Back to All About SoWal

Mike Huckabee’s role in pushing controversial beach access law

Teresa avatar
SoWal Guide
37,871 views1
Mike Huckabee’s role in pushing controversial beach access law

Newly-released emails show an exchange between the former Arkansas governor and a key senator.



A beach sign in Destin [Scott Keeler - Times]
By Steve Bousquet
9/10/2018

Scott skipped a planned campaign stop in Walton County on Sunday to avoid protesters who oppose his stand on the issue.

On Jan. 12, Huckabee wrote an email to Passidomo, thanking her for her sponsorship of a bill "involving the customary use abuse by Walton Co."

"I'm one of those beachfront owners whose title goes to mean high water line," he wrote. "Walton Co. taxes me on that property and I pay handsomely for it! I actually don't mind people who simply want to enjoy the beach and certainly not walk on or past. … What beachfront owners object to is illegal taking of taxed and titled property without compensation or even consideration. In fact, we are demonized as 'greedy, selfish and rich' owners who want to deprive the poor of their 'rights.'


Here's more of Huckabee's email to Passidomo.



In reply, Passidomo called customary use a "contentious issue" and said there has been a lot of confusion and misunderstanding about it.

"What happened in Walton County seems to me to be the county acting as prosecutor, judge and jury, all for the county's benefit," Passidomo wrote.

In response, Huckabee wrote back to Passidomo and said: "Either private property rights mean something or they don't. I'm genuinely thankful that you are fighting this battle."

Santa Rosa Beach attorney Daniel Uhlfelder, a leader of Florida Beaches for All, a local group that wants to preserve beach use, said Huckabee's view is wrong. "It's not a private property rights issue," Uhlfelder said. "It's about the use of beaches."
https://www.tampabay.com/florida-politics/buzz/2018/09/10/mike-huckabees-role-in-pushing-for-controversial-beach-access-law/

Replies

142
Teresa avatar
SoWal GuideAuthor
#77
PEACE LOVE BEACH
⛱️⛱️⛱️⛱️

Last fall I spent a week here on the Gulf in Inlet Beach. What a magical time of year to soak up the warm fall, take long walks, explore Lake Powell and beaches stretching east and west. I was staying at my aunt's beach house. There was no worry or even a single sign or rope that warned of private beaches anywhere in sight in either direction we wandered. The peace and beauty were totally uninterrupted. There is no place on earth like our little piece of the planet. I don't know why we would accept private property signs and chains as part of our coastal landscape. We can do better.

View attachment 72615
Shannon Lince avatar
Beach Lover
#78
@FloridaBeachBum I agree with you that Huckabee has a right to his opinion regarding customary use. There is no conspiracy to my knowledge. Just proof that he moved here to the beautiful beaches of South Walton Florida. Then over time decided that his beach front needed to be protected from the public. Not a neighborly thing to do in the opinion of many who live, play, work and visit here. The community has a lot of questions about his motivations and involvement. And they have a right to not be happy with his stance.

I stand with our community as always. I am in awe of the outpouring of local people, leaders, volunteers and all of the energy that we are witnessing in response to Customary Use. I also appreciate hearing from you and other beach front owners. All voices are important. I hope we can be kind and respectful of one another throughout this process. We are all here together. I am seeing some desperate people being petty and unproductive. Slamming their neighbors. That's truly unfortunate.

I'm sorry to see the issue become so politicized by using the private property rights angle. I agree with Daniel and Florida Beaches For All that it is about use of our beaches. Other coastal communities don't face our battle for the beaches. Because customary use is just a normal everyday thing whether they call it that or not. Those communities know that they are ultimately responsible for protecting access to the beaches and also preserving those beaches for all time. The health of their coastal environment and economy depends on it.

You are suing me in court, costing me tens of thousands of dollars - but you want us all to be kind and respectful to one another?

Yes I entirely agree, slamming your neighbors with a lawsuit and is beyond unfortunate - it's malicious.

Shannon
Teresa avatar
SoWal GuideAuthor
#791
You are suing me in court, costing me tens of thousands of dollars - but you want us all to be kind and respectful to one another?

Yes I entirely agree, slamming your neighbors with a lawsuit and is beyond unfortunate - it's malicious.

Shannon

This was not the community's decision. The great majority of people wrote, called and implored the governor not to sign this bill. I don't like that Walton County was singled out. But it's what we've got thanks to Huckabee, Rick Scott and other Florida representatives who thought a court process would be the best solution. It's not malicious. It just is what it is. I'm sorry.

And yes I do wish PEACE for all of us and that includes you. Your concerns are as important as anyone else in our community. I am sure you are involved and will be actively learning and supporting your community like so many here who love living and working here.

FB_IMG_1537031752630.jpg
Dave Rauschkolb avatar
Beach Fanatic
#80
Referring to the subject of this Thread, Governor Huckabee was using the private beach narrative all the way back to 2015 when the BFO's mobilized to stop beach nourishment. An act that would have nullified this quiet title bid(s). Well, he has one. We will see if he gets another one on the property he just bought next door.

It is clear the Walton County Board of Commissioners are eying up these quiet titles for challenges. The Headland case appears to have possibly been an intentional a pass made by the beachfront owners, lawyers to perhaps avoid a precedent loss on a quiet title. They dropped their bid. It was good news and a surprise at the recent BCC meeting but you have to wonder why they dropped it.

Anyway, an interesting read on Governor Huckabee's efforts to stop beach nourishment. The one thing I agreed with him on was the sand must be pure when the do it. I think Beachfront owners will change their tune on beach nourishment if we get a Cat 4 hurricane and 15 foot tidal surges. People forget quickly but I don't. The truth is armoring and geo tubes do nothing to stop a 15 to 20 tidal surge. Wedding cake slices off the primary dune bluff and homes falling into the sea. One storm and they will be screaming for beach nourishment and that will change everything again. I've never been a fan of beach nourishment either but I've changed my mind.

Huckabee Battles a Government Initiative (In His Florida Neighborhood)
Shannon Lince avatar
Beach Lover
#81
This was not our decision. This was the decision of a handful of beach front owners. I don't like that Walton County was singled out. But it's what we've got thanks to Huckabee, Rick Scott and other Florida representatives who thought a court process would be the best solution. It's not malicious. It just is what it is. I'm sorry.

Yes I do wish peace for all of us and that includes you. Your concerns are as important as anyone else in our community. I am sure you are involved and will be actively learning and supporting your community like so many here who love living and working here.

Yes, this is your decision. The other two counties who did prevail with customary use went through the courts. It's Walton county that did not follow the precedent and legal requirements when voting in an ordinance. This has always been a court decision, HB631 only codified it in the statutes to prevent something this serious from happening again without going through the courts.

There isn't a place in Florida that you can obtain an easement or right to someone else's property without going through a court and suing the property owner. Walton county is not exempt of these basic legal requirements. Blaming others because they understood these very basic legal principles that are taught in law 101 and in place since Florida's founding seems unnatural.

If it truly is about just a handful of beach owners - then the appropriate action is to sue them. I'm not keeping any locals off my property, but I object to being forced by fiat to handle unlimited populations and overcrowding density. It's not fair or right for you or anyone else to ask me to take on this public burden.

While I can understand your good intentions, the methods have been far from innocent.

Shannon

Edited

Beach Fanatic
#82
Even if all, 1000 is a mere handful compared to the number of people who have used the beach uninterrupted since ancient times including the indigineous people of the area.
Robert D avatar
Beach Lover
#83
Too bad we didn't take care of our business before Huckabee moved here.

He barged in and built a giant mansion in a quiet neighborhood, lit it up like Christmas, and built a 12 foot brick wall around it. Not neighborly. He doesn't belong here and is not welcomed by anyone except a few who buy into his particular brand of charlatanism.

@Shannon Lince seems to be of the same ilk. Barging onto the forum and trying to push people around. Only interested in forcing her opinion onto others. Not a good community member.
Shannon Lince avatar
Beach Lover
#84
Too bad we didn't take care of our business before Huckabee moved here.

He barged in and built a giant mansion in a quiet neighborhood, lit it up like Christmas, and built a 12 foot brick wall around it. Not neighborly. He doesn't belong here and is not welcomed by anyone except a few who buy into his particular brand of charlatanism.

@Shannon Lince seems to be of the same ilk. Barging onto the forum and trying to push people around. Only interested in forcing her opinion onto others. Not a good community member.

You make a lot of assumptions and exactly who are you to decide who is belongs here and who doesn't?

Shannon
Dawn avatar
Beach Fanatic
#85
You make a lot of assumptions and exactly who are you to decide who is belongs here and who doesn't?

Shannon
:benice:
jodiFL avatar
Beach Fanatic
#86
Me thinks someone didnt research where they were moving to and went on emotions alone when buying in a resort area. Now they realize its not all rainbows and unicorn farts in paradise and want to turn it into something different than what it is and to be more like THEIR idea of what it should be. Good luck with that.
Beach Fanatic
#87
Me thinks someone didnt research where they were moving to and went on emotions alone when buying in a resort area. Now they realize its not all rainbows and unicorn farts in paradise and want to turn it into something different than what it is and to be more like THEIR idea of what it should be. Good luck with that.
Haha we gots rednecks
jodiFL avatar
Beach Fanatic
#88
Haha we gots rednecks
Yep...had one woman ask us not to disturb the peaceful nature of Pt. Washington with fireworks not too long ago. I hated to burst her bubble when I told her that she was in the middle of a wildlife management area and that they probably weren't fireworks.
:whitetrash:
lazin&drinkin avatar
Beach Lover
#89
Referring to the subject of this Thread, Governor Huckabee was using the private beach narrative all the way back to 2015 when the BFO's mobilized to stop beach nourishment. An act that would have nullified this quiet title bid(s). Well, he has one. We will see if he gets another one on the property he just bought next door.

It is clear the Walton County Board of Commissioners are eying up these quiet titles for challenges. The Headland case appears to have possibly been an intentional a pass made by the beachfront owners, lawyers to perhaps avoid a precedent loss on a quiet title. They dropped their bid. It was good news and a surprise at the recent BCC meeting but you have to wonder why they dropped it.

Anyway, an interesting read on Governor Huckabee's efforts to stop beach nourishment. The one thing I agreed with him on was the sand must be pure when the do it. I think Beachfront owners will change their tune on beach nourishment if we get a Cat 4 hurricane and 15 foot tidal surges. People forget quickly but I don't. The truth is armoring and geo tubes do nothing to stop a 15 to 20 tidal surge. Wedding cake slices off the primary dune bluff and homes falling into the sea. One storm and they will be screaming for beach nourishment and that will change everything again. I've never been a fan of beach nourishment either but I've changed my mind.

Huckabee Battles a Government Initiative (In His Florida Neighborhood)

Should there be such a storm, and sooner or later there will be, private properties, including beaches, should be repaired/restored with private, not public, money. I think your opinion that private owners would be screaming for public funds in such instance is totally unfounded and, given the recent, current, and foreseeable circumstances, entirely likely to be 180 degrees from the truth.
Jenksy avatar
Beach Fanatic
#90
What a thing to say.

My neighborhood beach has been private since the 1970's. I don't purchase property on emotions, and I am well aware of what it has been and what it is now. I have several neighbors who have been here since the beginning and are not approving of what is going on here. Those are the ones I feel for, they are fully retired and on fixed incomes, they shouldn't have to spend their retirement funds they worked all their lives for, to defend against you all, fighting for property they have owned for over 40 years. It's a disgrace.

I will agree that we (my husband and I) were sold a bill of goods, about the area and the people. We have met some good people, some wonderful people and more awful ones more than I imagined could exist in a quaint beach town.

Believe me we regret trying to make a home here. This isn't what nice people do to each other. Called every name in the book, not welcome here, don't belong, not legitimate, views not valid, not part of the community, mean, greedy, selfish, be nice (which means to roll over) or leave, including criminal acts - all because I bought a single family home and moved here. I had not done anything to anyone. This sure as heck isn't the South I grew up in.

But I will tell you this. To get to the several 70+ year old retired neighbors of mine, you are going have to go through me first.

Shannon
Sounds like it's time to move on and find a place you can enjoy your remaining years.
jodiFL avatar
Beach Fanatic
#91
Sounds like it's time to move on and find a place you can enjoy your remaining years.
Might want to sell before the customary use debacle we have found ourselves in causes the property values to bottom out and those foreclosures start showing up because of the people that cant afford it without the rental income.
lazin&drinkin avatar
Beach Lover
#92
The name-calling and overt hostility of the emotional, if ignorant of the law, majority of posters here its unfortunately typical of the Antifa mindset to which they have succumbed. Not to suggest that any of them have less than at least room temperature intellects, but they sure have emotions with which to compensate, at least among one another.
Jenksy avatar
Beach Fanatic
#93
The name-calling and overt hostility of the emotional, if ignorant of the law, majority of posters here its unfortunately typical of the Antifa mindset to which they have succumbed. Not to suggest that any of them have less than at least room temperature intellects, but they sure have emotions with which to compensate, at least among one another.
Quite revealing that you would bring up fascism.
Beach Fanatic
#94
The name-calling and overt hostility of the emotional, if ignorant of the law, majority of posters here its unfortunately typical of the Antifa mindset to which they have succumbed. Not to suggest that any of them have less than at least room temperature intellects, but they sure have emotions with which to compensate, at least among one another.

Politicizing this topic and passive aggressive attacks are desperate. Condescending? Perhaps. You go ahead and you do you, as it were.

Search the forum and see that I voted Trump (coservative my entire life) but have reached common ground on this subject with those that politically disagree with me.
BlueMtnBeachVagrant avatar
Beach Fanatic
#95
Santa Rosa Beach attorney Daniel Uhlfelder, a leader of Florida Beaches for All, a local group that wants to preserve beach use, said Huckabee's view is wrong. "It's not a private property rights issue," Uhlfelder said. "It's about the use of beaches."
You mean the use of the beaches, which is fee simple property with title and a deed and a bundle of property rights - the most important one being private use and enjoyment, is not a property rights issue!? I don't think I'd seek out Uhlfelder's legal advice.

I personally could never retain Uhlfelder. I still can’t believe he pulled out the Nazi card at a previous CU meeting where he compared GFOs to Nazis.... “and that’s why my grandparents escaped from the Nazis and came to the United States, to escape oppression (private property rights) like this.” Pretty damn insensitive and opportunistic thing to say, especially to those who lost family in the war.

His intentional and repeated antagonism of BFOs and the sheriff’s department reveals who he is. And PLEASE don’t elevate his methods by comparing him to Rosa Parks. Don’t much care for his artsy fartsy partner in crime either.

His actions promotes anarchy because the sheriff is afraid to arrest anybody for trespassing for political purposes. Yet the law TODAY supports that privately owned beach is private, pure and simple. So we have a recipe for disaster where a tourist or local challenges a homeowner and the situation escalates resulting in injury or death. (We’ve all seen YouTube videos where he gets away with trespassing.) And then think the whole scenario could have possibly been averted if they were more initially concerned that they could be arrested for trespassing instead of receiving just a slap on the hand - that they would avoid the confrontation altogether. Isn’t that what properly enforced laws with police power is all about - to discourage bad behavior and prevent anarchy?

In case you missed it, I really don’t like Uhlfelder’s methods.
PoppaJ avatar
SoWal Insider
#96
The name-calling and overt hostility of the emotional, if ignorant of the law, majority of posters here its unfortunately typical of the Antifa mindset to which they have succumbed. Not to suggest that any of them have less than at least room temperature intellects, but they sure have emotions with which to compensate, at least among one another.
He says while he lovingly polishes his Tiki Torch.
boomerang avatar
Beach Lover
#97
Huckabee is the single worse thing that ever happened to Walton county - and to deny this is his cause is idiotic.

I am conservative and a believer.

He is a selfish through and through - and does not care about the people who live here not wealthy enough to I've in beach front hoods.
bob bob avatar
Beach Fanatic
#98
I personally could never retain Uhlfelder. I still can’t believe he pulled out the Nazi card at a previous CU meeting where he compared GFOs to Nazis.... “and that’s why my grandparents escaped from the Nazis and came to the United States, to escape oppression (private property rights) like this.” Pretty damn insensitive and opportunistic thing to say, especially to those who lost family in the war.

His intentional and repeated antagonism of BFOs and the sheriff’s department reveals who he is. And PLEASE don’t elevate his methods by comparing him to Rosa Parks. Don’t much care for his artsy fartsy partner in crime either.

His actions promotes anarchy because the sheriff is afraid to arrest anybody for trespassing for political purposes. Yet the law TODAY supports that privately owned beach is private, pure and simple. So we have a recipe for disaster where a tourist or local challenges a homeowner and the situation escalates resulting in injury or death. (We’ve all seen YouTube videos where he gets away with trespassing.) And then think the whole scenario could have possibly been averted if they were more initially concerned that they could be arrested for trespassing instead of receiving just a slap on the hand - that they would avoid the confrontation altogether. Isn’t that what properly enforced laws with police power is all about - to discourage bad behavior and prevent anarchy?

In case you missed it, I really don’t like Uhlfelder’s methods.
artsy fartsy?!?

:wacko:
Bob Wells avatar
Beach Fanatic
#99
Bob, you did give a specific answer that you would not hold commissioners accountable. Then made a leap from accountability to golden parachutes and some person answering the phone.
Your point I think is “The lack of Customary Use will negatively affect tourism which will affect employment opportunities.”

Give me some evidence - some facts that without customary use Walton local economy will be devastated.

Here’s my facts; it’s been reported that 60% for FL coast is private property. Every Florida coastal county but 2 do NOT have customary use, including the counties on both sides of Walton, Okaloosa and Bay. Even before April 17, 2017 declared customary use ordinance and after July 2018 Walton’s economy and property values have gone up. Ask bob bob, he posted July bed tax was up 4% over 2017. Bed tax has been up each year for many years including years before Walton commissioners declared custom on private property and now after.

That Walton’s economy will collapse sounds more like opinion and fear mongering for your and the commissioner’s customary use agenda, not facts. You don’t run a business or a county, well, on supposition and opinions. It's supply and demand - private owners earned what they have - the supply - and you just can't take property rights you want or create a story that owner's never owned it.

Even if true the commissioners would be responsible, not the property owners, for the house of cards (and local economy) the commissioners (and developers and REALTORS) built, based on more than a hundred MILLION of dollars of TDC tax payer money over 20 years telling tourist to come to Walton’s 26 miles of public beaches (except it’s about 75% private beaches). And don’t worry about being respectful or that trash you left behind since beachfront owners were gracious enough to share their property with you over the decades.

Why does it matter how long I or anyone else have lived here or if I’m a beachfront owner!? Does that give a person some special knowledge of the law or facts that's different in Walton? If you have read my previous posts you’d know. Since 2015 how any times has the Sheriff been called for trespass and removed ANYONE from private property? I’d guess the Sheriff has been called many times and no one’s been removed. I’ve been here long enough to know the elected Sheriff has made a political decision not to enforce the law that protects property owners right to private and peaceful enjoyment of their property. Even when owners have complied with the Sheriff’s onerous trespass standard operating procedure and or his made-up arbitrary “wet sand” property boundary. Even if you trespass and destroy court approved signs on private property you will not be charged with trespass.

You didn’t answer my previous question; have you read Blackstone’s Commentary of old English common law custom and it’s criteria? I’m sure our understanding of how ancient custom applies to Walton today 253 years later will differ but have you read it? It’s the foundation of all American customary use. Have you read the Constitution Bill of Rights 5th Amendment - rejecting much of that old English common law - and is the law of the land in the United States of America? It’s only tax payers money to litigate - would the commissioners or you spend your own money to litigate for public customary use on private property? Beachfront owners will. If private property rights prevail the least the commissioners should do is resign and hopefully voters will wake up and elect competent experience people to lead Walton County and spend their $171,400,000 wisely. It’s one thing to repair a road and another to litigate millions of tax payer dollars on Constitutional litigation that could have repaired that road and may result in nothing but ill will for a long time to come.
Look, I have been respectful to you and continue to be. We just disagree. If you are so sure of your position then you should relax and await your payday. If prior to 2015 you were able to exercise your property rights over CU then it should be an easy task to prevail in the courts. If you did not enforce your property rights that you believed you had prior to that, I think you will lose at all our expense. But I am not schooled in the law and am more than willing to let the courts decide. I understand why you continue to share what you share, because you want to spare me the expense of a protracted legal case as a taxpayer. I am certainly not trying to scare people to the cause of CU, by what I believe could happen to the economy. I do believe it will damage it, but I think had I not said anything or not, CU is a more attractive alternative to what is currently occuring. I hope you have a wonderful day and truly don't hold any ill will toward you. As I see this conversation is getting angry and really prefer not to be frustrated by the name calling and arrogance being displayed by many involved, this is the last I will discuss it. Again have a great day.
BlueMtnBeachVagrant avatar
Beach Fanatic
#100
I believe in ————. I also believe it will be decided by the Courts and whatever side happens to win the legal challenge we all lose because of the arrogance and bitterness it has brought out in us all. But hey this is our society now. So everyone get your digs in because the superiority of our cause is more righteous than the others, no matter what side of the debate you are on. Just my opinion!
If one removes the CU from your post, I personally and probably many others agree with the rest.
BlueMtnBeachVagrant avatar
Beach Fanatic
#101
.....As I see this conversation is getting angry and really prefer not to be frustrated by the name calling and arrogance being displayed by many involved, this is the last I will discuss it. Again have a great day.

Did I miss something?

BFOs have from day one been decribed as mean and greedy....and now arrogant? Bob, who exactly is doing the name calling? What standards do they apply?

Oh never mind, I see you’re not ever going to discuss this situation any longer.

When people challenge the intellectual process of others, they’re called arrogant here on SoWal from what I can see.

Edited

Checking your forum account

Please wait while we verify your forum account.