Back to All About SoWal

Lowering the speed limit on 30A?

SGB avatar
SGBBeach Fanatic
51,440 views
A speed bump on 30A... As citizens strive to lower speed limit, bigger plans emerge | 30a, speed, change - Local News - WaltonSun.com


A SPEED BUMP ON 30A: As citizens strive to lower speed limit, bigger plans emerge
January 08, 2010 10:30 AM
By Matt Algarin

Will 45 be a thing of the past on 30A?

Friends of Scenic 30A and members of the public gathered on Jan. 4 to discuss lowering the speed limit on 30A to 35 mph for the entire 18.5 mile stretch. The change would let low-speed vehicles, like street-modified golf carts, share the roadway with cars.

Bill Freeze, Chairperson for the Friends, believes the change will have nothing but positive end results.

?These beaches have been voted as one of the 12 best places to see in 2010.? Freeze said. ?We have noticed that we need to educate the tourists and the residents about what we have here in paradise.?

Freeze added that LSVs have to be registered and licensed, which will provide additional income for the county.

About two dozen supportive residents and industry experts gathered to hear the proposals made by the group.

In order for an electric cart or LSV to share the roadway with cars, the speed limit can be no greater than 35 mph. There are currently four miles of roadway on 30A where the speed limit is 45 mph.

In addition to allowing LSVs to traverse the roadway, supporters say the change would help to alleviate some of the traffic by encouraging motorists who are in a hurry to use the feeder roads that run north and south to get to their destinations.

Graham Fountain, chief of special operations for the Sheriff?s Office, clarified that this only pertains to electric carts, not golf carts.

?Because it looks like a duck, talks like a duck and quacks like a duck, but it?s a goose,? Fountain said while describing that anyone who is caught driving a gas-powered cart on 30A would be ticketed.

?The sheriff?s office will be taking a neutral position on the topic,? Fountain said of the speed-limit change. ?We haven?t pulled traffic (data) to see how many crashes involved these types of vehicles.?

?We do have some concerns because 30A is a little atypical than the usual roads you may do this on,? Fountain added. ?When the building starts up again on 30A you are going to have a lot more dump trucks and mixers going up and down the road.?

Tim Paul, who is a former district five commissioner and developer of Topsail Village on 30A, said changing the speed limit should be the first step.

?I think the whole idea is to have a complete system,? Pauls said. ?You shouldn?t have to only be able to use your LSV on 30A. You should actually be able to make a useful trip with it.?

Tom Stein, the Director for the Friends of Scenic 30A, agreed.

Stein said he ?has always had a lifetime interest in public transit and was a cable car grip man in San Francisco for four years.

?With my background in public transit and in addition to living here for the past 30 years or so watching the traffic load increase here on 30A,? Stein said, ?it has led me to the conclusion that some kind of public transit needs to be established on 30A.?

Stein said that the time is imminent and that something has to happen now.

The Friends of Scenic 30A will be holding another public forum on the first Monday in February to discuss updates on traffic crashes and the price tag for redesigning 30A for a bike path and low speed vehicles.

Replies

285
Just Curious avatar
Just CuriousBeach Fanatic
#77
I have read it in a couple of different threads so far that this is being "pushed" by some higher ups or business. If you read the article this was a public workshop to discuss the idea, not push it on anyone, hosted by the Friends of 30-A. "The Friends of 30-A" is a group of citizens and business that live and are located along 30-A, not some government entity that has a secret mission. They have done a lot of work to help improve 30-A and we can thank them for 30-A being designated a Scenic Highway.
I don't think they are trying to create business for any particular company. I think they are trying to alleviate some of the traffic issues we have. The resoning is, if you allow LSV's to drive the entire distance of the road it will be that many fewer cars on the road.
I don't personally like the idea, because I don't want to be stuck behind them. Just picture what the scene would be like of an accident with an LSV and any automobile. But that was the intent of the meeting, and they are having another meeting so everyone can go and give their 2 cents there.
Out of cuirousity, Robertsondavies, were you at the meeting to push your viewpoint?
seagrovegirl avatar
seagrovegirlBeach Fanatic
#79
Another point is that Walton and Okaloosa County have a committee to research how to make traffic flow better and to find an alternate route due to congestion. So my question is: Why would the county allow LSV's to congest an already overly impacted county road, scenic or not. And, emergency vehicle response time is another concern.
Geo avatar
GeoBeach Fanatic
#80
Al Gore invented the golf cart!
scooterbug44 avatar
scooterbug44SoWal Expert
#81
I'm willing to keep the small tiny stretches west of Grayton industrialized as major thoroughfares at 45 MPH, not 35 MPH, if that will apease the anti LSVers as a compromise. It's literally just the 1.2 mile stretch at Watersound that is at issue.

How much time do folks actually save by going 45 MPH for 1.2 miles, instead of 35 MPH? Any physics or algebra majors here? I'd like to put a number on it. Is it 10 seconds? 15 seconds? I'll be the over under is 8 seconds?

I am not anti-LSV, I am anti-LSV in this particular circumstance/on this particular road. We all know that it's not a matter of 45 mph for 1.2 miles, it is a matter of 25 MPH or less, underage drivers, unrestrained kids, and a BAD mix of vehicles!
poppyBanned
#82
If an LSV is losing its charge and slows down below 25 mph it should be legal for a motorized vehicle (read car) to give it a little "nudge" to help it along it's merry way.😀
Matt J avatar
Matt JSWGB
#83
And why...are greenies so obnoxious??? The mentality baffles me and it hinders honest and open debate. Some of the golf carts on the road are owned by people who have invested in their second home McMansion, with a swimming pool, irrigation system and probably on a golf course that does not have a recycling irrigation system and pollutes our lakes with pesticides and fertilizers. So the going green argument is BS.

As a "greenie", I take exception to that. These things are billed as green, but are in fact not. Some people think that if a vehicle is electric it's going to magically save the Earth. In this case it's not as it promotes joy riding and non use of truely green modes of transportation like biking or heaven forbid walking.
Seasider avatar
SeasiderBeach Lover
#84
How about improving and widening the multi-use path along the 45 mph stretches so that it could accomodated both low speed electric vehicles and "high speed" bikes that would ordinarily be on the road?
Lake View Too avatar
Lake View TooSoWal Insider
#85
I think golf carts on 30-A is an incredibly bad idea. There are more than a few issues with the existing bike path, that I can't forsee it ever getting improved enough to make it viable for golf cart use. The intersection of 30-A and 395 would have to be resolved as well as all places that the bike path crosses 30-A. The number one problem with the bike path is that it needs to be at least one car length away from 30-A at all places that roads intersect 30-A to make it possible for drivers to see all traffic before turning onto the 30-A. Our County fixing this problem? I don't think so. Let the golf carts stay in their little developements and everybody's fine.
Geo avatar
GeoBeach Fanatic
#86
Just trying to be provocative---

does anyone know why they are
called golf carts?
Geo avatar
GeoBeach Fanatic
#87
I'll answer- because they are driven on golf courses by golfers.
JUL avatar
JULBeach Fanatic
#88
some things are best left as is, 30A is at the top of the list.
scooterbug44 avatar
scooterbug44SoWal Expert
#89
Mama Scooterbug summed it up very well: "Why would you want those things on the HIGHWAY?"

Papa Scooterbug thinks it's a great idea. He wants to move down here, drive a cart all over pissing people off, and then when it gets too unbearably hot for him (early April), jump in his cart and head up I-65 (using the apron/shoulder for safety of course). :roll:
Teresa avatar
TeresaSoWal Guide
#90
As a "greenie", I take exception to that. These things are billed as green, but are in fact not. Some people think that if a vehicle is electric it's going to magically save the Earth. In this case it's not as it promotes joy riding and non use of truely green modes of transportation like biking or heaven forbid walking.

I've never thought of a golf carts or any small recreational vehicle as "green" in any sense. its just a fun travel toy when used off the golf course. maybe its practical for some folks. but it ain't green by any means.

Checking your forum account

Please wait while we verify your forum account.