Back to SoWal Lounge

Biden demands Obama impeachment

idlewindBeach Fanatic
1,028 views
Biden Demands Impeachment - HUMAN EVENTS

:lolabove::lolabove::lolabove::lolabove:

And Dennis Kuchinich weighs in:

PressTV - Kucinich: Obama could be impeached for attacking Libya

Looks like the left has turned on the chosen one as well.

Replies

22
LuciferSam avatar
LuciferSamBanned
#2
Haven't read it yet, but Biden is his protection against impeachment.
poppyBanned
#3
Republicans and regressives showed no interest in impeaching Bush so why would they want to impeach Obama?
idlewindBeach FanaticAuthor
#4
Republicans and regressives showed no interest in impeaching Bush so why would they want to impeach Obama?


It is the liberals who want to impeach in both instances. Conservatives are willing to let the electorial process run its course.😀

If "regressive" means we get to go back to:
1. low national debt,
2. high economic growth,
3. a chance to fulfill the American dream for everyone,
4. a job for everyone who wants one,
5. staying out of foreign wars

then I will gladly wear the label.:clap:
Andy A avatar
Andy ABeach Fanatic
#6
Republicans and regressives showed no interest in impeaching Bush so why would they want to impeach Obama?
You are absolutely right! He now, and going forward, has enough rope to hang himself, so why impeach him?
poppyBanned
#7
It is the liberals who want to impeach in both instances. Conservatives are willing to let the electorial process run its course.😀

If "regressive" means we get to go back to:
1. low national debt,
2. high economic growth,
3. a chance to fulfill the American dream for everyone,
4. a job for everyone who wants one,
5. staying out of foreign wars

then I will gladly wear the label.:clap:

We had all that before you put Bush in office, twice.
Andy A avatar
Andy ABeach Fanatic
#8
Poppy, Bush has been gone for over two years now and we are worse off than we were when he left. Also, the five points Idlewind listed were all prevalent at some point during his tenure. I have seen none of them during Obama's.
jodiFL avatar
jodiFLBeach Fanatic
#9
We had all that before you put Bush in office, twice.
Yep ..we would have to go back to the Clinton days to get there again. But then again he tried to warn of Bin Laden,Quaddafi, etc, but everyone was to worried about his sex life to listen to him.
poppyBanned
#10
Poppy, Bush has been gone for over two years now and we are worse off than we were when he left. Also, the five points Idlewind listed were all prevalent at some point during his tenure. I have seen none of them during Obama's.

Very early before he eff'd everything up.
Bob avatar
BobSoWal Insider
#11
It is the liberals who want to impeach in both instances. Conservatives are willing to let the electorial process run its course.😀

If "regressive" means we get to go back to:
1. low national debt,
2. high economic growth,
3. a chance to fulfill the American dream for everyone,
4. a job for everyone who wants one,
5. staying out of foreign wars

then I will gladly wear the label.:clap:
your list has a repub stench about it
Bob avatar
BobSoWal Insider
#12
You are absolutely right! He now, and going forward, has enough rope to hang himself, so why impeach him?
nice lynching reference
Will B avatar
Will BModerator
#13
nice lynching reference

Don 't take the thread in that direction. You know as well as everybody else that is not what was meant...

Leave it alone...
idlewindBeach FanaticAuthor
#14
your list has a repub stench about it


Your "stench" is my perfume. I suppose you long for the opposites:

1. High national debt
2. no economic growth
3. hopelessness
4. unemployment
5. intervening in everybodies wars and revoltutions.

Is that Democrat "stench?";-)
Bob avatar
BobSoWal Insider
#15
Your "stench" is my perfume. I suppose you long for the opposites:

1. High national debt
2. no economic growth
3. hopelessness
4. unemployment
5. intervening in everybodies wars and revoltutions.

Is that Democrat "stench?";-)

the direct result of repub policy...au de bushee
Bob avatar
BobSoWal Insider
#16
Don 't take the thread in that direction. You know as well as everybody else that is not what was meant...

Leave it alone...
there's a million ways to say it, and you still have to go there don't you?
AndrewG avatar
AndrewGBeach Fanatic
#17
Rather than talk about the disaster that is Obama his supporters want to talk about Bush or turn it into a racist issue. Obama has pushed us all more apart, maxed out the credit cards and now has his own war.
scooterbug44 avatar
scooterbug44SoWal Expert
#18
Did you guys actually read the article?

It was a hoax - they were trying to draw a parallel between the actions of Bush (and the calls for impeachment) and Obama in Libya.
BeachSiO2 avatar
BeachSiO2Beach Fanatic
#19
SB- is that really a hoax or an opportunity to point out the misapplication of rationale based on differinh time and spatial scales (I.e. Hypocrisy). I am NOT antagonistic toward the President (at all) except that I believe he screwed up royally here. As has been pointed out in the past. Just because your actions may be right, they may not be CORRECT.
jodiFL avatar
jodiFLBeach Fanatic
#20
Rather than talk about the disaster that is Obama his supporters want to talk about Bush or turn it into a racist issue. Obama has pushed us all more apart, maxed out the credit cards and now has his own war.

uh,,, excuse me... but I think we all did that on our own...If I could blame it on someone else I would but...as fas as "his own war".. really??

Checking your forum account

Please wait while we verify your forum account.