No tax break for you! And the House heads home...

Boehner surprise: Dems barely get votes to adjourn after floor speech - The Hill's Blog Briefing Room

"House Democrats on Wednesday barely won a 210-209 vote to adjourn the House without extending the Bush tax cuts..."

It looks like the House has no more pesky time constraints (like work) ahead of it. We are looking at 30+ days of full on crazy!

.....uh,just another example of why this democrat cotrolled congress has the lowest approval numbers of all time.....November cannot come fast enough.

Which do you want more, tax cuts (that were dumb to start with) or a reduction in the deficit?

Keep dreaming that increased taxes will go toward debt. What a joke! You must think the stimulus worked.

Which do you want more, tax cuts (that were dumb to start with) or a reduction in the deficit?

I want both.

Keep dreaming that increased taxes will go toward debt. What a joke! You must think the stimulus worked.

Official and independent budget estimates show that letting tax rates spring back to pre-Bush levels for all taxpayers would bring the country within striking distance of meeting President Obama's goal of balancing the budget, excluding interest payments on the debt, by 2015.

But for all the election-year hand-wringing about deficits, no one in Washington is talking about letting the tax cuts lapse on schedule in January. Instead, Senate Republicans have offered a measure that would extend all the cuts, adding nearly $4 trillion to the debt over the next decade. This week, Senate Democrats say they plan to unveil a bill that would preserve most of the cuts for most Americans. That would add nearly $2 trillion to deficits by 2020.

washingtonpost.com

The problem isn't the income it's the spending. You can actually make more money by taxing less. It works. Our President just wasted a trillion dollars and now you're concerned about the deficit? Really?

I say tax those that make over $250,000 per year at the same level as in the 1990's under Clinton--rich folk don't create JOBS with their glutony....they only create jobs for the Portuguese and Dutch, since yacht building is now outsourced overseas.

I say tax those that make over $250,000 per year at the same level as in the 1990's under Clinton--rich folk don't create JOBS with their glutony....they only create jobs for the Portuguese and Dutch, since yacht building is now outsourced overseas.

I think we should increase taxes for those who make less than $250,000 a year. The revenue generated would be substantial compared to your proposal. Why tax the top 5% when you can tax the bottom 95%? They'll get it all back in federal services anyway.

Sales Tax
School Tax
Liquor Tax
Luxury Tax
Excise Taxes
Property Tax
Cigarette Tax
Medicare Tax
Inventory Tax
Real Estate Tax
Well Permit Tax
Fuel Permit Tax
Inheritance Tax
Road Usage Tax
CDL license Tax
Dog License Tax
State Income Tax
Food License Tax
Vehicle Sales Tax
Gross Receipts Tax
Social Security Tax
Service Charge Tax
Fishing License Tax
Federal Income Tax
Building Permit Tax
IRS Interest Charges
Hunting License Tax
Marriage License Tax
Corporate Income Tax
Personal Property Tax
Accounts Receivable Tax
Recreational Vehicle Tax
Workers Compensation Tax
Watercraft Registration Tax
Telephone Usage Charge Tax
Telephone Federal Excise Tax
Telephone State and Local Tax
IRS Penalties (tax on top of tax)
State Unemployment Tax (SUTA)
Federal Unemployment Tax (FUTA)
Telephone Minimum Usage Surcharge Tax
Telephone Federal Universal Service Fee Tax
Gasoline Tax (currently 44.75 cents per gallon)
Utility Taxes Vehicle License Registration Tax
Telephone Federal, State and Local Surcharge Taxes
Telephone Recurring and Nonrecurring Charges Tax

Bring it!

You left off quite a few. You certainly can't forget the Suntanning Tax. That one there is going directly toward reducing our deficit.

You left off quite a few. You certainly can't forget the Suntanning Tax. That one there is going directly toward reducing our deficit.

Unfortunately though, half of that tax is now being used exclusively by John Baynard.

You left off quite a few. You certainly can't forget the Suntanning Tax. That one there is going directly toward reducing our deficit.

Actually it's used to offset the future cost of ObamaCare, which hasn't kicked in yet. Democrats and their numbers tricks. :roll:

The problem isn't the income it's the spending. You can actually make more money by taxing less. It works. Our President just wasted a trillion dollars and now you're concerned about the deficit? Really?

Yes, really. Continuing these tax cuts or not continuing the tax cuts is a $4 trillion dollar issue.

I want the deficit reduced and I want the budget balanced. This is one BIG step towards accomplishing that.

Supporting the record spending then calling for fiscal responsibility is ridiculous.

Supporting the record spending then calling for fiscal responsibility is ridiculous.

The implication in your statement is that fiscal responsibility is achieved by being either a spender or being a saver, but never both.

Please raise your hand if this tax actually effects you.

3% of $250,000.00 = $7,500