ASH
Beach Fanatic
Partly right and partly wrong. There were many who ask what they could do and were misinformed or misled on every level. There were some who didn't ask or went on the "forgiveness" assumption.
Now, no one wants to really address the issue sensibly, IMO. There has never been this type of armoring constructed in the U.S. or elsewhere that I am aware of. It is strictly for structure protection, not even close to the water and buried under tons of sand. Where is the erosion factor? I am not a marine scientist but common sense seems to say where the water isn't lapping the armoring, and the armoring can't even be seen, little damage is occurring, but of course I could be wrong.
Andy, you know I love you man, but I must disagree. You only need to walk down half those 69 steps and look either direction to note how much of that bank is already gone. What is that drop off like right now? 15 feet! More? How much more will come down this year in the storms coming before that seawall is exposed?
I don't understand all the wording going on in the proposed bill, but aren't there some questions about costs incurred being shifted to taxpayers who may not have agreed with the armoring in the first place.
I don't hide my opinion regarding turtles and I haven't completely made my decision regarding homes being so close to the gulf, but I do have an opinion when it's my tax dollars.
Who understands and can speak to the money shift to tax payers this bill might cause?