TooFarTampa
SoWal Insider
Actually, you're right, Anansi was a bad example.
We do know that Anansi did not create the moon. I will have to look more into this flying spaghetti monster theory. My question is, Who created the spaghetti?Eleven Fla Counties forbid teaching of Evolution
- Thread starter futurebeachbum
- Start date
-
Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.
Actually, you're right, Anansi was a bad example.
We do know that Anansi did not create the moon. I will have to look more into this flying spaghetti monster theory. My question is, Who created the spaghetti?
good post, TFT. I attended a private school, and our science teacher, who was a heavy smoker, was still able to teach us about the problems of smoking, and no one in my class was a regular smoker, at least until after graduating high school. The same lady was also our biology teacher, teaching us about things such as the Theory of Evolution. On the flip-side, every morning in homeroom during our Senior year, she rotated through the roll, asking us to read a short passage from the Bible. It IS possible to study both, with the idea that there are many questions left unanswered.
Actually, you're right, Anansi was a bad example.
It evolved.
I often make my own.
And what does this tell us about SJ's metaphysical beliefs?
They are based on many hours of watching cooking shows on TV. 
I agree with you TFT..that the 2 are totally different subjects. But since public schools HAVE to separate school/church the issue should not even be an issue. They are just trying to find a way around the laws in order to teach religion in public schools. But the reason I brought up FSM is that who is to say which ID theory (God,FSM,Aliens,Allah,etc) do they want to teach? Since most proponents of ID believe the "designer" to be the GOD of Christianity, it is obvious to me that there will be no level playing field as far as the "designer" is concerned.
I think man's thirst for knowledge, experimentation, development of theories, etc. is the definition of Intelligent Design.
God also gave us science, and the actual "unfolding" of a science-based theory of Evolution by man, to me, IS the devine, intelligent, and religious (or spiritual) experience of it.
I realize this may only make sense to me :roll:
It makes sense to a lot of people, but falls under the larger category of philosophy rather than physical science...
This sounds like a bunch of monkey business.