Lowering the speed limit on 30A?

All I know is that when I pull out to scenic 98 in destin, at 7:30 am, i shouldnt have to worry about ma and pa kettle checking out the scenery at 15 mph. all I ask is that you GO THE FREAKING SPEED LIMIT AT 35. i had a man point at the MPH sign as he was driving (he was probably 95) and it said 35. he was going 20. like I was doing something wrong by tailgating him. JUST GOOOOO.... we have JOBSS!!!!!

Do LSVs include mopeds? I know the tourists love them, but they've become an eye sore / noise nuisance on scenic 98.

I appreciate your viewpoint and you posting your opinions, even if a tad aggressive. A lone voice need not be any louder to be heard on this forum.

I admit to never having thought about LSVs before this thread, or have any knowledge of the statute or what is going on in the rest of Florida.

LSVs seem to make sense in the homogenous environment of a planned community. They don't make nearly as much sense on a 17-mile long county highway connecting diverse communities, many of which aren't LSV friendly.

The green argument holds little water because SoWal is a destination for families in SUVs. Adding LSVs for them after they get here just adds to the drain of raw materials for LSV production, the energy costs of LSV manufacture and operation, and the pollution and land filling disposal of the vehicle at some point in the future.

When SoWal starts getting planned communities for permanent residents, then maybe the green argument will make sense.

Sorry Kurt, but the green argument is valid! Yes the family may come down in a SUV but if we can reduce the emissions in the air produced by that SUV by having it parked for a week we have done good. Some people seem to be forgetting the fragile eco-systems that surround us in Walton County and how detrimental air pollution is to the plant and animal life in the area. Take into consideration that Southern Co. (Gulf Power) is in the beginning processes of converting several of their local power plants to burn bio-mass as opposed to fossil fuels. Combine a "clean power plant" w/ a no emissions vehicle and we have a start to some of our environmental issues.


Robert Davies I have your back! Even though I will catch flack because I have a vested interest in all of this.

Adding LSVs for them after they get here just adds to the drain of raw materials for LSV production, the energy costs of LSV manufacture and operation, and the pollution and land filling disposal of the vehicle at some point in the future.

Stein said, “it has led me to the conclusion that some kind of public transit needs to be established on 30A.”

To me, this is the best thing I took from that original post. Imagine if we had electric or clean CNG-bus shuttles running back and forth on 30A. Most resort areas have something like this. The one I just saw in W. Maui was being used by locals and tourists alike-- $1 a ride. I think it would definitely reduce traffic, pollution, allow teenagers some mobility, and provide a great option for the tourists who fly in to the new airport who don't want to rent a car. Might even cut down on LSV usage. I know I'd use a SoWal shuttle if we had one...

This entire debate is summed up in one very simple, common sense idea. And that is: Hwy 30A is a highway with cars, trucks, SUVs, and many out of town drivers, and sometimes it is absolutely congested with motor traffic, bikes and pedestrians on walking path... For the safety of everyone - residents and tourists - keep golf carts, mopeds and anything NOT a real car - off the road.

SAFETY. that is the one and only factor that really needs consideration. I could care less if the speed limit is lowered - maybe it should be in places - for safety reasons. but not to allow carts on the highway - which would only serve to increase danger for everyone.

green is always good. but not at the expense of lives - a big indication that the issue of carts on a highway was never green to start with.
thank you.

Tootsie, if it were ALL ABOUT SAFETY as you say,then logically not only must Bikes not ever use 30A, but 30A should be made a LIMITED ACCESS FREEWAY, in order to Save Lives. This will confine dangerous pedestrian and bike crossings to only two or three spots on 30A, with on ramps and off ramps etc to allow flow, and also this Freeway should have a few elevated sections (i.e. thru seaside and rosemary). This will be SAFER, but is it what we want? Not me, but I think of 30A as a resort area, perhaps because I don't live there. Now you may live there, but if there weren't a lot of folks using 30A as a resort, I'm not sure if 98% of the locals wouldn't live there either. Seems to me the entire economy of South Walton is linked to tourism - but producing memories, not widgets, but I could be wrong, I know there used to be a turpentine industry there.

30A is not a resort. there are resort towns located here and there along the highway but that doesn't mean golf carts need to travel on the highway. there are really long stretches between developments and beach communities. it is a HIGHWAY for goodness sake. Bikes and pedestrians have their own pathway - separate and apart from the highway.

I should have said that for ME - the primary concern is safety. Good grief - Hwy 30A is not one little resort town. It is several communities along a long stretch of highway. Many full time residents live and work and travel that highway. The many visitors and their children should find safety on that highway as well. we've made good progress in providing a wonderful path for pedestrians and bikers.

If I wanted to use a golf cart in a resort town, I would find an actual resort town that allows them on safe small roads with very low limits. I guess you could ride around in one in Rosemary Beach or Seaside - if those communities allow them and provide places for them to be parked near a beach access - what other reason would there be to ride in a golf cart or lsv? when you get to the beach with your family, you either have your own car or you have rented one. now you want to have two modes of transporation? and you call that green? I don't get it.

I can't imagine a family in town loading up on a golf cart in order to go from Seaside to Grayton Beach for lunch and shopping. not only unsafe as all hell on a highway with cars, construction vehicles and really big delivery and other trucks, but really inefficient way to travel distances over about half a mile or so - with children. I have seen the way some visitors drive around here during peak season - they are in a hurry, don't know where they are going, probably have had a few drinks... I stay away from 30A as much as I can during peak season. I can't imagine putting my children in a golf cart to travel any distance down a highway during peak season in a huge vacation area. totally insane imo.

For safetys' sake it should be made a FREEWAY, with ZERO cars and ZERo LSV's allowed then. I disagree respectfully with your point, that 30A is not a resort area. Yes it is not a legally defined Planned Unit Develoment per se.. sure.. but it is one cohesive resort area, bound by many things, like this website for one. Watercolor, just aint Watercolor without Seaside, and without the run of 30A to Grayton's offerings, and Deer Lake's beauty. When people stay in Seagrove Beach they lunch at Bud & Alley's Taco Bar for instance, ditto the folks in Watercolor who frequent Sundog Books, or Cafe Onano. Cohesively bound by a unique geography, a wonderful mutli-use path, a world renowned architectural and urban planning style called new urbanism, a sense of community, a place of being, a state of mind (SoWal), etc. 30A is a wonderfully elegant resort area, with distinctive, interactive neighborhoods. That it is technically not one PUD resort is missing the point about people actually USE the area, and THINK about the area. It is a good point of debate however. I hate to see 30A as a FREEWAY or Highway running efficiently, through a series of numerous and different (perhaps controlled access even in future) resort 'hoods. If what you say are true, and shared view of enough people, you can just raise the speed limit on 30A to 50MPH, and then make it "safe" because no LSV's will then be allowed on it at all. The new I- 30 Interstate will also help make your point

Sorry, I'm still siding with the Friends of 30A on this one...

No INTERSTATING of 30A !

For safetys' sake it should be made a FREEWAY, with ZERO cars and ZERo LSV's allowed then. I disagree respectfully with your point, that 30A is not a resort area. Yes it is not a legally defined Planned Unit Develoment per se.. sure.. but it is one cohesive resort area, bound by many things, like this website for one. Watercolor, just aint Watercolor without Seaside, and without the run of 30A to Grayton's offerings, and Deer Lake's beauty. When people stay in Seagrove Beach they lunch at Bud & Alley's Taco Bar for instance, ditto the folks in Watercolor who frequent Sundog Books, or Cafe Onano. Cohesively bound by a unique geography, a wonderful mutli-use path, a world renowned architectural and urban planning style called new urbanism, a sense of community, a place of being, a state of mind (SoWal), etc. 30A is a wonderfully elegant resort area, with distinctive, interactive neighborhoods. That it is technically not one PUD resort is missing the point about people actually USE the area, and THINK about the area. It is a good point of debate however. I hate to see 30A as a FREEWAY or Highway running efficiently, through a series of numerous and different (perhaps controlled access even in future) resort 'hoods. If what you say are true, and shared view of enough people, you can just raise the speed limit on 30A to 50MPH, and then make it "safe" because no LSV's will then be allowed on it at all. The new I- 30 Interstate will also help make your point

Sorry, I'm still siding with the Friends of 30A on this one...

No INTERSTATING of 30A !