I would also be considered opinionated by many.
I feel that I should not rush to a conclusion on a vote for a position that has the impact on the citizens of Walton County such as this race. I learned many years ago that making such a decision in a vacuum can be disasterous. I research and then try to elicit other view points to either confirm or deny my initial thought process.
Bill Imfield was a very qualified candidate. He would be "In the Pool", but our current Sheriff chose to involke a never before used law to remove him from the race. Bill was faced with a decision that was difficult, but one that he faced straight on and decided that his financial well being was key to his current situation. I have talked to him 2 times trying to get him to get back in the race when he could. He tells me that is not going to happen.
I am now moving own trying to find someone to replace Ralphie.
I have been looking for a dialogue to find a candidate. Been accused of many things, but I'm a tough old bird. I can stand the criticism -deserved or undeserved.
I am not impressed with "Campaign Bio's". They are mere marketing tools that are written to place that candidate in the best light possible.
I vet candidates. I seek not only how long they have served, but what their duties and responsibilities were, how they were perceived by the general public.
First and foremost I seek what they plan to do if chosen and even more specifically how they plan to accomplish it, what the associated cost would be, and a time table for implementation. When you look closely most of the current crop of candidates just want to be Sheriff - see that the field is really weak and diluted by many just seeking to win the "Election Jackpot".
I just simply throw them "Out of the Pool" when noone gives me reason to reconsider. It's really my list and thought that some others might be going through a similar "vetting" process.
I finish what I start.