Cindy Meadows, Why you gotta be so rude?

Your story was discredited because you made it seem like Jones ordered some sort of sweep from FDOT, then went to Holmes County and said a bunch of Tony Phony signs were her property, and then refused to return them, and then said you didn't want your sign back because you got a new one, and then you called the sheriff to get it back, all according to this thread.

But you did manage to get what, three agencies of government on the case.

That is a BOLD FACED LIE! I never ever once insinuated that Cecilia Jones ordered that sweep!! What I said was the DOT guy told me that when they do these kind of sweeps, its generally because they are complaint driven! I asked specifically if this sweep was complaint driven and he told me he did not know!! To this day I DO NOT KNOW that it was but I DO NOT know that it was not.

Every freaking time you are on this board you try to change my words around to suit your own agenda. I'm asking you to stop doing that!! If you are going to quote me that's one thing but to just make up BS haphazardly because you obviously have an agenda is another!! Stop it!

3 agencies? Wow! You can count, I'm impressed. You did get one fact right! It would have been only one agency if Chief Weeks had any kahunas but we all see how that worked out for me. It was actually the DOT's job to return all signs removed from private property so I had no choice but to involve them so, they don't really count.

I have NO IDEA how the State Attorney ended up involved in this fiasco but I'll tell you what I suspect his involvement was. The GROUP of Anderson fans posting on this board have alluded to those signs being illegal. If in fact the sign was illegal, its my educated guess that the sign would not have been returned to me. So Indestructible you tell me, who the hello has screamed the loudest that those signs are illegal other than Cecilia Jones and Tony Anderson fans?

That is a BOLD FACED LIE! I never ever once insinuated that Cecilia Jones ordered that sweep!! What I said was the DOT guy told me that when they do these kind of sweeps, its generally because they are complaint driven! I asked specifically if this sweep was complaint driven and he told me he did not know!! To this day I DO NOT KNOW that it was but I DO NOT know that it was not.

Every freaking time you are on this board you try to change my words around to suit your own agenda. I'm asking you to stop doing that!! If you are going to quote me that's one thing but to just make up BS haphazardly because you obviously have an agenda is another!! Stop it!

3 agencies? Wow! You can count, I'm impressed. You did get one fact right! It would have been only one agency if Chief Weeks had any kahunas but we all see how that worked out for me. It was actually the DOT's job to return all signs removed from private property so I had no choice but to involve them so, they don't really count.

I have NO IDEA how the State Attorney ended up involved in this fiasco but I'll tell you what I suspect his involvement was. The GROUP of Anderson fans posting on this board have alluded to those signs being illegal. If in fact the sign was illegal, its my educated guess that the sign would not have been returned to me. So Indestructible you tell me, who the hello has screamed the loudest that those signs are illegal other than Cecilia Jones and Tony Anderson fans?

Why so serious?

That is a BOLD FACED LIE! I never ever once insinuated that Cecilia Jones ordered that sweep!! What I said was the DOT guy told me that when they do these kind of sweeps, its generally because they are complaint driven! I asked specifically if this sweep was complaint driven and he told me he did not know!! To this day I DO NOT KNOW that it was but I DO NOT know that it was not.

Every freaking time you are on this board you try to change my words around to suit your own agenda. I'm asking you to stop doing that!! If you are going to quote me that's one thing but to just make up BS haphazardly because you obviously have an agenda is another!! Stop it!

3 agencies? Wow! You can count, I'm impressed. You did get one fact right! It would have been only one agency if Chief Weeks had any kahunas but we all see how that worked out for me. It was actually the DOT's job to return all signs removed from private property so I had no choice but to involve them so, they don't really count.

I have NO IDEA how the State Attorney ended up involved in this fiasco but I'll tell you what I suspect his involvement was. The GROUP of Anderson fans posting on this board have alluded to those signs being illegal. If in fact the sign was illegal, its my educated guess that the sign would not have been returned to me. So Indestructible you tell me, who the hello has screamed the loudest that those signs are illegal other than Cecilia Jones and Tony Anderson fans?

Ok for the record, on Wednesday at 8:37 am you wrote:

"Just what are the chances that the DOT would do a sweep of C. Jones District, illegally remove political signs from my front yard or that Cecilia Jones would be at the DOT pick-up point, the exact same day my signs were taken, to pick up ONLY signs regarding Tony Anderson? Coincidence or target? It's highly unlikely this is just one big coincidence or that there has not been an enormous effort on the part of Cecilia Jones to target one of her own constituents!"

And also: I DO NOT BELIEVE THE SIGNS ARE ILLEGAL. I don't know how a sign can be "illegal." It's speech. Maybe it needs a disclaimer, but what the heck do I know.

I agree your signs...none of them...should have been taken.

The rest has been IMO one big distraction and misdirection.

Ok for the record, on Wednesday at 8:37 am you wrote:

"Just what are the chances that the DOT would do a sweep of C. Jones District, illegally remove political signs from my front yard or that Cecilia Jones would be at the DOT pick-up point, the exact same day my signs were taken, to pick up ONLY signs regarding Tony Anderson? Coincidence or target? It's highly unlikely this is just one big coincidence or that there has not been an enormous effort on the part of Cecilia Jones to target one of her own constituents!"

And also: I DO NOT BELIEVE THE SIGNS ARE ILLEGAL. I don't know how a sign can be "illegal." It's speech. Maybe it needs a disclaimer, but what the heck do I know.

I agree your signs...none of them...should have been taken.

The rest has been IMO one big distraction and misdirection.

For the record I was asking questions! DO YOU NOT SEE the question marks? I do still believe it's highly unlikely it was all coincidental but I can't prove that!! Did I become her target after she got her hands on property she knew didn't belong to her when she took it from the DOT? Absolutely.

Who created the distraction Indestructible? I didn't pick up property belonging to C. Jones or T. Anderson.

Wow, lots of quality issues being discuss here.

Can we please leave the woman who's rights have be trampled under foot alone?

Really, C. Jones has stepped in S#\+ and has been scraping her shoe on a rock for two days now...

We have a serious election and if an outsider for this community ever read the crap on here, they'd run the other way (new residents).

I've never seen such nonsense.

Misty had her sign unlawfully removed, no dispute.

She did what a citizen of her town should do and got no results.

She used the most precious of our rights, free speech and has been attacked for it.

She sought out someone to help and actually found many.

The attention is not her, it's our Commissioner that has crossed the line of ethical behavior and good taste.

If we can't discuss real issues, like; beach vendors, business licenses, zoning, water run off, parking, beach access, etc, this is all just a pissing match between two parties of people with different opinions.

Not sure what your point is?

If I'm a well educated professional that would qualify for the school superintendent job, I'd pursue the job opportunity that was awarded based on my experience, interview, etc. rather than running in a small town election where hillbillies are labeling me or my opponent "Rude Cindy" or "Puppet Tony". Local elections typically follow Sayre's Law - "In any dispute the intensity of feeling is inversely proportional to the value of the issues at stake." The district 5 commissioner election is the perfect example of that. For most well educated professionals, local elections are not worth the headache, especially, given the innate nature of their qualifications, there are many other options out there.

Pure democracy is fine, but more often than not the people are delivered Barabbas.

If I'm a well educated professional that would qualify for the school superintendent job, I'd pursue the job opportunity that was awarded based on my experience, interview, etc. rather than running in a small town election where hillbillies are labeling me or my opponent "Rude Cindy" or "Puppet Tony". Local elections typically follow Sayre's Law - "In any dispute the intensity of feeling is inversely proportional to the value of the issues at stake." The district 5 commissioner election is the perfect example of that. For most well educated professionals, local elections are not worth the headache, especially, given the innate nature of their qualifications, there are many other options out there.

Pure democracy is fine, but more often than not the people are delivered Barabbas.

Oh I remember you... and still lost as to your point.

Oh I remember you... and still lost as to your point.

Not sure that we've ever conversed or if I've ever even posted on the topic but ok if you remember me. Sorry you're missing the point - that's as well as I can explain it. I won't invoke Ed Koch because I was mostly agreeing with you.

Got to go. Bye Cindy

Yikes.

I may not like your political speech but it is your speech, it is protected speech, and you can march in a personal parade of signs if you want...I do not care.

Your story was discredited because you made it seem like Jones ordered some sort of sweep from FDOT, then went to Holmes County and said a bunch of Tony Phony signs were her property, and then refused to return them, and then said you didn't want your sign back because you got a new one, and then you called the sheriff to get it back, all according to this thread.

Turns out FDOT removed all the signs everywhere and jones had nothing to do with it...she picked up hundreds of signs for multiple candidates because she's a nice person and ONE of them happened to be a Tony Phony sign mixed in with the real Tony signs....and it was returned as soon as it was actually located.

But you did manage to get what, three agencies of government on the case.

And don't forget Santa!!! She also got two extra signs!! Lol!

And don't forget Santa!!! She also got two extra signs!! Lol!

LOL! My yard looks like a Christmas tree decorated with "Phony Tony" signs.

It wasn't three agencies either but that's Indestructible's lie.

The DOT was responsible for bringing the signs back, It was their job. The DFS PD washed their hands of it so, they can't be counted. The WCSO only real involvement was bringing the sign back which they did.

I DID NOT contact the State Attorney. Cecilia Jones did trying to cover her own !

So, there was really only one agency involved. Thanks again WCSO!

Ohhhhhh

This should be played at all the voting Precincts on repeat

THIS SHOULD BE POSTED AT ALL PRECINCTS!

THIS SHOULD BE POSTED AT ALL PRECINCTS!

View attachment 61734

Didn't you already put these signs up at all the precincts?!

LOL! My yard looks like a Christmas tree decorated with "Phony Tony" signs.

It wasn't three agencies either but that's Indestructible's lie.

The DOT was responsible for bringing the signs back, It was their job. The DFS PD washed their hands of it so, they can't be counted. The WCSO only real involvement was bringing the sign back which they did.

I DID NOT contact the State Attorney. Cecilia Jones did trying to cover her own !

So, there was really only one agency involved. Thanks again WCSO!

Not a lie.

1) DOT
2) DFS police
3) WCSO

That's three agencies that are back to work for the people now and not worrying about your sign!

Not a lie.

1) DOT
2) DFS police
3) WCSO

That's three agencies that are back to work for the people now and not worrying about your sign!

If Cecilia Jones had not knowingly taken the sign illegally from the DOT we wouldn't even be having this conversation!

It was one law enforcement division! DFS PD did nothing!

Didn't you already put these signs up at all the precincts?!

Nope! Wasn't me! But you get a happy dance cause I'm glad they are there!

P.S. Is Cecilia Jones going to throw a HISSY FIT at every precinct to have them removed like she did in SoWal?

Ohhhhhh

This is still better.

Born & Bread, I don't know who you are because that is your choice. I know who you plan to/have voted for because you choose to reveal that. Who you vote for is your right and you can choose the reasons behind that vote. You can denounce those signs because they are not very nice and they are tacky. That is your right as well. You can choose not to answer Bob Well's questions because as you point out you are not a candidate. But two wrongs do not make a right. While you can also choose to repeatedly play a tacky video that is not nice, ask yourself, is that really who you want to be? Have you ever lost your temper at work or said things you wish you had not? I know I have. The difference in you and I and Ms. Meadows is that when we lost our temper or said things we wished we had not, a video camera was not there to record it and someone with no moral compass did not decide to take those moments and edit them to really make us look bad. If Tony Anderson is the man I think he is he would not want to win on this sort of stuff but would want to win on the issues. Is this really who ya'll want to be?

Great points Danny. We all make mistakes and sometimes say things in heated situations, on this forum and in other places.

All I know is that the results will be in Tuesday night.

If Mr. Anderson wins, good for him and perhaps he'll reign in his attack hounds.

If Meadows wins, the Anderson camp can look no further to C. Jones and her antics this campaign. I'd also expect to see a large dump of $ into Amy Cobbles campaign account.

Anyway you slice it, I think a large amount of citizens have had Enough of Commissioner Jones and its going to be a focused effort to find a replacement over the next two years.

In closing, Danny G., Please consider running for local office. People from N, middle and S, respect you. You are a fair and honest man. You know what this County needs. You have vision.

@Danny Glidewell...I don't agree the signs are any more or any less tacky than the PAC ads and videos put out by the C. Jones and Phony Tony fan club against Cindy Meadows.

I think people are under the mistaken impression that this "tackiness" is something new to Cecilia Jones when in FACT it is her Standard Operating Procedure! Cecilia Jones and her (I'm not sure what to call him..."husband", "soon to be EX", "has been", goon) have operated through threats, intimidation, bullying, targeted Grand Jury investigations, theft by deception. GUNS and violence for YEARS in this county. It is the way Cecilia Jones does business!

I think the new level of tackiness arose when Cecilia Jones and her motley band of thugs convinced Tony Anderson (an unsuspecting, retired mailman, with no qualifications, no experience and NO CLUE) to belly up to her brand of doing business in this County and people are NO LONGER afraid of her and have opted instead to fight fire with fire!!

Tacky? That's a matter of opinion! Effective? We shall see Tuesday!!

Regardless of the outcome, Cecilia Jones has got to go! Let's all work on that!