• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.

Legalizing seawalls

New posts

Valerie L

Beach Lover
The folks from Caribbean Conservation Corporation have told me that Rep. Marti Coley is looking to introduce a bill in this session that would legalize all of the illegally-built seawalls and other armoring in Walton County. These structures have taken away habitat from sea turtles, and the courts have agreed--having ruled that a geotube in Inlet Beach be removed in a case that CCC litigated and won. Coley's bill would sidestep the courts and basically bless these horrendous structures that are causing increased erosion and making it more difficult for turtles to nest.

What I would ask each of you to do is:

1) call Rep. Coley's office at 850-488-2873; tell them that folks in South Walton are talking about the possibility that Rep. Coley will introduce a bill that would legalize these seawalls, and ask to be sent a copy of the bill; be sure to remind the assistant answering the phone how bad these walls are for our beaches; so far their office is just hearing from attorneys for wealthy Gulf-front property owners who are writing the bill--I think if they hear from enough people she may not even introduce the bill

2) please spread the word about this around to other concerned turtle folks and ask them to also call Coley's office--it will make a difference to get this out in the open!
I called Coley's office today and they seemed surprised that I knew about the bill, so I hope lots of folks will call and surprise them some more! Thanks for all of your help!
 
The folks from Caribbean Conservation Corporation have told me that Rep. Marti Coley is looking to introduce a bill in this session that would legalize all of the illegally-built seawalls and other armoring in Walton County. These structures have taken away habitat from sea turtles, and the courts have agreed--having ruled that a geotube in Inlet Beach be removed in a case that CCC litigated and won. Coley's bill would sidestep the courts and basically bless these horrendous structures that are causing increased erosion and making it more difficult for turtles to nest.

What I would ask each of you to do is:

1) call Rep. Coley's office at 850-488-2873; tell them that folks in South Walton are talking about the possibility that Rep. Coley will introduce a bill that would legalize these seawalls, and ask to be sent a copy of the bill; be sure to remind the assistant answering the phone how bad these walls are for our beaches; so far their office is just hearing from attorneys for wealthy Gulf-front property owners who are writing the bill--I think if they hear from enough people she may not even introduce the bill

2) please spread the word about this around to other concerned turtle folks and ask them to also call Coley's office--it will make a difference to get this out in the open!
I called Coley's office today and they seemed surprised that I knew about the bill, so I hope lots of folks will call and surprise them some more! Thanks for all of your help!

Do you have a bill number so the bill can be tracked? Also keep in mind when talking to Representative Coley, that she has this annoying habit of stating how she feels to you, which may or may not be in agreement, but from what I have seen this session, has nothing to do with how she ultimately votes. Just ask the teachers.
 
help save Walton County beaches from seawalls!

Yes--please contact Rep. Coley and ask her not to introduce this bill. Many of these walls were built illegally, and instead of complying with Florida law, some Gulf-front property owners (most of whom live out of state) would rather change the law than do what's right for our beaches.

Seawalls increase beach erosion, make it difficult for sea turtles to nest, and ultimately turn our beaches ugly as they are exposed by the rising sea and waves. A number of states have an outright ban on seawalls along ocean/gulf shorelines because of their destructive impacts on beaches.

Contacting Rep. Coley is the number one thing you can do to help Walton County beaches today!!
 
Yes--please contact Rep. Coley and ask her not to introduce this bill. Many of these walls were built illegally, and instead of complying with Florida law, some Gulf-front property owners (most of whom live out of state) would rather change the law than do what's right for our beaches.

Seawalls increase beach erosion, make it difficult for sea turtles to nest, and ultimately turn our beaches ugly as they are exposed by the rising sea and waves. A number of states have an outright ban on seawalls along ocean/gulf shorelines because of their destructive impacts on beaches.

Contacting Rep. Coley is the number one thing you can do to help Walton County beaches today!!


And if you can get a bill number that is the number 1a thing you can do. There are hundreds of bills, I contact legislators all the time on various issues, I get nowhere when I do not have a bill number. Without that number it is almost impossible to find which bill you want them to act upon and sometimes there are similar bills, with different numbers. If you get them to agree not to vote for one, and that bill gets stuck somewhere, but do not tell them about the other, they may vote it in. They DO NOT READ all the bills that they vote on. A lot of times they rely on others to tell them how to vote, especially if they have not heard about a specific bill. Sometimes, other legislators will vote for them, even though this is against the rules.

So by all means call her, but find a bill number and let the rest of us know so we can work with our various networks to get others to call.
 
Also keep in mind when talking to Representative Coley, that she has this annoying habit of stating how she feels to you, which may or may not be in agreement, but from what I have seen this session, has nothing to do with how she ultimately votes. Just ask the teachers.


Like, for example, her position on drilling off SoWal...
 
This must be stopped

This must be stopped; armoring our beaches is just another bad idea. This will be the end of our beaches if this occurs. Just look at Galveston TX. Just a wall with the water slapping against it. There is a reason many, many coastal states outlawed armoring. The facts are clear, the beaches will disappear.
 
An article I wrote in 2005 regarding Armoring

Coastal Erosion solutions: Seawalls, Geo-tubes, Beach Scraping and Beach Nourishment. What is the answer?

Basically, when the ocean rises due to a hurricane there are three powerful forces at work: wind, rising tide and ocean swells from a storm. The water that is moved by those forces moves in three directions. The tide brings the water up, the storm moves the wave action in and the wind pushes the water/waves in the direction of the wind.

Most of us who have experienced a hurricane know that when a storm approaches and we are on the east side of that storm we get winds from the northeast, then east, then southeast, then south and on around to the west and so on. The inverse would be true if we were on the west side of the storm. The key point is that for a large portion of the time the tide is abnormally high, the swells are abnormally big and the east or west current is scouring the beaches parallel to the beach.

The beach sand is a porous movable material that is completely vulnerable to these forces. Solid structures are also vulnerable to these forces but, more importantly the sand next to any solid structure will be scoured away much more rapidly than if there was no solid structure near it.

Let's dispense with scraping first. It makes the beach nicer to look at but that's it. It is newly pushed sand that has no level of impaction so it washes away in minutes. Placing sand back on the cliff/dunes and planting sea oats provides a favorable cosmetic solution.

Seawalls and geo-tubes are solid, heavy structures. Any porous sand next to these structures gets scoured away very rapidly making the situation worse near them. If you have a house next to a seawall, your backyard will go faster as the east riptide and oncoming waves collide with the seawall. The same is true with the beach in front of the seawall. The impact of the water hitting it and pushing sideways with the tide completely eliminates the beach in front of it. All you need to do is look at the wall in Galveston Texas; there used to be a beach there, now you just jump off the wall into the water; no beach. A geo tube is heavy and more solid than the sand. Any thing near these things will have sand scouring next to them too. Also when the water gets behind a seawall it washes away the sand behind it with the same impunity. Some of you might have seen the photo of the breached seawall on Dog Island I posted after Hurricane Dennis.

The largest seawall in the county is being installed just east of Seaside and it runs from the Wheel House/Seagrove villas and ends at the 30-A/395 intersection and could go further as adjacent homeowners buy on. It is roughly 20 feet high and runs 4 blocks long. Adjacent homeowners will be affected and the beach behind that wall will disappear if we get a few more storms to start the scouring activity. The prevailing winds here are from the east and the river of sand that runs along our beach could soon be interrupted and affected by this seawall.

The only solution to our erosion problem is to focus on getting our beaches nourished by pumping sand back on to the beaches. All of Walton County is being surveyed and the wheels are in motion. All these seawalls will do is destroy adjacent property and eliminate the beaches behind them. Geo-tubes will have a similar effect as the water washes over and around them.

Rosemary Beach has investigated thoroughly all options including geotubes and has decided to push for the sand dredging/beach nourishment option. There will be no geotubes or seawalls in Rosemary Beach. They did decide to do some cosmetic work (scraping) on the dunes/cliffs and finish with sea oat plantings. The town manager, James Bagby gave a very informed talk at the Rosemary Beach Homeowners meeting on where the county and federal agency's are in the beach nourishment process and it looks like it could happen countywide if approved. Jim said the pumping would take 3 days to do Rosemary Beach and would raise the beach 6 to 8 feet and go out 100 to 150 feet out.

The nourishment effort/process has taken its course in the west end of the county and they will soon begin pumping sand there. They are beginning the process for our part of the county from Inlet beach down and there will soon be a stage for public input. The whole beachfront of the county is being surveyed for this purpose and sand core samples are being taken in the gulf for sources of white sand. Funding will be an issue but if approved the beaches will be automatically nourished by the federal government after major storms. Panama City beach has been doing this for years already.

In Okaloosa County 5 beachfront homeowners disputed the nourishment project delaying it in lawsuits for 2 years. They were concerned that the thin strip of public access from the high tide waterline to the water would be enlarged if the beach was widened and people would set up beach chairs behind their property. I believe they are now being sued by adjacent owners who lost their homes in recent storms. When the time comes for public input our county voices must be united behind the nourishment answer. That?s the answer.
 
Another article on the power of the water and wind on our beaches

I was asked to repost this letter regarding sand erosion during hurricanes. Hope this helps. Dave

Walton Sun 8/20/05

I have lived in Florida for 33 years and on 30A for 20. I have spent all
but one storm here and have a clear understanding of the power of these
storms. I spent Hurricanes Dennis and Ivan at Seaside at the Holl
building. Because the winds were minimal, I was able to see the power
of the wind and water and the speed with which our recent beach erosion
occurred first hand.

Approximately 35 feet of sand was "placed for protection" or scraped onto
the existing cliffs after Ivan and other smaller storms. The scraping made
the dunes look better and it made everyone feel more secure to shore up
(pun intended) the dunes. People felt that new dune line would defend and
protect us from the ravages of the sea. Sea oats were planted and everyone
breathed a sigh of relief.

At 9 a.m. on the day Dennis approached, I was watching perfect eight to 12
foot waves breaking out in the Gulf. The wind was out of the northeast and
the tide was still low enough so the waves were coming up to the edge of
the 35 feet of sand referenced above.

That morning, high tide hit around noon, which was also near the time the
seas would be peaking. By 10:30 about three feet of that protective sand
cliff was gone. All the beach walkovers, however, were still intact.
The next 55 minutes forever changed my opinion about the protective
measures of beach scraping.

By 11:05 a.m., 35 minutes later, all the sand -- all 32 feet of bulldozer
placed sand -- was gone. All of it, gone, in 35 minutes. Twenty minutes
later, all the walkovers were gone. The water then began pounding the natural,
hard packed, scrub covered dune wall. It took about three hours to take 15 feet
before the tide dropped. By 3:30, the water level had dropped and left
thick blankets of foam on everything.


I saw that no amount of sand dumped on or scraped up to the cliffs will
have any affect on protecting anything. It will just be another expensive
effort to make everyone feel better for the time being. And scraping seems to be
lowering the level of the beach; seems kind of counter intuitive doesn?t it?
Any amount of money building bulkheads or sea-walls will have the same effect.
The only thing that could stop that power is a concrete wall from Panama City to Pensacola,
and we all know that won?t happen.

Last year I bought a house on Dog Island east of Apalachicola. While
shopping, I saw three or four homes on pilings out in the Gulf and a few
damaged ones hanging off the dunes (damage from Ivan). I considered buying
two homes. One was on the Gulf and priced $450,000 but it needed some
serious work. The other house was in perfect shape and priced $699,000.
Both had about 20 feet of dune but would have to be moved back, an
additional $60,000 investment. There were other houses out in the Gulf.
One was suspended high above the water on pilings about 30 feet out onto
the water with its wires and water pipes dangling down to the water.

About a week ago, I returned to Dog Island to check on my house. The homes
that had been out in the gulf were gone. Not a trace. The fixer upper 20 feet behind
the dune line I had considered buying was also gone. The other house I had considered
had crumbled down the dune on to the beach with only the steps left. This same scenario
was repeated all down the beach except for the homes that had been moved back. The house
I bought sits on a 40 foot hill, 100 feet behind the dune line, but I am certain in 30 years
or so, my house will have to be moved back away from the water.

I also saw two homes that had been protected by a 125 foot bulkhead/seawall. The tattered and
breached bulkhead was still out there poking out of the sand. All 20 or so feet of the sand that
had been between the bulkhead and the houses had washed out the sides and through holes in the wall.
One of the homes was left tilting off the dune and the other houses pilings were exposed.
An open, full septic tank was lying on its side.

Beachfront homeowners are struggling with an emotional and financial
tragedy. Commissioners and citizens are frantically searching for answers
and fixes to this on going problem. Brown sand is causing a firestorm of
controversy. Everyone wants our beautiful white beaches and dunes back.
The plain truth is that we have to begin to accept our cliffs. The white
sand always comes back covering the beach and vegetation grows on the cliffs.
Go to any state park where no restoration has been done. It is still beautiful.
different, but beautiful nonetheless.

Beachfront homeowners should seriously consider moving their homes back. I
can?t imagine any commission not relaxing front setback lines to allow
this. Moving homes back it the most accepted practice on Dog Island.
The cost might not be too different from building elaborately
expensive bulkheads and dumping ton after ton of sand behind them.
Moving their home is not practical for everyone but still a possible
solution for many.

A word about walkovers: There should be one county approved design for all
public and private beach walkovers. They should be built so most of the
walkover is at least 15 feet above the beach. Pilings should go much
deeper in the sand so the water just washes under the pilings.
They should have a break away stair so only the stair would need to be
replaced and picked up after the storm. WaterColor has a retractable metal
stair that they take in if a storm hits. Expensive but effective.

Nothing will stop this natural process of erosion except perhaps dredging
sand onto the beaches as they did in Panama City. Dredging also has
negative environmental factors and the sand color is a risk, but Panama
City had little or no damage to homes with the exception of Pinnacle Port
where no dredging was done. Dredging is expensive but effective if it is
done every few years. The dune scraping may make the beaches look better
but it is a waste of time and money as far as slowing any erosion goes.

This county and its citizens have to pull together and stop using golden
water buckets and Evian water to put out a forest fire. Spending
hundreds of thousands, even millions of dollars on scraping sand that will
wash away in 30 minutes is a waste. Bulkheads and poorly designed
beach walkovers just add to the debris.

Septic tanks have to be completely outlawed or moved to the front of the properties
until sewer service is available everywhere. Little Redfish Lake just west
of the breached Gulf Trace septic tanks still has a e-coli count several times
normal levels. Both Inlet beach and Gulf trace beachfront homeowners should be
required to hook up to sewer when available.

The force of moving water is much stronger than most realize. It vaporized
the dunes in minutes. I see a lot of panic and reactionary response
but we have to agree on two things. We can?t stop the water and the
dunes don?t protect us from the water. The sooner we all realize that,
the sooner we can all agree and get working on the very few solutions we have.
And there really are only a few.


Dave Rauschkolb
 
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter












                               
Back
Top