Below is a letter written by Mike Huckabee to the Tallahassee Democrat:
Re: Private beaches for the wealthy, paid by the taxpayers
This recent column was a bigger fantasy than Adam Schiff's saying he had evidence of Russia collusion!
It stated that, "Wealthy beachfront property owners, however, led by former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, rebelled. They lobbied the Legislature into passing House Bill 631, making it easy for beachfront owners to employ the courts to block the beach. Threatening signs, fences and security guards have been employed to block public beach use."
My “leadership” was limited to sending one email to a state senator’s public website to thank her for taking the time to understand that HB 631 didn’t change ownership of one inch of beach.
Public beaches were and still are public. Beaches deeded as privately owned can’t be confiscated by the government by administrative act. The county must comply with the constitutional protection for private property. If a government wishes to take someone’s property, it must do so through the judicial branch. A legislative body such as the county commissioners can’t conduct a judicial function. It’s a simple separation of powers issue.
Walton County is now seeking to take property it once sold and deeded over to private developments and individuals, using an Old English “customary use” doctrine. Most of us thought our own Constitution — specifically the Fourth and Fifth Amendments — took precedence over some English custom, but today’s new socialists believe if they want it, just get government to take it and pay the owners nothing.
Walton County has already spent north of $1 million on high-octane lawyers suing their own taxpayers, who are now forced to hire attorneys to defend themselves and their property. In other words, beachfront owners are paying both sides of the lawsuit.
Those who demand “customary use” aren’t prohibited from seeking it, but they can’t just obtain it by having politicians do it. They must prove in court that their desire for someone else’s land is more legitimate than the actual deed held by property owners.
No one is “prohibited” from using public beaches, and there are miles of them in Walton County. Most beachfront owners don’t run people off their property, anyway. I haven’t, and despite the lies told, I’ve not placed signs prohibiting people from responsible use of my property.
Had Mr. Lotane done his homework, he would have learned that when Walton County wanted to “re-nourish” the beaches, including those on private property, over 93% of us said “No, we do not want the county to re-nourish beach on private land. That is a homeowner’s responsibility — not the taxpayers.'”
Sadly, the class warfare language of “wealthy people” misses the point. It’s not about wealth. It’s about the law, stuff most of us learned in 9th grade civics.
Replies
26
Beach Fanatic
Let them eat cake.
SoWal Insider
Below is a letter written by Mike Huckabee to the Tallahassee Democrat:“It’s about the law” yea right except when it comes to lawfully issuing marriage licenses to gays. Crawl back in your hole with your lying daughter.
Re: Private beaches for the wealthy, paid by the taxpayers
This recent column was a bigger fantasy than Adam Schiff's saying he had evidence of Russia collusion!
It stated that, "Wealthy beachfront property owners, however, led by former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, rebelled. They lobbied the Legislature into passing House Bill 631, making it easy for beachfront owners to employ the courts to block the beach. Threatening signs, fences and security guards have been employed to block public beach use."
My “leadership” was limited to sending one email to a state senator’s public website to thank her for taking the time to understand that HB 631 didn’t change ownership of one inch of beach.
Public beaches were and still are public. Beaches deeded as privately owned can’t be confiscated by the government by administrative act. The county must comply with the constitutional protection for private property. If a government wishes to take someone’s property, it must do so through the judicial branch. A legislative body such as the county commissioners can’t conduct a judicial function. It’s a simple separation of powers issue.
Walton County is now seeking to take property it once sold and deeded over to private developments and individuals, using an Old English “customary use” doctrine. Most of us thought our own Constitution — specifically the Fourth and Fifth Amendments — took precedence over some English custom, but today’s new socialists believe if they want it, just get government to take it and pay the owners nothing.
Walton County has already spent north of $1 million on high-octane lawyers suing their own taxpayers, who are now forced to hire attorneys to defend themselves and their property. In other words, beachfront owners are paying both sides of the lawsuit.
Those who demand “customary use” aren’t prohibited from seeking it, but they can’t just obtain it by having politicians do it. They must prove in court that their desire for someone else’s land is more legitimate than the actual deed held by property owners.
No one is “prohibited” from using public beaches, and there are miles of them in Walton County. Most beachfront owners don’t run people off their property, anyway. I haven’t, and despite the lies told, I’ve not placed signs prohibiting people from responsible use of my property.
Had Mr. Lotane done his homework, he would have learned that when Walton County wanted to “re-nourish” the beaches, including those on private property, over 93% of us said “No, we do not want the county to re-nourish beach on private land. That is a homeowner’s responsibility — not the taxpayers.'”
Sadly, the class warfare language of “wealthy people” misses the point. It’s not about wealth. It’s about the law, stuff most of us learned in 9th grade civics.
Beach Lover
I typically vote conservative, although not always.
At one time, I was a big Mike Huckabee fan.
No longer! Someone moves here from out of town, disrupts what has been the beach life significantly and really thinks anyone believes his total involvement with this mess was one email. Nice try.
At one time, I was a big Mike Huckabee fan.
No longer! Someone moves here from out of town, disrupts what has been the beach life significantly and really thinks anyone believes his total involvement with this mess was one email. Nice try.
SoWal Guide
Nice try Mikey.
Beach Fanatic
"Had Mr. Lotane done his homework, he would have learned that when Walton County wanted to “re-nourish” the beaches, including those on private property, over 93% of us said “No, we do not want the county to re-nourish beach on private land. That is a homeowner’s responsibility — not the taxpayers.'”
Had Mr. Huckabees fans had done their homework they would have learned that his house wasnt even built when that case went to court.
Had Mr. Huckabees fans had done their homework they would have learned that his house wasnt even built when that case went to court.
Beach Lover
Nice try Mikey.
Are you saying Huckabee is the root cause of the significant disruption of beach life? What does that mean?
Was he responsible for the Edgewater Court case in 2008 which confirmed private property ownership (yet again - check the Walton Clerk of Court Web Site and read the documents). Was he responsible for every single BCC Beach Ordinance (prior to 2016) which recognized Private Property? The 2016 BCC Ordinance was the FIRST TIME in Walton County History that an ordinance was passed that would have forced occupation of private property against the will of the property owner. The BCC cannot remove State of Florida Property Rights without judicial approval.
How much property has the BCC purchased in the last 10 years? Surely there is more than a couple of lots across from Stinky’s? How many public bathrooms have been added in the last 10 years? How many public parking places have been added in the last 10 years? And now for the BONUS QUESTION, how many more tourists do we have each year compared to 10 years ago.
That is your answer. Nothing to do with Huckabee. Nothing to do with BPO’s private property, which has been private since anyone in Walton County has been alive. It is above overcrowding and the BCC not buying enough property to make more public beaches.
Everyone can still swim, walk, take pictures, or surf the entire 26 miles of Walton county coastline. That has not changed or been disrupted. The only thing that is changed is that there is no more room on public beaches. That is a result of a massive increase of tourists and nothing to do with private property owners or Mike Huckabee.
Nice try Teressa.
Beach Lover
I typically vote conservative, although not always.
At one time, I was a big Mike Huckabee fan.
No longer! Someone moves here from out of town, disrupts what has been the beach life significantly and really thinks anyone believes his total involvement with this mess was one email. Nice try.
Explain how Mr. Huckabee, with his noted actions, disrupts the beach life significantly?
Mr. Huckabee did attend a "town meeting" and tried to encourage everyone to find a middle ground. No one on the CU sided had any interest in that notion. But like many progressives these days, the only ground that matters to them is where they stand - with no impetus to move an inch.
SoWal Guide
Are you saying Huckabee is the root cause of the significant disruption of beach life? What does that mean?
Was he responsible for the Edgewater Court case in 2008 which confirmed private property ownership (yet again - check the Walton Clerk of Court Web Site and read the documents). Was he responsible for every single BCC Beach Ordinance (prior to 2016) which recognized Private Property? The 2016 BCC Ordinance was the FIRST TIME in Walton County History that an ordinance was passed that would have forced occupation of private property against the will of the property owner. The BCC cannot remove State of Florida Property Rights without judicial approval.
How much property has the BCC purchased in the last 10 years? Surely there is more than a couple of lots across from Stinky’s? How many public bathrooms have been added in the last 10 years? How many public parking places have been added in the last 10 years? And now for the BONUS QUESTION, how many more tourists do we have each year compared to 10 years ago.
That is your answer. Nothing to do with Huckabee. Nothing to do with BPO’s private property, which has been private since anyone in Walton County has been alive. It is above overcrowding and the BCC not buying enough property to make more public beaches.
Everyone can still swim, walk, take pictures, or surf the entire 26 miles of Walton county coastline. That has not changed or been disrupted. The only thing that is changed is that there is no more room on public beaches. That is a result of a massive increase of tourists and nothing to do with private property owners or Mike Huckabee.
Nice try Teressa.
Nope. I'm not saying any of this. These are your words. Don't put words in my mouth or anyone else's. We can read, we are an informed community, and we know what is happening here in our own beach town.
Beach Lover
Nope. I'm not saying any of this.
So are you saying the root cause may not be Mike Huckabee?
Do you think the root cause might be a 10-fold increase in tourists in the last decade, now at the 4 million number? What happens as that number grows larger and tourists are bussed in and not even paying bed tax in Walton County?
There has not been anyone “kicked off the beach” for swimming, fishing, walking the entire coastline, building sandcastles, or taking family pictures.
The issue has been people putting chairs and umbrellas on private property against the will of the property owner because of overcrowding on Public Beaches due to the exponential increase of tourists. As a result of the tourist increase, the BCC (as of 2016) wants to take absolute and full control of all property from the dune line to the water line, independent of who has a legal deed. Before 2016, if someone was on private property without permission of the property owner (possibly by mistake) and were asked to leave, they left. That has been the Ancient Customary Use in Walton County. There has NEVER been forced occupation of unlimited people and unlimited equipment on Private Property against the will of the Property owner, and in the OPINION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA there WILL NOT BE WITHOUT JUDICIAL APPROVAL.
So help me out. The county web site lists 9 Regional or County Public Beaches with parking and restroom, 8 of which are on 30A. When was each of them opened?
1. Miramar Beach Regional Beach Access – (when did this open?)
2. Dune Allen Regional Beach Access – (open 2019)
3. Fort Panic Regional Beach Access – (when did this open?)
4. Ed Walline Regional Beach Access – (when did this open?)
5. Gulfview Heights Regional Beach Access – (when did this open?)
6. Blue Mountain Regional Beach Access – (when did this open?)
7. Van Ness Butler Jr. Regional Beach Access – (when did this open?)
8. Santa Clara Regional Beach Access – (when did this open?)
9. Inlet Beach Regional Access – (when did this open?)
Beach Fanatic
So are you saying the root cause may not be Mike Huckabee?You are pissing in the wind on a public forum for beach lovers. Do you enjoy being covered in piss?
Do you think the root cause might be a 10-fold increase in tourists in the last decade, now at the 4 million number? What happens as that number grows larger and tourists are bussed in and not even paying bed tax in Walton County?
There has not been anyone “kicked off the beach” for swimming, fishing, walking the entire coastline, building sandcastles, or taking family pictures.
The issue has been people putting chairs and umbrellas on private property against the will of the property owner because of overcrowding on Public Beaches due to the exponential increase of tourists. As a result of the tourist increase, the BCC (as of 2016) wants to take absolute and full control of all property from the dune line to the water line, independent of who has a legal deed. Before 2016, if someone was on private property without permission of the property owner (possibly by mistake) and were asked to leave, they left. That has been the Ancient Customary Use in Walton County. There has NEVER been forced occupation of unlimited people and unlimited equipment on Private Property against the will of the Property owner, and in the OPINION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA there WILL NOT BE WITHOUT JUDICIAL APPROVAL.
So help me out. The county web site lists 9 Regional or County Public Beaches with parking and restroom, 8 of which are on 30A. When was each of them opened?
1. Miramar Beach Regional Beach Access – (when did this open?)
2. Dune Allen Regional Beach Access – (open 2019)
3. Fort Panic Regional Beach Access – (when did this open?)
4. Ed Walline Regional Beach Access – (when did this open?)
5. Gulfview Heights Regional Beach Access – (when did this open?)
6. Blue Mountain Regional Beach Access – (when did this open?)
7. Van Ness Butler Jr. Regional Beach Access – (when did this open?)
8. Santa Clara Regional Beach Access – (when did this open?)
9. Inlet Beach Regional Access – (when did this open?)
Beach Lover
pissing in the wind
We should add the number of parking spaces and the number of restrooms available at each of the 9 public beaches. How many restrooms are needed for 4 million tourists a year so they are not doing as you suggest?
Beach Fanatic
We should add the number of parking spaces and the number of restrooms available at each of the 9 public beaches. How many restrooms are needed for 4 million tourists a year so they are not doing as you suggest?2.9 Million?
Beach Fanatic
Beach Lover
So are you saying the root cause may not be Mike Huckabee?
Do you think the root cause might be a 10-fold increase in tourists in the last decade, now at the 4 million number? What happens as that number grows larger and tourists are bussed in and not even paying bed tax in Walton County?
There has not been anyone “kicked off the beach” for swimming, fishing, walking the entire coastline, building sandcastles, or taking family pictures.
The issue has been people putting chairs and umbrellas on private property against the will of the property owner because of overcrowding on Public Beaches due to the exponential increase of tourists. As a result of the tourist increase, the BCC (as of 2016) wants to take absolute and full control of all property from the dune line to the water line, independent of who has a legal deed. Before 2016, if someone was on private property without permission of the property owner (possibly by mistake) and were asked to leave, they left. That has been the Ancient Customary Use in Walton County. There has NEVER been forced occupation of unlimited people and unlimited equipment on Private Property against the will of the Property owner, and in the OPINION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA there WILL NOT BE WITHOUT JUDICIAL APPROVAL.
So help me out. The county web site lists 9 Regional or County Public Beaches with parking and restroom, 8 of which are on 30A. When was each of them opened?
1. Miramar Beach Regional Beach Access – (when did this open?)
2. Dune Allen Regional Beach Access – (open 2019)
3. Fort Panic Regional Beach Access – (when did this open?)
4. Ed Walline Regional Beach Access – (when did this open?)
5. Gulfview Heights Regional Beach Access – (when did this open?)
6. Blue Mountain Regional Beach Access – (when did this open?)
7. Van Ness Butler Jr. Regional Beach Access – (when did this open?)
8. Santa Clara Regional Beach Access – (when did this open?)
9. Inlet Beach Regional Access – (when did this open?)
The question is why are some gulf front property lines to the MHWL and some are to the toe of the dune?
Beach Fanatic
The question is why are some gulf front property lines to the MHWL and some are to the toe of the dune?The question is why do any deeds include the beach? A mistake that should never have happened and now needs to be corrected. As stated on here by a former government employee, the idea was to keep anyone from building anything on the beach behind a beachfront house and block access or the view. We have state regs for that. If need be we can make it local ordinance also.
If lawyers won't allow deeds to be changed then we need to change the rules and allow public access on every beach in Florida. Any beachfront owner opposed is costing us money and grief and they should stand down. I think most of them are just doing what their lawyers tell them to do which of course keeps the money flowing to lawyers. Ever notice most lawmakers are lawyers? Lawmakers keep their buddies and cousins in business all day every day.
Beach FanaticAuthor
Above = Anarchists
If the Constitution doesn’t suit you, just simply ignore it.
Exactly what our BCC is doing right at this moment....supporting HB6063 so they can reinstate CU and seize private property rights WITHOUT DUE PROCESS.
DUE PROCESS is not an opinion, it is SUPREME LAW guaranteed by the highest level legal document of out great country.
It’s bad enough that.private property owners are having to spend millions of dollars defending their property, but now, CU ACTIVISTS want to also deprive private property owners DUE PROCESS - their ability to defend their private property BEFORE it is seized (not after).
If one owns private property, one’s eyes should be wide open.
What are they afraid of? Dumb question. Answer for the slow:They’re afraid private property owner’s rights will prevail (as I have predicted on SoWal a few times). And afraid that “they” might miss out on a buck or two.
If the Constitution doesn’t suit you, just simply ignore it.
Exactly what our BCC is doing right at this moment....supporting HB6063 so they can reinstate CU and seize private property rights WITHOUT DUE PROCESS.
DUE PROCESS is not an opinion, it is SUPREME LAW guaranteed by the highest level legal document of out great country.
It’s bad enough that.private property owners are having to spend millions of dollars defending their property, but now, CU ACTIVISTS want to also deprive private property owners DUE PROCESS - their ability to defend their private property BEFORE it is seized (not after).
If one owns private property, one’s eyes should be wide open.
What are they afraid of? Dumb question. Answer for the slow:They’re afraid private property owner’s rights will prevail (as I have predicted on SoWal a few times). And afraid that “they” might miss out on a buck or two.
Beach Fanatic
If the Constitution doesn’t suit you, just simply ignore it.It's a BRAND NEW AMERICA!!! It's how we roll.
SoWal Insider
Lie, cheat, and steal, just like our commander in chief!! Laws don’t seem to mean much anymore.
Beach Lover
The question is why do any deeds include the beach? A mistake that should never have happened and now needs to be corrected. As stated on here by a former government employee, the idea was to keep anyone from building anything on the beach behind a beachfront house and block access or the view. We have state regs for that. If need be we can make it local ordinance also.
If lawyers won't allow deeds to be changed then we need to change the rules and allow public access on every beach in Florida. Any beachfront owner opposed is costing us money and grief and they should stand down. I think most of them are just doing what their lawyers tell them to do which of course keeps the money flowing to lawyers. Ever notice most lawmakers are lawyers? Lawmakers keep their buddies and cousins in business all day every day.
Please explain how BFO’s are costing you and others money?
By legally defending their property rights PROVIDED BY WALTON COUNTY.?!
Beach Fanatic
Please explain how BFO’s are costing you and others money?I doubt you are oblivious to the the obvious lawyer fees, you are taking time of county employees like code enforcement and sheriff, diverting attention from business we should be doing, wasting time and money. If you are concerned about property rights then there are betterways to spend your time. You have no rights to destroy dunes. It is against humanity's interest and stains your soul. Sea level rise and hurricanes are mother nature's revenge and you will suffer!
By legally defending their property rights PROVIDED BY WALTON COUNTY.?!
Beach Lover
I doubt you are oblivious to the the obvious lawyer fees, you are taking time of county employees like code enforcement and sheriff, diverting attention from business we should be doing, wasting time and money. If you are concerned about property rights then there are betterways to spend your time. You have no rights to destroy dunes. It is against humanity's interest and stains your soul. Sea level rise and hurricanes are mother nature's revenge and you will suffer!
FACTS:
- The County, "influenced" by SJW locals for the most part, initiated the legal action that is taking place. So I take it you are OK with the County spending millions of taxpayer monies on this suit that may take years to end. I am not. The BFO's are funding the legal fees on both sides.
- There was NO EFFORT made by the WCC to meet, negotiate, discuss, etc.. with BFO's to reach a common ground or solution to their perception of a problem. Mr. Huckabee offered an option for discussion that was NEVER considered by the WCC. Why?
- You must not have a problem with 50% of Public Beach areas "reserved" for vendors to operate. If so, let the WCC know that. There really is very little issue of beach sand availability for public use through the year. It is THE FRONT ROW AVAILABILITY that leads to people moving on to private property areas.
- I personally am always aware and respectful of EVERYONE'S property rights. Are you? And I agree with you that there are better ways to spend my time than fighting for my own personal property. And I will as soon as this ridiculousness is over.
- Regarding my beachfront property, at my cost, fencing and native grasses have been in place and nourished by local professionals. And I will continue to do all in my power to keep the dunes in great shape. As do all the other BFO's I know.
- As I have noted here previously, members of both the TDC and WCC have stated to me there is a "bigger problem with parking than beach availability". True statement.
- And why isn't there more promotion of the MILES of public beach available? Plenty of parking, bathroom access, ease of entry, etc.....
- Progressives are typically not interested, nor respectful, of facts. They rather drive their wants / needs on emotional issues that are for "the common man". They typically do not have any interest in a workable solution to an issue and will fan the flames of public sentiment to try and reach their goal - "just give me what I want and all is fine". Does it bother you, or any CU supporter, that the WCC made no effort to "work" with the BFO's on this issue? What is in it for the WCC's?
- I am open to a workable solution - no question. And I will also defend my property rights every day when others try to take away what is legally mine.
Throughout this whole issue, what is discussed on this forum and in the 30A area, I have yet to hear a CU supporter come up with ACTUAL FACTS to support their position. It is ALWAYS their opinion.
Maybe today is a good day for that to start.
Beach Fanatic
FACTS:Regardless of lawyers and deeds and legal. Beachfront owners get more feces on them every time you post.
- The County, "influenced" by SJW locals for the most part, initiated the legal action that is taking place. So I take it you are OK with the County spending millions of taxpayer monies on this suit that may take years to end. I am not. The BFO's are funding the legal fees on both sides.
- There was NO EFFORT made by the WCC to meet, negotiate, discuss, etc.. with BFO's to reach a common ground or solution to their perception of a problem. Mr. Huckabee offered an option for discussion that was NEVER considered by the WCC. Why?
- You must not have a problem with 50% of Public Beach areas "reserved" for vendors to operate. If so, let the WCC know that. There really is very little issue of beach sand availability for public use through the year. It is THE FRONT ROW AVAILABILITY that leads to people moving on to private property areas.
- I personally am always aware and respectful of EVERYONE'S property rights. Are you? And I agree with you that there are better ways to spend my time than fighting for my own personal property. And I will as soon as this ridiculousness is over.
- Regarding my beachfront property, at my cost, fencing and native grasses have been in place and nourished by local professionals. And I will continue to do all in my power to keep the dunes in great shape. As do all the other BFO's I know.
- As I have noted here previously, members of both the TDC and WCC have stated to me there is a "bigger problem with parking than beach availability". True statement.
- And why isn't there more promotion of the MILES of public beach available? Plenty of parking, bathroom access, ease of entry, etc.....
- Progressives are typically not interested, nor respectful, of facts. They rather drive their wants / needs on emotional issues that are for "the common man". They typically do not have any interest in a workable solution to an issue and will fan the flames of public sentiment to try and reach their goal - "just give me what I want and all is fine". Does it bother you, or any CU supporter, that the WCC made no effort to "work" with the BFO's on this issue? What is in it for the WCC's?
- I am open to a workable solution - no question. And I will also defend my property rights every day when others try to take away what is legally mine.
Throughout this whole issue, what is discussed on this forum and in the 30A area, I have yet to hear a CU supporter come up with ACTUAL FACTS to support their position. It is ALWAYS their opinion.
Maybe today is a good day for that to start.
Keep digging you will be buried in sand up to your neck soon and the temperature is rising and the crabs will find you.
Beach Lover
Regardless of lawyers and deeds and legal. Beachfront owners get more feces on them every time you post.
Keep digging you will be buried in sand up to your neck soon and the temperature is rising and the crabs will find you.
Very classy.
Thanks for helping to prove my points.
Beach FanaticAuthor
Remember, @SUP View, there are not prerequisites for posting on this forum. And it sometimes really shows. Good post, BTW.
Seems like us BPOs are dropping like files on this forum. Oh well, we’ll still have our DAY(s) in court much to the FEAR of FBFA and their supporters. And I still believe the outcome will be the same regardless of the CU zealots’ actions.
There’s not a chance in hell that you, I or any other private property owner defending their property against this RIDICULOUS customary use attempt at property theft will convince any CU supporter that maybe they are supporting an unjust cause, especially considering they want something for nothing.
Maybe that’s why a socialist candidate is surprising a lot of us. But I digress.
My main concern is the slander perpetuated by some extremists who obviously doesn’t give a flying freak what many good, upstanding and respected citizens feel about their methods, motivations and ultimately them. And basically that’s why I started this thread. And I’m not disappointed with the replies of the usual suspects this far.
I guess FBFA will try to shame the super majority of the Senate and Representatives in Tallahassee into changing their minds and allow the Walton BCC to have their way as they see fit....Constitution be damned (due process). Gosh I hope they see the charade for what it is...a brighter spotlight on those who greatly desire it.
Seems like us BPOs are dropping like files on this forum. Oh well, we’ll still have our DAY(s) in court much to the FEAR of FBFA and their supporters. And I still believe the outcome will be the same regardless of the CU zealots’ actions.
There’s not a chance in hell that you, I or any other private property owner defending their property against this RIDICULOUS customary use attempt at property theft will convince any CU supporter that maybe they are supporting an unjust cause, especially considering they want something for nothing.
Maybe that’s why a socialist candidate is surprising a lot of us. But I digress.
My main concern is the slander perpetuated by some extremists who obviously doesn’t give a flying freak what many good, upstanding and respected citizens feel about their methods, motivations and ultimately them. And basically that’s why I started this thread. And I’m not disappointed with the replies of the usual suspects this far.
I guess FBFA will try to shame the super majority of the Senate and Representatives in Tallahassee into changing their minds and allow the Walton BCC to have their way as they see fit....Constitution be damned (due process). Gosh I hope they see the charade for what it is...a brighter spotlight on those who greatly desire it.
Beach Fanatic
Slander, progressives, socialists! Oh my!
Trolls gonna troll.
Trolls gonna troll.
Checking your forum account
Please wait while we verify your forum account.