Back to SoWal Lounge

Who Will Pay for Drug Tests? Who Will Do the Testing?

GoodWitch58Beach Fanatic
2,399 views
Scott's needless, wasteful drug screen plans - St. Petersburg Times
In opposing the establishment of a desperately needed statewide prescription drug database that would reduce crime and save lives, Gov. Rick Scott has cited misguided, ill-informed and unfounded privacy concerns for patient confidentiality. Yet the governor has no problem calling for mandatory drug tests and random drug screens for as many as 100,000 innocent state workers while invading their privacy at a cost of millions of dollars. The lack of intellectual honesty here is remarkable.
Florida has become a laughingstock for its dubious reputation as the "pill mill" capital of the nation, with more than 2,000 lives lost every year through the illegal dispensation of prescription drugs such as oxycodone and Xanax. A prescription drug database, paid for by the drug companies themselves, would go a long way toward addressing the problem by making it more difficult for patients to doctor shop for their drugs. It also would make it easier to crack down on unscrupulous physicians who prescribe the drugs without regard to their medical need. But Scott remains opposed to this lifesaving program.

If all of the governor's drug-testing plans come to pass, the drug screening business in Florida should be booming. So Floridians should not forget that Scott founded Solantic, a chain of walk-in health care clinics, and has placed his ownership into his wife's trust. Solantic promotes its drug screen testing services on its website.

A poster yesterday was talking about consistency...this is beyond understanding.

A family member who has mostly voted Republican asked me yesterday: "Why does Governor Scott hate teachers and state employees so much?" It is a good question. I wonder what his answer is...

Edited

Replies

56
Alicia Leonard avatar
Alicia LeonardSoWal Insider
#27
I'm more upset over the pill mill issue when I have to give all my info to just get my non-prescription allergy meds. Privacy concerns my patootie!
30ashopper avatar
30ashopperSoWal Insider
#28
I'm more upset over the pill mill issue when I have to give all my info to just get my non-prescription allergy meds. Privacy concerns my patootie!

Why do you have to do that? Is that some sort of state or federal law? Sounds rediculous, what are they afriad you're going to do, OD on sudafed?
scooterbug44 avatar
scooterbug44SoWal Expert
#29
No, they're worried she is going to cook meth.

It was a provision of the Patriot Act.

I can pick up prescription medicine w/o showing ID. To buy OTC cold medicine with Sudafed I have to show ID and the pharmacist has to take all my info and log what I bought.

Edited

Teresa avatar
TeresaSoWal Guide
#30
No, they're worried she is going to cook meth.

It was a provision of the Patriot Act.

I can pick up prescription medicine w/o showing ID. To buy OTC cold medicine with Sudafed I have to show ID and the pharmacist has to take all my info and log what I bought.

yep. that's been in force for quite some time. and for good reason I suppose.
LuciferSam avatar
LuciferSamBanned
#31
Wow! You know if an enterprising person knew how to make his own Sudafed, he could make a ton of money without nearly the legal risk of being involved in the ilicit drug trade.
scooterbug44 avatar
scooterbug44SoWal Expert
#32
I'd rather take on the cartels than big Pharm. 😱
30ashopper avatar
30ashopperSoWal Insider
#33
No, they're worried she is going to cook meth.

It was a provision of the Patriot Act.

I can pick up prescription medicine w/o showing ID. To buy OTC cold medicine with Sudafed I have to show ID and the pharmacist has to take all my info and log what I bought.

I hate government.
Alicia Leonard avatar
Alicia LeonardSoWal Insider
#34
No, they're worried she is going to cook meth.

It was a provision of the Patriot Act.

I can pick up prescription medicine w/o showing ID. To buy OTC cold medicine with Sudafed I have to show ID and the pharmacist has to take all my info and log what I bought.

yep. that's been in force for quite some time. and for good reason I suppose.


I was very much for keeping track of the otc meds when it first came out about five years ago. Anything to get that nasty stuff off the streets, but that is also why I call shenanigans on Scott's privacy concerns. Anyone who can't use the fake sudafed, like me, is already having their privacy invaded to be able to control their allergies. :wave:
Alicia Leonard avatar
Alicia LeonardSoWal Insider
#35
No, they're worried she is going to cook meth.

It was a provision of the Patriot Act.

I can pick up prescription medicine w/o showing ID. To buy OTC cold medicine with Sudafed I have to show ID and the pharmacist has to take all my info and log what I bought.

And it all goes into a big state database....:shock:
Teresa avatar
TeresaSoWal Guide
#36
I was very much for keeping track of the otc meds when it first came out about five years ago. Anything to get that nasty stuff off the streets, but that is also why I call shenanigans on Scott's privacy concerns. Anyone who can't use the fake sudafed, like me, is already having their privacy invaded to be able to control their allergies. :wave:

yes, I know and agree! smells very fishy.
Bob Wells avatar
Bob WellsBeach Fanatic
#37
I don't think he feels disdain for public employees, he just doesn't trust their unions. Right so too, like all special interests they should not be allowed dictate policy within our political system. If you're curious about the negative side effects of unions run amuck in a political system, look at states like California.

Scott is an important check in a set of checks and balances.

Dude what the heck is the AMA, ABA, Realator Association, Hospital Association, Assosciation of Counties and Cities, Chamber of Commerce, Florida Fire Chiefs Associations, Florida Sheriffs Association, NRA and AARP and so on and so forth? Governor Scott is just 1 check in the balance of power in the State and the Legislature and he are trying to monkey with the 3 check, the Courts, which harms all of us.
30ashopper avatar
30ashopperSoWal Insider
#38
What's 3 check?
mputnalBeach Fanatic
#39
And it all goes into a big state database....:shock:
I do not think that the Pseudoephedrine purchases goes into a State database. I believe it is just a log that a pharmacy is required to maintain just like then use to do for paregoric. I could be wrong but only the Board of Pharmacy has access to those logs. Law enforcement must have a suponea to get access to those logs. Pharmacies are audited by the BOP regularly for many things including Oxycontin and other Class II narcotics. I am retired now but my pharmacy was audited every six months (I was lucky in having a location so close to the BOP-not) to determine what Doctors are writing prescriptions for control substances. They were more concerned with finding bad Doctors than finding bad patients. As a pharmacist it was not that difficult to know when there was a forgery although it did happen from time to time. I also think that patients needing pain management are finding it easier to just die and that is very sad. Point is that you just can not regulate everything because eventually you will need someone to regulate the regulators. There is plenty of regulation in this industry. South Florida may be an exception to the rule just like the oil drillers are to the Gulf of Mexico.
GoodWitch58Beach FanaticAuthor
#40
What's 3 check?

the judicial system:

Rick Scott, Panhandle King | Crooks and Liars
Give Rick Scott sole authority to appoint Florida judges

A move to restructure the Florida court system, giving more power in choosing judges to Gov. Rick Scott, moved forward in the state House Thursday despite objections that the bills are an attempt to take control of the state judiciary.

The House Civil Justice Committee passed the three bills Thursday afternoon, all opposed by the committee's five Democrats and backed by its 10 Republicans, including Shawn Harrison of Tampa.

Other committee stops and action by the full House and Senate would be needed to pass them. They are:

?An amendment to break the state Supreme Court in two, one court for criminal cases and one for civil cases, adding three justices so each would have five.

* An amendment to abolish the judicial nominating commissions that submit nominees for appeals court and Supreme Court justices.
* The governor would then have sole power to name justices, but the state Senate would have to confirm them. Proponents said it models the federal process for naming justices.
* A bill not requiring an amendment that gives the governor sole power to appoint all members of the judicial nominating commissions that submit nominees for trial court seats

Checking your forum account

Please wait while we verify your forum account.