Back to SoWal Lounge

I am becoming a disgruntled Obama supporter

Geo avatar
Beach Fanatic
12,421 views
On top of some of his decisions rubbing me wrong, I am very unhappy with how my guy Barry has seemingly pissed away an opportunity to shine in his response to the oil spill. The way I feel right this second, I can't say I would vote for him in 2012. So riddle me this-

who do you believe could be running against hIm that is worth considering and why?

Note: I don't consider myself a democrat or a republican so no one is off limits due to party affiliation or lack thereof.

Replies

303
30ashopper avatar
SoWal Insider
#2
Scott Brown. Because he drives a truck.
LuciferSam avatar
Banned
#3
On top of some of his decisions rubbing me wrong, I am very unhappy with how my guy Barry has seemingly pissed away an opportunity to shine in his response to the oil spill. The way I feel right this second, I can't say I would vote for him in 2012. So riddle me this-

who do you believe could be running against hIm that is worth considering and why?

Note: I don't consider myself a democrat or a republican so no one is off limits due to party affiliation or lack thereof.

Oh c'mon woofie burger. I'm right here for ya! Dont' be so down.;-)
Lake View Too avatar
SoWal Insider
#4
Honestly, I'm feeling the same way, but then I realize the scope of the problems he faces every day. Some problems simply don't have answers. The oil spill is one of those. Afghan is one of those. The economy is one of those. And I don't mean, they don't have good answers. I mean they don't have answers, period. They are things we will have to live with. To get to your question, I don't see anyone on either side nearly as capable as he.
Beach Fanatic
#5
On top of some of his decisions rubbing me wrong, I am very unhappy with how my guy Barry has seemingly pissed away an opportunity to shine in his response to the oil spill. The way I feel right this second, I can't say I would vote for him in 2012. So riddle me this-

who do you believe could be running against hIm that is worth considering and why?

Note: I don't consider myself a democrat or a republican so no one is off limits due to party affiliation or lack thereof.

I admire your honesty Geo. Leaders in both parties continue to disappoint me on a daily basis. I'm looking for a strong fiscal conservative - a la Chris Christie, a strong leader in times of crisis - a la Rudy Guiliani, and someone who is savvy in foreign affairs - a la Newt Gingrich. I don't care if they are republican or democrat, black, white or purple.

I don't know who might be running yet but the one who possesses the majority of the above qualities will get my vote.
Em avatar
Beach Fanatic
#6
Do you think Bill Clinton would run again? I heard him talking about the four priorities that SHOULD be happening with the government and this oil leak. He stated that plugging the hole should be number one, and further down at number four should be finding those responsible and punishment. He was basically saying that Pres. Obama has it all backwards.

Geo, I recently reflected back to those commercials that he or Hillary ran (or maybe both of them ran) with the red phone ringing at 2am, and I cannot help but to think that Pres Obama must have had his ear plugs in when that red phone was ringing with this leak. The red phone has been ringing for 72 days now.

His stump speech was really good, and people not liking Bush and scared to death of Palin, is what got Obama elected. On a side note, at least pretty boy John Edwards wasn't the Dem nominee.

I am far from pleased with Obama as President, but I would also likely be just happy with McCain.

And where has Biden been hiding? I hope he doesn't kill the internet just yet.

Sadly, I haven't been disappointed by our Presidents for a while. Being disappointed implies that I had good expectations from them to start.
Lynnie avatar
SoWal Insider
#7
At the risk of being attacked, I'd like to express that every President has had a unique set of issues on his plate. This President is no different and I, too, am extremely unhappy and quite baffled at how little has been done with this mess in the Gulf.

In my experience, when action is not being taken, it has eventually surfaced that there was an underlying issue. I am not saying that's the case with the Gulf, but.........just sayin'.
Yzarctoo avatar
Beach Fanatic
#8
Honestly, I'm feeling the same way, but then I realize the scope of the problems he faces every day. Some problems simply don't have answers.
I don't see anyone on either side nearly as capable as he.

I never considered Obama capable, he came into office without leadership experience...he came in with a personal agenda, he came in with a Chicago "Thug" type way of how to get things done. He surrounded himself with folks who had the same agenda...an agenda to change America....he is too thin skinned... he wants, and tries to shut down those that don't agree with him...he scares the hE!! out of me. To not be concerned about spies, to not take terrorist seriously, to bad mouth America while traveling in other countries, to lie to the American people about taxes...the list of his faults can go on and on.

As to who should we look to for 2012...I am not sure if anyone out there can fix the mess that will have occurred by then...our debt will be impossible to pay off, our health care will be in ruins, we will have lost so many jobs, our country will be loaded with illegals, the list goes on and on. It is very sad to even think about. Crises need to be dealt with as they occur,,,you can't take a wait and let me think about it approach. We needed those skimmers in the gulf on day 2 of the spill. 70+ days later with our beautiful Gulf dotted with tar and oil, he might allow foreign help...he certainly didn't take lots of time thinking about signing bills most Americans didn't want and asking Congress to pass unread bills, did he ? As a retired person on a fixed income.. I hate to see what 2012 will bring...I can't see a reason for anyone to want to run for office, other than for the desire to fly all over in the Presidental plane...which Obama seems to enjoy doing among his other duties(?)
AlphaCrab avatar
Beach Fanatic
#9
Honestly, I'm feeling the same way, but then I realize the scope of the problems he faces every day. Some problems simply don't have answers. The oil spill is one of those. Afghan is one of those. The economy is one of those. And I don't mean, they don't have good answers. I mean they don't have answers, period. They are things we will have to live with. To get to your question, I don't see anyone on either side nearly as capable as he.


I am disgruntled too, mostly about not extracting us from Afganastan....I will be a supporter too, albeit disgruntled as well...I don't see anyone on the other side whose neck is free of the noose of the Tea Partiers or any of the many derrivates of that unorganized group.

I'd still rather listen to Obama than Rush Limbaugh.
Beach Fanatic
#10
Originally Posted by Lake View Too
Honestly, I'm feeling the same way, but then I realize the scope of the problems he faces every day. Some problems simply don't have answers.
I don't see anyone on either side nearly as capable as he.


How scary is that thought?! Personally, 2012 can't get here fast enough for me.....any potential candidate, from any political persuasion, will be an improvement. What we need is someone with insight, military/business experience, ability, dedication, humility, decisiveness, intestinal fortitude, forthrightness, empathy, worldliness, etc., etc., etc., over one with "book smarts" and ego. Figure the odds....
Banned
#11
Had the conservatives been as honest in their feelings as liberals are being we wouldn't have had to suffer through the continuing damage of GW's second term.
Beach Fanatic
#12
Had the conservatives been as honest in their feelings as liberals are being we wouldn't have had to suffer through the continuing damage of GW's second term.

I think there is a lot of truth in this statement although there were many conservatives (myself included) who were not happy with the spending spree that Bush and the Republicans went on and were very vocal about it. I may be wrong but I think that the Tea Party movement is a direct result of disgruntled conservatives finally getting honest.
Geo avatar
Beach FanaticAuthor
#13
Here's my issue- as I said, I am unhappy with Obama but this does not mean by default that any opponent gets my vote. I do not feel like- "well next time I am voting Republican". This thinking is precisely what ails this country.

This wasn't supposed to be an Obama bashing thread or a thread to bash anyone really. I'm hoping to hear disection/analysis/commentary of prospective 2012 candidates.

I've sprinkled the thread with troll flakes so let's try to discuss without being inflammatory to people who might normally disagree politically.
Beach Fanatic
#14
Here's my issue- as I said, I am unhappy with Obama but this does not mean by default that any opponent gets my vote. I do not feel like- "well next time I am voting Republican". This thinking is precisely what ails this country.

This wasn't supposed to be an Obama bashing thread or a thread to bash anyone really. I'm hoping to hear disection/analysis/commentary of prospective 2012 candidates.

I've sprinkled the thread with troll flakes so let's try to discuss without being inflammatory to people who might normally disagree politically.

Geo - Mitch Daniels, Governor of Indiana, is somebody that I am very interested in.

Contemplating President Mitch Daniels | Politics & Media | SPLICETODAY.com
LuciferSam avatar
Banned
#15
Had the conservatives been as honest in their feelings as liberals are being we wouldn't have had to suffer through the continuing damage of GW's second term.

Yeah, I never understood the unwilligness of most Republicans to levy any criticism constructive or otherwise against Bush, at least not until the very end. The problem I see is that in 2012, Obama is going to be the Democratic nominee for sure. The Republicans may have some good people who I might consider voting for in the general election, but none of them stand a chance of being nominated. So the odds are I will end up voting for Obama again whether he shapes up or not.
Lynnie avatar
SoWal Insider
#16
Yeah, I never understood the unwilligness of most Republicans to levy any criticism constructive or otherwise against Bush, at least not until the very end. The problem I see is that in 2012, Obama is going to be the Democratic nominee for sure. The Republicans may have some good people who I might consider voting for in the general election, but none of them stand a chance of being nominated. So the odds are I will end up voting for Obama again whether he shapes up or not.

I've often pondered the ramifications of a sitting President NOT receiving the respective party's nomination for a second term. I think this would be more damaging to the party in the long run.......unfortunate, because I always liked Hilary Clinton and think she would make a Great President.

I know people, left and right, who levied criticism of Bush during his first term. :idontno:
Beach Fanatic
#17
This wasn't supposed to be an Obama bashing thread or a thread to bash anyone really. I'm hoping to hear disection/analysis/commentary of prospective 2012 candidates.


Mitt Romney- Of course, religion will play a large roll in the primaries but I feel like Romney would fare better in a general election than other "more religious" candidates (Palin, Huckabee). I would also worry about all his flip-flopping on issues that are very important to the Republican base. He also essentially designed the Obama healthcare bill, despite what he wants to tell you. I feel like he comes off as very knowledgeable and really knows what businesses need to create jobs. And I feel like he would do very well with independents in the general election.

Chris Christie- Strong fiscal conservative, powerful speaker, and I love that he is so adamant on sending teachers unions to hell. The problems I see with him are that he is unexperienced and he acknowledges that he is. Every candidate says they're not going to run for president right now, but he seems more sincere when he says he doesn't think he is ready and he doesn't want the job. He kind of seems like someone who wants to deal more with "governor" issues (education, small budgets) than deal with foreign issues all day.

Mike Huckabee- Probably the strongest social conservative in the race. Not afraid of the tea party, like other mainstream Republicans, and will get tea party support. His PAC has maybe been the most active thus far and that will get him a lot of political support come primary time. I think it turns a lot of people off when he makes such a big deal about religion in his speeches. I think his "fair tax" ideas could grow on people.

Sarah Palin- I love her as a political puppet to further the Republicans ideas and get Republicans elected. But as a candidate, I worry she will make the same mistakes she made in 2008. When she was a vice president she only had to be in the spotlight as a candidate for a few months and she only had one debate. But as a primary candidate it will be almost two years and a lot of debates, if she wants to be a serious candidate she better polish up on her knowledge of the issues.

Rick Perry- I know it may sound crazy, but I think he is just a better version of Palin. For a Republican, he is popular with Latinos and disliked by many for his somewhat moderate stance on immigration.I don't know if people outside of Texas appreciate how strong he is politically, and manages to just dominate opponents who are more knowledgeable and experienced than him (Kay Bailey Hutchinson). Could have a problem, like most governors, dealing with national issues. Many of his strong Texas supporters have said they don't think they would vote for him in a presidential race.

Ron Paul- I don't see it happening. If anyone has an argument for him, I would be happy to hear what it is. I just don't think he comes off very well politically.


Other candidates I think have a good shot are Mitch Daniels, Rubio, Jindal
It's still really far out and there could still be candidates we haven't heard of that end up becoming a factor.

Edited

Yzarctoo avatar
Beach Fanatic
#18
Had the conservatives been as honest in their feelings as liberals are being we wouldn't have had to suffer through the continuing damage of GW's second term.

And Kerry would have....done what?
LuciferSam avatar
Banned
#19
And Kerry would have....done what?

He certainly couldn't have done worse than Bush.
sarawind avatar
Beach Fanatic
#20
This wasn't supposed to be an Obama bashing thread or a thread to bash anyone really. I'm hoping to hear disection/analysis/commentary of prospective 2012 candidates.


Tim Pawlenty of Minnesota is interesting. His bio:

TIM PAWLENTY is regarded as one of the nation's most innovative, energetic, reform-minded and accomplished governors. Now serving his second term as the 39th governor of Minnesota, Governor Pawlenty has brought increased accountability to state government, held the line on taxes, improved K-12 education standards and made Minnesota a leader in energy reform.

As Governor, he has balanced Minnesota's budget three times without raising taxes, despite facing record budget deficits. Governor Pawlenty's most notable accomplishments include proposing and signing into law significant new benefits for veterans and members of the military; enacting a property tax cap, eliminating the marriage penalty and cutting taxes; toughening the state's education standards; reforming the way teachers are paid through a nation-leading performance pay plan; instituting free-market health care reforms that increase accountability and provide tax credits to encourage the use of health savings accounts; and implementing a plan to Americanize our energy sources by generating 25% of the state's electricity from renewable sources by 2025.

Under Governor Pawlenty's leadership, Minnesota leads the nation in a variety of measures. Minnesota ranks first among states in Fortune 500 companies per capita, first in overall quality of life, first in homeownership, first in percentage of residents with a high school diploma, and first in residents over 25 with a bachelors degree. Minnesota has the highest average ACT scores in the nation and is among the "Healthiest States in America."

Pawlenty grew up in South St. Paul, Minnesota. The only child in his family to graduate from college, he attended the University of Minnesota and practiced law in the private sector. His public service career includes serving as a criminal prosecutor, Eagan City Councilmember, and ten-year member of the Minnesota House of Representatives, including four years as House Majority Leader. Pawlenty served as Chair of the National Governors Association and on the National Infrastructure Advisory Council, the Achieve Inc. Board of Directors and the James B. Hunt Jr. Institute Board of Directors. He is Chair of the Education Commission of the States and former Chair of the Midwestern Governors Association.

Pawlenty and his wife, Mary have two daughters.

About Pawlenty

Edited

Lynnie avatar
SoWal Insider
#21
Mitt Romney- Of course, religion will play a large roll in the primaries but I feel like Romney would fare better in a general election than other "more religious" candidates (Palin, Huckabee). I would also worry about all his flip-flopping on issues that are very important to the Republican base. He also essentially designed the Obama healthcare bill, despite what he wants to tell you. I feel like he comes off as very knowledgeable and really knows what businesses need to create jobs. And I feel like he would do very well with independents in the general election.

Chris Christie- Strong fiscal conservative, powerful speaker, and I love that he is so adamant on sending teachers unions to hell. The problems I see with him are that he is unexperienced and he acknowledges that he is. Every candidate says they're not going to run for president right now, but he seems more sincere when he says he doesn't think he is ready and he doesn't want the job. He kind of seems like someone who wants to deal more with "governor" issues (education, small budgets) than deal with foreign issues all day.

Mike Huckabee- Probably the strongest social conservative in the race. Not afraid of the tea party, like other mainstream Republicans, and will get tea party support. His PAC has maybe been the most active thus far and that will get him a lot of political support come primary time. I think it turns a lot of people off when he makes such a big deal about religion in his speeches. I think his "fair tax" ideas could grow on people.

Sarah Palin- I love her as a political puppet to further the Republicans ideas and get Republicans elected. But as a candidate, I worry she will make the same mistakes she made in 2008. When she was a vice president she only had to be in the spotlight as a candidate for a few months and she only had one debate. But as a primary candidate it will be almost two years and a lot of debates, if she wants to be a serious candidate she better polish up on her knowledge of the issues.

Rick Perry- I know it may sound crazy, but I think he is just a better version of Palin. For a Republican, he is popular with Latinos and disliked by many for his somewhat moderate stance on immigration.I don't know if people outside of Texas appreciate how strong he is politically, and manages to just dominate opponents who are more knowledgeable and experienced than him (Kay Bailey Hutchinson). Could have a problem, like most governors, dealing with national issues. Many of his strong Texas supporters have said they don't think they would vote for him in a presidential race.

Ron Paul- I don't see it happening. If anyone has an argument for him, I would be happy to hear what it is. I just don't think he comes off very well politically.


Other candidates I think have a good shot are Mitch Daniels, Rubio, Jindal
It's still really far out and there could still be candidates we haven't heard of that end up becoming a factor.


Decent Roster, except for Palin. In 2008, however, I had issues with Romney and Huckabee, thinking I preferred a Separation of Church and State concept. But, Romney has grown on me since then. Huckabee is too far right, I think. As far as Church and State, I realized that I prefer someone with a strong faith and that's as far as I will take it. Jindal is someone to look at.

Sam Nunn, hands down, a winner......he is everything Happy2beme suggests and a PROVEN Conservative Democrat, who could make tremendous progress inclusive of healing the divisiveness of this Nation. I doubt he would do it, though.
Lynnie avatar
SoWal Insider
#22
He certainly couldn't have done worse than Bush.

Wishy-Washy Kerry? Done worse than Bush? I'd give it a tie, if not much worse. :wave:
sarawind avatar
Beach Fanatic
#23
The French-looking, John Kerry, who by the way, served in Vietnam is a member of the hate America first crowd. Bush is a good man who tried to extend every opportunity to democrats to work together and was rebuffed at every turn. He did things I did not care but he kept us safe and cared deeply for the USA. Can't ya'll get past this?

Chris Christie is another interesting possibility but don't think he wants to run for president. Bobby Jindal is a good man but probably needs more experience. I like Sarah Palin for many reasons. The fact the liberal media can't stand her is a resume enhancement.
Gidget avatar
Beach Fanatic
#24
OMG Geo, this thread is turning into a:trainwreck:IMHO

Not sure it is what you had in mind when you started it. Some of the suggestions for POTUS blow my mind.

Here's an article worth reading - I think.

Obama and the BP oil spill : The New Yorker

Edited

futurebeachbum avatar
Beach Fanatic
#25
At the risk of being attacked, I'd like to express that every President has had a unique set of issues on his plate. This President is no different and I, too, am extremely unhappy and quite baffled at how little has been done with this mess in the Gulf.

In my experience, when action is not being taken, it has eventually surfaced that there was an underlying issue. I am not saying that's the case with the Gulf, but.........just sayin'.

Here's my theory.

The Administration is committed to Cap&Trade or Carbon Taxing and has had little to no traction on the topic. If they let the oil spill get bad enough and they can use that disaster to convince (generally uninformed and stupid) public to go along with it. Why else would they wait 57 days before verbally addressing it and forever before actually taking any useful action.

To quote Rahm Emanuel "Never let a crisis to go to waste."
30A Skunkape avatar
Skunky
#26
Mitt Romney- Of course, religion will play a large roll in the primaries but I feel like Romney would fare better in a general election than other "more religious" candidates (Palin, Huckabee). I would also worry about all his flip-flopping on issues that are very important to the Republican base. He also essentially designed the Obama healthcare bill, despite what he wants to tell you. I feel like he comes off as very knowledgeable and really knows what businesses need to create jobs. And I feel like he would do very well with independents in the general election.

Chris Christie- Strong fiscal conservative, powerful speaker, and I love that he is so adamant on sending teachers unions to hell. The problems I see with him are that he is unexperienced and he acknowledges that he is. Every candidate says they're not going to run for president right now, but he seems more sincere when he says he doesn't think he is ready and he doesn't want the job. He kind of seems like someone who wants to deal more with "governor" issues (education, small budgets) than deal with foreign issues all day.

Mike Huckabee- Probably the strongest social conservative in the race. Not afraid of the tea party, like other mainstream Republicans, and will get tea party support. His PAC has maybe been the most active thus far and that will get him a lot of political support come primary time. I think it turns a lot of people off when he makes such a big deal about religion in his speeches. I think his "fair tax" ideas could grow on people.

Sarah Palin- I love her as a political puppet to further the Republicans ideas and get Republicans elected. But as a candidate, I worry she will make the same mistakes she made in 2008. When she was a vice president she only had to be in the spotlight as a candidate for a few months and she only had one debate. But as a primary candidate it will be almost two years and a lot of debates, if she wants to be a serious candidate she better polish up on her knowledge of the issues.

Rick Perry- I know it may sound crazy, but I think he is just a better version of Palin. For a Republican, he is popular with Latinos and disliked by many for his somewhat moderate stance on immigration.I don't know if people outside of Texas appreciate how strong he is politically, and manages to just dominate opponents who are more knowledgeable and experienced than him (Kay Bailey Hutchinson). Could have a problem, like most governors, dealing with national issues. Many of his strong Texas supporters have said they don't think they would vote for him in a presidential race.

Ron Paul- I don't see it happening. If anyone has an argument for him, I would be happy to hear what it is. I just don't think he comes off very well politically.


Other candidates I think have a good shot are Mitch Daniels, Rubio, Jindal
It's still really far out and there could still be candidates we haven't heard of that end up becoming a factor.

Here is a piece I heard on NPR the other day on Bobby Jindal. And no, I'm not endorsing him, just pointing out that he is playing his cards right at this time. The piece fails to mention that he has been furiously raising money all over the country. One wonders what might have happened had McCain chosen Jindal for VP instead of Palin. Oil Spill Crisis Puts Jindal Back On Center Stage : NPR

Checking your forum account

Please wait while we verify your forum account.