Back to SoWal Lounge

Another Obamacare item we should all like

scooterbug44 avatar
scooterbug44SoWal Expert
314 views
I am a HUGE fan of the recent changes to credit card statements that make them much easier to understand and review.

Apparently similar changes to health insurance policies are also underway because of a provision in the health care bill.

Items have to be written up clearly, different companies must use the same terminology so consumers can easily compare, and even the "fine print" can't be smaller then 12 pts.

Speak plain English, health insurers told - Health - Health care - msnbc.com

"Under a little-known provision of the health overhaul law, insurers will be required to provide their benefits information on a standardized chart using the same plain English terms as other companies to help shoppers understand and compare complicated policies.

The law even forbids the dreaded "fine print," by specifying at least a 12-point type size (larger than typical newsprint). Any exceptions or limitations to coverage must be included along with the out-of-pocket costs that plan members can expect to pay.

Choosing the wrong policy can have consequences. For example, when comparing breast cancer treatment coverage under three California policies, the study found that a patient would spend nearly $4,000 for a typical treatment under one policy or as much as $38,000 under another even though both policies had similar deductibles and out-of-pocket limits.

"Health insurance should be transparent, so that consumers know what they are getting in a market filled with options that are not always equal," the researchers concluded."

Replies

4
30ashopper avatar
30ashopperSoWal Insider
#2
..and it only cost us a trillion or so in spending over the first ten years. Imagine that. :sarc:
Beach Runner avatar
Beach Runnerbeats on hood
#3
My employer just offered a free long-term care policy for employees. Three years at $2000 a month for assisted living or nursing home care. Mom's assisted-living expenses have been about $4000 a month, and for about a year when she was in a nursing home they were about $8000 a month. Atlanta would have been more. $2000 a month doesn't begin to cover that, but better than nothing.

We could also choose more options and of course pay more. Because I know what LTC costs, I wanted to explore those options. There were so many questions that many of us asked that the insurance rep couldn't answer, so they extended the open enrollment. You'd have to be an actuary and a lawyer to understand the packet they gave us. Plus they had no way to definitively help us compare policies. No spreadsheets.

So I developed a spreadsheet that compared all options (like expected age of needing benefits, expected number of years of needing benefits, and computations for without inflation versus with inflation). The spreadsheet gave me a real basis for which option to choose.

Insurance companies should be required to present actual data and what-ifs for people who don't have the skills to create their own spreadsheets.
Bob avatar
BobSoWal Insider
#4
the insurance oligopoly does not want disclosure. they collude, exclude, delay, and deny in order to serve their shareholders. such a basic human need tied to profit driven sociopathy is not in the best interest of our country
Abby Prentiss avatar
Abby PrentissBeach Fanatic
#5
the insurance oligopoly does not want disclosure. they collude, exclude, delay, and deny in order to serve their shareholders. such a basic human need tied to profit driven sociopathy is not in the best interest of our country

Capitalism is bad for our country?

Checking your forum account

Please wait while we verify your forum account.