would not make a determination as to whether the President committed a crime. That was our decision then and it remains our decision today."

The Justice Department and The Office of Legal Counsel have a long-standing policy that prevents federal prosecutors from charging the president with a crime.

Here’s another Mueller quote.

"As set forth in the report, after that investigation, if we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so.”

Also, Jerold Nadler asked Mueller directly whether Donald Trump had been accurate to claim he was "exonerated" by the special counsel report, to which Mr Muller replied with an emphatic "No".

When you say wrong do you mean other then sleeping with a chinese spy? Do you know what the mathematical chances of a chinese spy sleeping with an American representative would be? Your boy was getting played.

You may want to research the Trump thing before you try to compare the 2, I don't want you to come off uneducated

There's an assumption that they had sex something Swalwell denies.

Again, you think it's appropriate for someone to make death threats against a dually elected official?

You do know these answers are out there don’t you?
Here is Mueller’s statement on why he wasn’t charged.

"Based on Justice Department policy and principles of fairness, we decided we would not make a determination as to whether the President committed a crime. That was our decision then and it remains our decision today."

The Justice Department and The Office of Legal Counsel have a long-standing policy that prevents federal prosecutors from charging the president with a crime.

Also, Jerold Nadler asked Mueller directly whether Donald Trump had been accurate to claim he was "exonerated" by the special counsel report, to which Mr Muller replied with an emphatic "No".

The special counsel found that Russia did interfere with the election, but “did not find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in these efforts, despite multiple efforts from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign.”

As far as obstruction, the Mueller report laid out facts on both sides but did not reach a conclusion. Barr’s letter said that “the Special Counsel states that ‘while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.’”

This is leftist logic, so neither Trump not any of his people worked with the russians (even though the russians tried) but he may or may not have obstructed the investigation into whether he helped the russians, which mueller proved he didn't do. Clear as mud

There's an assumption that they had sex something Swalwell denies.

Again, you think it's appropriate for someone to make death threats against a dually elected official?

When did I say it was OK for anyone to make death threats against anyone?

and what did they plead guilty to?

Do your own research for your questions.

Do your own research for your questions.

Exactly

The special counsel found that Russia did interfere with the election, but “did not find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in these efforts, despite multiple efforts from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign.”

As far as obstruction, the Mueller report laid out facts on both sides but did not reach a conclusion. Barr’s letter said that “the Special Counsel states that ‘while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.’”

This is leftist logic, so neither Trump not any of his people worked with the russians (even though the russians tried) but he may or may not have obstructed the investigation into whether he helped the russians, which mueller proved he didn't do. Clear as mud

Mueller finds no collusion with Russia, leaves obstruction question open

Special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation did not find sufficient evidence that President Donald Trump’s campaign coordinated with Russia to influence the United States’ 2016 election and did not take a clear position on whether Trump obstructed justice.

www.americanbar.org

Barr’s letter? Are you kidding?
You keep leaving out the part where Russian was trying help trump win. Why is that?

Let’s get back to humor

Let’s get back to humor

View attachment 100310

Thought you were above calling people gay? I don't want to see you come off as a hypocrite

Thought you were above calling people gay? I don't want to see you come off as a hypocrite

Take your whining back to your self pity thread

Take your whining back to your self pity thread

Easy there Jamie you don't have the sand

Our Democracy is the only thing that stands between them telling us how to live and think and our personal quality of life!

Actually the 2nd amendment is democracy's teeth, thats why it so important

Actually the 2nd amendment is democracy's teeth, thats why it so important

When is the last time you had to chase a British soldier out of your home?

When is the last time you had to chase a British soldier out of your home?

The last time one came in

When is the last time you had to chase a British soldier out of your home?

Matt
You are clearly an educated man
You have read and understand history
You know every great society has a shelf life and every one of them has eventually fallen
How do they fall?

Answer if you would like or throw some snippy response if you don't want to answer