Rick Scott requiring adherance to ethics policy for transition team

So I take it all th democrats on the board have already assumed he'll fail miserably as a governor.

Hmm, that sounds so familiar.. where have I seen this before? 😀

you are deflecting and defending a sociopath

you are deflecting and defending a sociopath

IMHO, your long history of simple platitudes and lack of deep involvement in the discussions here render your opinion irrelevant.

IMHO, your long history of simple platitudes and lack of deep involvement in the discussions here render your opinion irrelevant.

Sorry, Shopper, but Bob comes thru with pithy, meaningful, snippets of truth, which far outweigh your Republican lockstep rationalizing. The sad part is, everyone knows Scott is a sleazebag, but some of you think you're going to profit from it.

Sorry, Shopper, but Bob comes thru with pithy, meaningful, snippets of truth, which far outweigh your Republican lockstep rationalizing. The sad part is, everyone knows Scott is a sleazebag, but some of you think you're going to profit from it.

Bob embodies the lack of rational discourse and middle of the road consensus this country sourly needs. He is CNN, Fox News, and MSNBC, wrapped up all in one. You're acting as an enabler by defending him.

Bob embodies the lack of rational discourse and middle of the road consensus this country sourly needs. He is CNN, Fox News, and MSNBC, wrapped up all in one. You're acting as an enabler by defending him.

When he said "you're defending a sociopath" (in Rick Scott) it rang true to me. So, by defending and enabling a wise guy on a chatboard,that comes up with short, bitingly truthful, and humorous insights, it causes what damage? By you defending and enabling Rick Scott you're enabling a possible sociopath to gain control of the entire financial resources of our state. I don't think he can really perpetrate a massive fraud on that level, but, according to you, he is a smart, clever guy who has "done great things". Your definition of great things is amassing huge sums of wealth by fraudulent means.

When he said "you're defending a sociopath" (in Rick Scott) it rang true to me. So, by defending and enabling a wise guy on a chatboard ,that comes up short bitingly truthful and humorous insights, it causes what damage? By you defending and enabling Rick Scott you're enabling a possible sociopath to gain control of the entire financial resources of our state. I don't think he can really perpetrate a massive fraud on that level, but, according to you, he is a smart, clever guy who has "done great things". Your definition of great things is amassing huge sums of wealth by fraudulent means.

Ok Glen, it's your show! 😀

Bob embodies the lack of rational discourse and middle of the road consensus this country sourly needs. He is CNN, Fox News, and MSNBC, wrapped up all in one. You're acting as an enabler by defending him.

This country is a little sour, but it's not Bob's fault.