Tunisia, Yemen, Egypt .......... Jordan

Guess there's enough blame to go around-

WASHINGTON ? A small, controversial effort launched under President George W. Bush to fund and train election monitors in Egypt played a key role in the movement to topple President Hosni Mubarak?s regime.




Related




The program, which provided millions in direct funding to prodemocracy groups, helped dispatch 13,000 volunteers to observe Egypt?s parliamentary elections in December. Thousands of those monitors, angered by what they said was blatant election rigging, joined the protests. Some became outspoken leaders; others used the networking and communication skills they learned to help coordinate 18 days of rallies.

?The very fact that they saw the fraud firsthand has contributed to them turning from monitors into activists,?? said Saad Eddin Ibrahim, founder of the Ibn Khaldun Center for Development Studies, which has used a share of the US funds to train volunteers. ?They became very disillusioned with the regime.??

The evolving role of the monitors provides a measure of vindication for Bush administration officials and allies, including Elizabeth Cheney, the daughter of Vice President Dick Cheney, who fought for permission to funnel money to the monitors, bucking a longstanding US policy of giving Egypt a veto over US funds.

?I certainly feel vindicated,?? said Charles King Mallory IV, a former aide to Elizabeth Cheney, who could not be reached for comment.

But it also raises questions about whether some Egyptians will see a grain of truth in Mubarak?s allegations that ?foreign intervention?? fomented the uprising.

Stephen McInerney, executive director of the Project on Middle East Democracy, a Washington-based advocacy and research group, said the protesters would probably still have been active without US support, but they wouldn?t be as well-organized.

?We didn?t fund them to start protests, but we did help support their development of skills and networking,?? he said.
Bush program helped lay the groundwork in Egypt - The Boston Globe

Thanks for posting this... but Good Grief.
The twisting, poking, prodding and chewing back & forth like a dog bone... Clinton, Bush, Obama, whoever... same thing. Damned this way and reviled that way.

Phew! It's exhausting. But IS it productive (or just a giant distraction)?

Should America just gather up her toy$, come home, mind her own business, let the chips fall where they may, and let the world identify their own problems, figure out their own solutions, and fight their own fights?

Yes!

Our decades of meddling have caused most of our current foreign policy problems - and most of the true motivations had to do with $$, especially oil money, not diplomatic issues.

Iran - for some reason they distrust us for overthrowing their government in the 50's for oil money, supporting their enemy in the longest war of the 20th century, and shooting down a passenger plane and killing 290 people.......... and not apologizing.

Afghanistan - we will spend a billion to arm people and fight a war, but not a tenth of that to rebuild or educate.

Iraq - those chemical weapons we were so worried about - funded by US taxpayer backed loans through an Italian Bank (its Atlanta headquarters I must add). Weapons/tech we were fighting in the Gulf Wars - some supplied by US companies.