Replies
15,441Beach FanaticAuthor
I think this song is more applicable. Remember....your guys started this. Dems will not like how this ends..
I think this is what you're trying to say:
SoWal Insider
SoWal Insider
Emerald Pearl Clutcher is having the same dot connecting brain malfunction.
Beach Fanatic
Shiff, what an condesending ahole.I don’t think you can call it treason, but he did try and mislead the America people. He is as low as they go . If he had the transcript that had so much evidence in it, why would he have to lie to everyone. I feel he should be held responsible for his actions.
SoWal Insider
I don’t think you can call it treason, but he did try and mislead the America people. He is as low as they go . If he had the transcript that had so much evidence in it, why would he have to lie to everyone. I feel he should be held responsible for his actions.It was not a transcript so how is it you believe he tried to mislead but don’t feel the need to hold trump responsible when he is the biggest liar and offender?
SoWal Insider
I don’t think you can call it treason, but he did try and mislead the America people. He is as low as they go . If he had the transcript that had so much evidence in it, why would he have to lie to everyone. I feel he should be held responsible for his actions.I'm assuming you have documented proof that he lied. Please provide it to us now.
Beach Fanatic
An ahole is an ahole, regardless of the job that they are sworn to do. Just like Lindsey, Maxine, Kamala and Gaetz... an ahole is an ahole.
Beach Fanatic
I'm assuming you have documented proof that he lied. Please provide it to us now.He said what he was thinking not what was written. What don’t you understand about that. I saw his opening remarks and it was nothing that was in the transcript. So that is your proof. Why did he feel he had to make things up?
Edited
SoWal Insider
He said what he was thinking not what was written. What don’t you understand about that. I saw his opening remarks and it was nothing that was in the transcript. So that is your proof. Why did he feel he had to make things up?Your president* makes up stuff every single day!!! Schiff exaggerates one time and he should be arrested for treason? Hysterical
SoWal Insider
He said what he was thinking not what was written. What don’t you understand about that. I saw his opening remarks and it was nothing that was in the transcript. So that is your proof. Why did he feel he had to make things up?Go back and read it again. The WH released a memo of the call, not a transcript, with 2/3 of the conversation missing. Schiff made it very clear it wasn’t verbatim but his interpretation. I know in the bubblesphere they prefer trump’s short sentence lies and he most likely confused them and the president*, but that is their fault not his.
SoWal Insider
“Do nothing Democrats” proclaims dotard
who spends his days watching tv and sending threatening tweets.
who spends his days watching tv and sending threatening tweets.
SoWal Insider
Is your lying president* faking it or is he actually as nuckin futs as he came across today?
Beach FanaticAuthor
He said what he was thinking not what was written. What don’t you understand about that. I saw his opening remarks and it was nothing that was in the transcript. So that is your proof. Why did he feel he had to make things up?It's called making a case. Prosecutors do it all the time. Maybe you can't draw inferences from the transcript, but most people can, based in part on Trump's bullying personality and past history. The difference with an impeachment case is that criminality or civil liability does not have to be proven, and the burden of proof is not as stringent. Nonetheless, with or without Schiff's entertaining and in my opinion accurate and damning assessment, grounds for impeachment are there in abundance. The transcript itself interpreted in the most literal manner is grounds for impeachment. Trump's numerous instances of obstruction of justice uncovered by Bob Mueller are grounds for impeachment. Finally, Trump's statements resulting from his fits of rage in reaction to the impeachment inquiry will result in ever increasing articles of impeachment in real-time.
Beach FanaticAuthor
Beach Fanatic
It's called making a case. Prosecutors do it all the time. Maybe you can't draw inferences from the transcript, but most people can, based in part on Trump's bullying personality and past history. The difference with an impeachment case is that criminality or civil liability does not have to be proven, and the burden of proof is not as stringent. Nonetheless, with or without Schiff's entertaining and in my opinion accurate and damning assessment, grounds for impeachment are there in abundance. The transcript itself interpreted in the most literal manner is grounds for impeachment. Trump's numerous instances of obstruction of justice uncovered by Bob Mueller are grounds for impeachment. Finally, Trump's statements resulting from his fits of rage in reaction to the impeachment inquiry will result in ever increasing articles of impeachment in real-time.How you feeling now about shifty shift knowing and talking with the whistle blower before he was the whistle blower and telling him him to get a lawyer to help him write the report. This guy needs to resign. The Dems are toast.
Beach FanaticAuthor
How you feeling now about shifty shift knowing and talking with the whistle blower before he was the whistle blower and telling him him to get a lawyer to help him write the report. This guy needs to resign. The Dems are toast.As I said, he's very thorough. I would expect nothing less from a man of his talent and intellect. Kudos to Adam Schiff!
Beach FanaticAuthor
How you feeling now about shifty shift knowing and talking with the whistle blower before he was the whistle blower and telling him him to get a lawyer to help him write the report. This guy needs to resign. The Dems are toast.Put another way, that's part of Adam's job.
Beach Fanatic
Your president* makes up stuff every single day!!! Schiff exaggerates one time and he should be arrested for treason? HystericalWhen did I mention arrested for treason? Oh is that just your interpretation of what I said. Schiff didn't exaggerate, he purposely tried to mislead the American people.
SoWal Insider
When did I mention arrested for treason? Oh is that just your interpretation of what I said. Schiff didn't exaggerate, he purposely tried to mislead the American people.Your president said he should be arrested for treason. Is your president right or wrong?
SoWal Insider
Has Pompeo lawyered up yet? He seems to be in a delicate place? He heard the President* shake down an important ally of ours and covered it up. Somebody in that inner circle is going to crack like a rotten egg.
Beach Fanatic
Your president said he should be arrested for treason. Is your president right or wrong?Like I answered before to someone else. I don't think treason is what he did. But he needs to have some sort of repercussions. What about the news that he advised the whistle blower, shouldn't he be held accountable. It's not looking good for the Dems.
SoWal Insider
Like I answered before to someone else. I don't think treason is what he did. But he needs to have some sort of repercussions. What about the news that he advised the whistle blower, shouldn't he be held accountable. It's not looking good for the Dems.That has been completely debunked. They are just throwing out every lie they can think of at this point. You got to remember that the president released the partial summary of the transcript which clearly has him asking the leader of a foreign country to get dirt on a political opponent. This.Is.Against.The.Law. And your moron-in-chief did it to himself.
Beach FanaticAuthor
Someone please tell me what is improper about a congressman on the intelligence committee assisting an intelligence agent, who wishes to remain anonymous, in the dissemination of incriminating sensitive material.
Beach FanaticAuthor
SoWal Insider
Like I answered before to someone else. I don't think treason is what he did. But he needs to have some sort of repercussions. What about the news that he advised the whistle blower, shouldn't he be held accountable. It's not looking good for the Dems.LVT is correct it has been completely debunked by the WB’s attorneys.
As they have demonstrated on this site right wingers are either too lazy or too stupid to fact check. They just repeat the lies told to them. A recent poll found 60% of Republicans did not believe trump asked about Biden in the Ukraine call yet it’s right there in the memo/transcript the WH released and prez buffoon has admitted it verbally.
Thread locked
This conversation is read-only until a moderator unlocks it.
