Maybe you know something I don't but these guys interviewed the applicants then voted to hire whom they felt was most qualified. I have never seen them give much information as to why they did not hire someone.
I would think that they would have some criteria to which measurements of qualifications and ability would be assessed against. One would (should) have specific reasons as to why one person is qualified and the other is not. I am asking if anyone knows what their decision was based off of. Was it made based on qualifications or was it made based on political favors (thus, enter the uncle situation).
The bottom line is this. I may not have my finger directly on the pulse of the politics up north, but from what I have heard and what I know, putting all of it together, all Mr. Adkinson is, is another good old boy, just a bit younger then the old stable. If elected sheriff he will be no better than any prior administration, he'll just have a different agenda.
The time has come for this county to look at where it is in 2008. We have untrained deputies patroling our communities, we have radio equipment that is substandard and causes a safety risk, we have an influx of illegal aliens (many of whom are criminals) and no plan to protect ourselves, we have a sheriff who fires pregnant women, mishandles public funds, promotes based on incompetetance (the more you screw up the more you get strips/bars), we have little if any cooperation between other surrounding agencies, we have drugs infesting the Sandestin area (Baytowne), we even shoot a whale here and there. The old system has got to go.
We need fresh new leadership, at least a few individuals have responded to the "request" to produce their qualifications and some have gone further and given a list of goals. This county needs to move forward, please help it. No Ralph Johnson, no Mike Adkinson, no good old boys.