Back to All About SoWal

Proposed Rental Ordinance Update?

wrobert avatar
wrobertBeach Fanatic
28,064 views
Short term rental ordinance

I heard about this a couple of days ago and finally got around to getting a copy. You guys are going to love this. The request to set up the first public workshop is October 26th. After reading I think you will agree a workshop on this ordinance is a waste of time, but your commissioners need to know your thoughts. This is just the initial DRAFT and no public comment has yet to have been taken.

ORDINANCE 2010-__ ​
AN ORDINANCE OF WALTON COUNTY,FLORIDA; ESTABLISHING REGULATIONS AND PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS FOR SHORT-TERM RENTALS OF SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS; PROVIDING FOR AUTHORITY, PURPOSE, DEFINITIONS; PROVIDING FOR REGISTRATION AND APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS; PROVIDING FOR PENALTIES, JUDICIAL CONSTRUCTION, SEVERABILITY, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Walton County, Florida (Board) is concerned with the potential harmful affects short-term rentals of single-family detached residential dwelling units have on the health, safety, and general welfare of the residents of Walton County; and

WHEREAS, there is an interest in protecting the quality of life of the residents and value of property in Walton County; and

WHEREAS, the Board finds it is in the best interests of the health, safety, and welfare of the people of Walton County to establish reasonable regulations and permitting requirements for short-term rentals of single-family detached residential dwelling units.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Walton County, Florida that:

Section 1. Authority. Section 125.01, Florida Statutes, and the State Constitution authorize the enactment of this ordinance.

Section 2. Purpose. The Board recognizes that the unregulated short-term rental of single-family detached residential dwelling units by seasonal residents uniquely impacts certain neighborhoods within the unincorporated areas of Walton County. Therefore, it is necessary to provide reasonable means for citizens of Walton County to mitigate impacts created by such rentals as set forth in this ordinance.

Section 3. Definitions. For the purpose of this Ordinance, certain words and phrases used herein are defined as follows:
Owner shall mean the person in whom is vested the ownership, dominion, or title of property.

Responsible party shall mean the property owner or his/her designee to be called upon to answer for the maintenance of the property and the conduct and acts of seasonal residents of the subject property.

Seasonal resident shall mean guests, tourists, lessees, vacationers, or others who lease or rent a residential property for valuable consideration for a period of time between one (1) day to no more than six (6) months.

Short-term rental shall mean any occupancy of single-family detached residential dwelling units for a period of time between one (1) day to no more than six (6) months.

Section 4. Registration required. It shall be unlawful for any person to allow another person to occupy any single-family detached residential dwelling unit as a seasonal resident within the County, or offer such rental services within the County, unless the person has been registered with the County in accordance with the provisions of this ordinance.

Section 5. Application required. Every person required to procure a registration under the provisions of this ordinance shall submit a form application for such registration to the County. Applications for registration shall set forth and/or include at a minimum:


  • Physical address, including lot, block, and subdivision name, of the single-family detached residential dwelling unit offered for rental.
  • Name, address, and phone number of owner of the single-family detached residential dwelling unit.
  • Name, address, and 24-hour emergency contact phone number of responsible party for the single-family detached residential dwelling unit.
  • The phone number for the responsible party shall be answered 24 hours a day, 7 days a week by a party with the authority to address or coordinate problems associated with the single-family detached residential dwelling unit.
  • Acknowledgements by owner of the following:
a. That all vehicles must be parked in the driveway of the single-family detached residential dwelling unit and clear of all county right-of-way.
b. That it shall be unlawful to allow or make any noise or sound which exceed the limits set forth in _____________.
c. That a sign will be posted and maintained on the single-family detached residential dwelling unit in accordance with _______________.
d. That other properties (not owned by the owner) are not jointly shared commodities and should not be considered available for public use.

  • Proof of owners current ownership of single-family detached residential dwelling unit.

Section 6. Registration are non-transferable. No registration issued under this ordinance shall be transferred or assigned or used by any person other than the one to whom it is issued, or at any location other than the one for which it is issued.

Section 7. Expiration of registration. All registrations issued under this ordinance shall be valid for no more than one (1) year, and all registrations shall expire on March 1 of each year.

Section 8. Responsible party required. The owner shall appoint a person to serve as the local responsible party for service of notices as are specified herein, and notices given to the responsible party shall be sufficient to satisfy any requirement of notice to the owner. The owner shall notify the County Administrator or his designee in writing of the appointment within five (5) days of being required to make such appointment, and shall thereafter notify the County Administrator or his designee of any change of responsible party within fifteen (15) days of such change. Further, it is hereby made the affirmative duty of the responsible party to:

1. Inform all seasonal residents prior to occupancy of applicable Walton County codes and ordinances concerning noise, parking, garbage, and common area usage;
2. See that the provisions of this ordinance are complied with and promptly address any violations of this ordinance or any violations of law, which may come to the attention of the responsible party;
3. Be available with authority to address or coordinate problems with the rental of the single-family detached dwelling unit twenty-four (24) hours a day, seven (7) days a week;
4. Be situated close enough to the single-family detached dwelling unit as to service emergency calls within one (1) hour of notification; and
5. Keep available a register of all guests, which shall be open to inspection by Walton County Code Enforcement Officers at all times.

Section 9. False information. It shall be a violation of this ordinance for any person to give any false or misleading information in connection with the application for registration required under this ordinance.

Section 10. Revocation. Any registration issued pursuant to this ordinance may be denied, revoked, or suspended by the County for any violation of this ordinance, any other County ordinance, regulation, code, or state law. Such denial, revocation, or suspension is in addition to any penalty provided herein.

Section 11. Posting of sign. Prior to the owner allowing another person to occupy the single-family detached dwelling unit as a seasonal resident, owner shall post a sign on the property meeting the following requirements:


  • The sign must be prominently placed on the property so that the required content of the sign shall be legible as viewed from the public right-of-way;
  • Such sign shall not be larger than eighteen (18) inches by twelve (12) inches and not smaller than sixteen (16) inches by ten (10) inches in size;
  • The sign must clearly indicate the name, and twenty-four (24) hours a day, seven (7) days a week emergency contact phone number of the responsible party for the single-family detached dwelling unit. If the responsible party phone number and rental contact phone number are different, the sign shall clearly indicate both phone numbers;
  • The sign must be continuously on the property of the single-family detached dwelling unit during any period the registration has not expired; and
  • The sign must clearly indicate the expiration date of the registration.

Section 12. Penalty for Violation. In addition to any and all additional remedies available at law, any owner violating any provision of this ordinance may be directed to:
1. Cease and desist such violation;
2. Upon a finding of a violation of this ordinance, pay a civil penalty not less than $250.00 for first offense and $500 for repeat violations;
3. Every day a violation continues shall constitute a separate and distinct offense.

Section 13. Judicial Construction. NO provision of this ordinance shall be construed to impair any common law or statutory cause of action, or legal remedy there from.
Section 14. Severability. Should any word, phrase, sentence, or section of this ordinance be held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be illegal, void, unenforceable, or unconstitutional, then such shall be severed from this ordinance and the remainder of the ordinance shall remain in full force and effect.

Section 15. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect as provided by law.

Replies

134
Groovegirls avatar
GroovegirlsBeach Fanatic
#77
So, given that most short-term rental owners don't actually live in South Walton, what's the mechanism for having our interests considered in ordinances like this? This is not just about overcrowding at Wedding-designated rentals. I think this is a bad idea. I think it will negatively affect rental properties, property values, and tourism in the area in general. The bed taxes that my unit collects help to fund the County and services provided in South Walton. However, as a non-resident, I have no right to vote in Walton County. Does the County take into consideration opinions from the absentee rental owner community, and if so, what's the best mechanism for communicating opinions to whoever might vote in favor of this ordinance?


Send them an email or a letter. Also you can attend the meetings when you are in town.
WaltonIsOneBeach Lover
#78
So, given that most short-term rental owners don't actually live in South Walton, what's the mechanism for having our interests considered in ordinances like this? This is not just about overcrowding at Wedding-designated rentals. I think this is a bad idea. I think it will negatively affect rental properties, property values, and tourism in the area in general. The bed taxes that my unit collects help to fund the County and services provided in South Walton. However, as a non-resident, I have no right to vote in Walton County. Does the County take into consideration opinions from the absentee rental owner community, and if so, what's the best mechanism for communicating opinions to whoever might vote in favor of this ordinance?

Grovegirls makes a good point about sending letters and e-mails.

Sorry, this is a long post answer to your question.

It has been my experience that both county employees and the county commissioners (or a staff member) do take the time to read and act (if necessary) on issues communicated by both e-mails and letters. Also, when possible, a face to face meeting works well.

In this particular case, you might consider writing the Commissioner in your district a short letter. And copy this letter to both the county Planning Department Head and the Head of the TDC. One of the benefits of living and/or owning property in a county with a population of less than 60,000 people, like Walton County, is that these individuals are accessible.

I have found that the Commissioners and the county employees I have interacted with do listen to constructive input and also respond to requests for assistance when priorities and resources enable them to do so.

This is especially the case when these county government officials or employees are treated with the same sincere respect that each and every one of us deserves and expects of them when we are voicing our views and concerns to them. Of course, we all should share our passion and knowledge with these individuals so that they can take both under consideration.

Also, letters and e-mails are important to the process of the creation of legislation. These documents become "part of the record" that is accessible to all county employees, commissioners, and us tax payers under the State of Florida's "Sunshine Law".

Also, something worth thinking about, when you are "looking" to help government officials make the "right decision", it is helpful to request access to county records, documents, e-mails, etc. that pertain to the creation of legislation as sometimes it might help you identify what has been discussed in previous Board of County Commissioners meetings concerning a particular topic.

A good county web site to visit to get this information is: Walton County Board of County Commissioners Meeting Minutes Online or you can contact the Walton County Administrators office to get the 2011 meeting minutes that not available on this site yet that touch in this particular issue. Also you can visit

http://fl-waltoncounty.civicplus.com/DocumentView.aspx?DID=3126

to get a copy of the legislation that is up for discussion at the BCC meeting on March 22nd. (Note this was originally scheduled to come before the BCC on March 8th.)

I have also found that signing up for "Alerts" on the County Web site telling me about the upcoming meetings in the County government is helpful.

You often can see agendas prior to a meeting, so that you can send a letter to someone in the government "before" a meeting to discuss or vote on an issue takes place, versus trying to do something about legislation after it has already passed.

Ok, sorry for the long winded response, but in summary, there are many resources available on the County Website and from the County Administrator's office that can make it much easier to get involved in "ALL OF OUR" local government no matter if WE are "citizens". Walton County govt. employees, or "non-resident" property owners and county "taxpayers".

In either case, we ALL should offer our time to "guide" the County Commissioners and have a voice in matters that affect all of us.

Walton County Government needs and will accept our help.

Edited

WaltonIsOneBeach Lover
#79
Actually your bed taxes fund the TDC which provides some services such as trash collection along the beach. Your property taxes actually fund the local infrastructure, fire service, sheriff, etc.


Also, the Walton County Taxpayers Association (WCTA) is a great source of information on local issues.
wrobert avatar
wrobertBeach FanaticAuthor
#80
This may not be the best topic to get my feet wet in, but here goes:
The county has sufficent ordinances already on the books to deal with the problems if they are enforced. Every new ordinance has unintended consequences, so I would think the best path is to enforce those already on the books before we pass any new ones.


So true. And I believe that the commissioners are starting to realize that this is a bit over reaching to solve an issue that is being created by less than a half dozen property owners. Hopefully they will listen. I was in on a meeting the other day with a commissioner and someone from the local chamber and their were some really good solutions discussed to solve the problems. Now if they can figure out implementation.
Elephant Child avatar
Elephant ChildBeach Lover
#81
So true. And I believe that the commissioners are starting to realize that this is a bit over reaching to solve an issue that is being created by less than a half dozen property owners. Hopefully they will listen. I was in on a meeting the other day with a commissioner and someone from the local chamber and their were some really good solutions discussed to solve the problems. Now if they can figure out implementation.

solve an issue that is being created by less than a half dozen property owners.

I think you may have your numbers wrong...there are a lot of HOME OWNERS that live full time next to these rental homes and I think they also have rights too.
MRBS avatar
MRBSBeach Lover
#82
Sorry if I missed the answer if posted already, but if one rents a home for a week, that home being beach front,and gets the proper permitting for a 40+ attendee beach wedding, that they would be precluded from having the reception at the home? Thanks!
Matt J avatar
Matt JSWGB
#83
Sorry if I missed the answer if posted already, but if one rents a home for a week, that home being beach front,and gets the proper permitting for a 40+ attendee beach wedding, that they would be precluded from having the reception at the home? Thanks!

While the ordinance doesn't actually exclude you from having a wedding, it's a work around to prevent homes in residential areas from being used as wedding houses.

To answer your question, if you could find a house that slept 40+ you could have the reception at the home as long as you didn't exceed the occupancy limit. I only know of one house that could hold 40+ people and it's not gulf front.
WaltonIsOneBeach Lover
#84
Sorry if I missed the answer if posted already, but if one rents a home for a week, that home being beach front,and gets the proper permitting for a 40+ attendee beach wedding, that they would be precluded from having the reception at the home? Thanks!

In the proposed ordinance, under Section 7 Short Term Rentals item A states:

Is shall be a violation of this ordinance to advertise or operate a "Short Term Rental," located in a residential land use category, for use as a venue for weddings, corporate meetings and retreats, reunions and similar funtions.


Here is a try at an answer to the question:

1. If "one" is a person and not a "company" then under the proposed legislation, it might be possible, if there is a "loose" interpretation of the ordinance.

If there is a "strict" interpretation of the ordinance, then there would be no chance.

But, let us use a "loose" intepretation and assume that "one" is a person, not a corporation.

2. One could rent an 8 bedroom home which is at least 4000 square feet or larger in which one could have up to 20 people sleep in the home. (2 per bedroom=16, plus 4 = 20)

3. If the house can sleep 20, then one can have double the number of people visiting the house for the reception. So that is 40. You could have the wedding reception.

But........under a "strict" interpretation of the proposed ordinance;

It would matter how one interprets the word "Operate". If Operate is interpreted to mean the same as "Use" or "Have", then there is a problem.

If "Operate" means to "run" the Short Term Rental as a Wedding Venue Business, then one would definitely not be able to have the wedding.

Confusing, huh?

Keep in mind, under the loose interpretation of the proposed ordinance, the county's parking, noise, disturbing the peace, and lewd and lascivious conduct ordinances would apply and must be followed.

And of course, assuming one is a good "neighbor", one would be notifying all of the other property owners living around the rental house that the event was going to take place and that one would have it under control.

Before the ordinance is enacted, just go for it.

After the ordinance, well, one might just have to hire an attorney to "interpret" the law to make a decision.

It is unbelievable.

It is almost like trying to solve a crime when playing the game of Clue. Only to come up with the game winning solution that it was Colonel Mustard that hit Mrs. Peacock in the head with the candlestick in the Billard Room.

Edited

scooterbug44 avatar
scooterbug44SoWal Expert
#85
Sorry if I missed the answer if posted already, but if one rents a home for a week, that home being beach front,and gets the proper permitting for a 40+ attendee beach wedding, that they would be precluded from having the reception at the home? Thanks!

Since you can't technically get "proper permitting" to hold a commercial function in a residential structure, my guess is no.

But it's all clear as mud.
Matt J avatar
Matt JSWGB
#86
In the proposed ordinance, under Section 7 Short Term Rentals item A states:

Is shall be a violation of this ordinance to advertise or operate a "Short Term Rental," located in a residential land use category, for use as a venue for weddings, corporate meetings and retreats, reunions and similar funtions.


Here is a try at an answer to the question:

1. If "one" is a person and not a "company" then under the proposed legislation, it might be possible, if there is a "loose" interpretation of the ordinance.

If there is a "strict" interpretation of the ordinance, then there would be no chance.

But, let us use a "loose" intepretation and assume that "one" is a person, not a corporation.

2. One could rent an 8 bedroom home which is at least 4000 square feet or larger in which one could have up to 20 people sleep in the home. (2 per bedroom=16, plus 4 = 20)

3. If the house can sleep 20, then one can have double the number of people visiting the house for the reception. So that is 40. You could have the wedding reception.

But........under a "strict" interpretation of the proposed ordinance;

It would matter how one interprets the word "Operate". If Operate is interpreted to mean the same as "Use" or "Have", then there is a problem.

If "Operate" means to "run" the Short Term Rental as a Wedding Venue Business, then one would definitely not be able to have the wedding.

Confusing, huh?

Keep in mind, under the loose interpretation of the proposed ordinance, the county's parking, noise, disturbing the peace, and lewd and lascivious conduct ordinances would apply and must be followed.

And of course, assuming one is a good "neighbor", one would be notifying all of the other property owners living around the rental house that the event was going to take place and that one would have it under control.

Before the ordinance is enacted, just go for it.

After the ordinance, well, one might just have to hire an attorney to "interpret" the law to make a decision.

It is unbelievable.

It is almost like trying to solve a crime when playing the game of Clue. Only to come up with the game winning solution that it was Colonel Mustard that hit Mrs. Peacock in the head with the candlestick in the Billard Room.

Interesting, seeing as fire code only allows the number of people in the unit at any given time that it rents then the ordinance is already violating higher state laws.

BCC, please just let this die now and save the tax payers money.
miznotebook avatar
miznotebookBeach Fanatic
#87
Sorry if I missed the answer if posted already, but if one rents a home for a week, that home being beach front,and gets the proper permitting for a 40+ attendee beach wedding, that they would be precluded from having the reception at the home? Thanks!

Is a permit, other than a marriage license, needed for a wedding on the beach? I have not heard of this, but maybe someone else knows.

Regarding the reception, assuming that the home is in a residential area and you are renting for less than a six-month period, I would assume that there would be a violation involved with having the reception at the home, since it would likely be considered related to a wedding or a similar event. That is if the ordinance is approved.

However, from what I know about code enforcement, the person responsible for the violation would not be you, the renter, but the property owner who allowed their short-term rental home to be used in this manner. I understand that many property owners communicate to renters that they may not hold weddings and receptions on their properties, and I imagine that if the ordinance is passed, more of them would have that policy.
Matt J avatar
Matt JSWGB
#88
If your beach gathering has more than 50 people I believe you are required to have a permit from WCSO for public gatherings. wrobert mentioned something about this at one time.
Andy A avatar
Andy ABeach Fanatic
#89
I understand the square footage requirement for short term rental occupancy may go south...and it should. This does not mean any kind of commercial enterprise should be allowed to be conducted in residential venues. They are two entirely different issues but one is trying to be used to solve the other.
miznotebook avatar
miznotebookBeach Fanatic
#90
The public hearing for the ordinance has been delayed until April 12 due to an error with the legal notice for the hearing. The hearing will be in conjunction with the BCC meeting on that date, which begins at 4 p.m. and takes place at the South Walton Annex.

Checking your forum account

Please wait while we verify your forum account.