• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.

Missing Richard Nixon

New posts

Bob

SoWal Insider
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/31/opinion/31krugman.html?em Op-Ed Columnist
Missing Richard Nixon

By PAUL KRUGMAN
Published: August 30, 2009

Many of the retrospectives on Ted Kennedy?s life mention his regret that he didn?t accept Richard Nixon?s offer of a bipartisan health care deal. The moral some commentators take from that regret is that today?s health care reformers should do what Mr. Kennedy balked at doing back then, and reach out to the other side.

But it?s a bad analogy, because today?s political scene is nothing like that of the early 1970s. In fact, surveying current politics, I find myself missing Richard Nixon.

No, I haven?t lost my mind. Nixon was surely the worst person other than Dick Cheney ever to control the executive branch.

But the Nixon era was a time in which leading figures in both parties were capable of speaking rationally about policy, and in which policy decisions weren?t as warped by corporate cash as they are now. America is a better country in many ways than it was 35 years ago, but our political system?s ability to deal with real problems has been degraded to such an extent that I sometimes wonder whether the country is still governable.

As many people have pointed out, Nixon?s proposal for health care reform looks a lot like Democratic proposals today. In fact, in some ways it was stronger. Right now, Republicans are balking at the idea of requiring that large employers offer health insurance to their workers; Nixon proposed requiring that all employers, not just large companies, offer insurance.

Nixon also embraced tighter regulation of insurers, calling on states to ?approve specific plans, oversee rates, ensure adequate disclosure, require an annual audit and take other appropriate measures.? No illusions there about how the magic of the marketplace solves all problems.

So what happened to the days when a Republican president could sound so nonideological, and offer such a reasonable proposal?
 
In his last writings, even Hunter Thompson expressed sort of a longing for the Nixon era at least when compared to the current state of affairs.
 
I saw the thread title and I thought-

Richard Nixon is missing? Didn't he die?!
 
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/31/opinion/31krugman.html?em Op-Ed Columnist
Missing Richard Nixon

By PAUL KRUGMAN
Published: August 30, 2009

Many of the retrospectives on Ted Kennedy?s life mention his regret that he didn?t accept Richard Nixon?s offer of a bipartisan health care deal. The moral some commentators take from that regret is that today?s health care reformers should do what Mr. Kennedy balked at doing back then, and reach out to the other side.

But it?s a bad analogy, because today?s political scene is nothing like that of the early 1970s. In fact, surveying current politics, I find myself missing Richard Nixon.

No, I haven?t lost my mind. Nixon was surely the worst person other than Dick Cheney ever to control the executive branch.

But the Nixon era was a time in which leading figures in both parties were capable of speaking rationally about policy, and in which policy decisions weren?t as warped by corporate cash as they are now. America is a better country in many ways than it was 35 years ago, but our political system?s ability to deal with real problems has been degraded to such an extent that I sometimes wonder whether the country is still governable.

As many people have pointed out, Nixon?s proposal for health care reform looks a lot like Democratic proposals today. In fact, in some ways it was stronger. Right now, Republicans are balking at the idea of requiring that large employers offer health insurance to their workers; Nixon proposed requiring that all employers, not just large companies, offer insurance.

Nixon also embraced tighter regulation of insurers, calling on states to ?approve specific plans, oversee rates, ensure adequate disclosure, require an annual audit and take other appropriate measures.? No illusions there about how the magic of the marketplace solves all problems.

So what happened to the days when a Republican president could sound so nonideological, and offer such a reasonable proposal?



He gets his ass handed to him by Obama.....
 
But the Nixon era was a time in which leading figures in both parties were capable of speaking rationally about policy, and in which policy decisions weren?t as warped by corporate cash as they are now. America is a better country in many ways than it was 35 years ago, but our political system?s ability to deal with real problems has been degraded to such an extent that I sometimes wonder whether the country is still governable.

Nixon also embraced tighter regulation of insurers, calling on states to ?approve specific plans, oversee rates, ensure adequate disclosure, require an annual audit and take other appropriate measures.? No illusions there about how the magic of the marketplace solves all problems.

Every day I become more and more appalled at just how screwed up so many things are because of lobbyists and special interests having WAY too much influence in our government.

You name it, it is set up to favor an industry or corporation over the American citizen. :angry:
 
Richard Nixon was a statist in conservative clothing. The only thing worse than some of his policies ( remember wage and price controls?) was his morals and ethics. He is a black mark on the Republican party.
 
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter












                               
Back
Top