6thGen is right.
Chickpea, the Prius is a status car.
How do I know this, -well as everybody with half a brain knows the whole environmental movement was fabricated by a consortium of One World Government Socialists and an advertising agency out of Hollywood, probably run by homosexuals.
It is nothing more than a fad and an international conspiracy wrapped up in a celebrity endorsed package.
We all know how every mindless teeny-bopper wants to be just like Paris and Brittany and clearly environmentalists are just slightly grown up versions of the same mentality. Do not fall victim to this too.
Chickpea, I don’t know you from Eve, but I’ll wager that you were a mediocre student now pecking away at a mindless 9-5 job and desperately trying to find a way to crawl herself up the social ladder. And the Prius just seems like an easy way to earn the respect of those Hollywood types you so desperately want to impress. Let me suggest that you spend less time trying to impress, well Ted Danson and more time applying yourself to this great capitalist system that we call America.
Hard work will get you to where you clearly strive to be, and then you too can drive the only cars in America that are above the demeaning term ‘status cars’. You know, cars like Bently, Ferrari, or a Hummer. Anyone who is rich enough to drive these doesn’t need to buy a symbol of status since, self evidently, they already have status.
Good luck, work hard, and happy Hummer driving!
:funn: Chickpea, needing status? Me thinks not. Those of us who know Chickpea are impressed with her work, what she has accomplished (not only for herself but for others), and her commitment to environmental efficiency already.
By the way, I have no idea what Chickpea's grades were (I suspect they were pretty darn good), but there's plenty of research out there that mediocre students are just as likely to be more successful in life than A students because grades in school don't predict things like hard work, integrity, planfulness, mindfulness, goodwill and supportiveness to others, proactivity, reliability, the development of an expertise (e.g., being at the top of one's field), a lifelong desire to learn, emotional intelligence, and other characteristics. "A" students have more of a tendency to over-rely on their analytical abilities and assume those abilities are most of what it takes to be successful/happy/ethical. Not.
As for 9-5 jobs and moving up the social ladder -- these seem to be decent choices to me. For many people, moving up the social ladder means getting more respect (sadly, many people don't treat people in certain jobs/social categories with respect so it's no surprise someone would want to get out of those categories). And many (perhaps most) 9-5 jobs aren't necessarily mindless, it's the people in them who can choose to do them mindlessly or not. And whether someone feels they have some control over how they do their job is more important than whether it's a 9-5 job or not. Anway, even though you're just having some fun with words, I'll note that it's a contradiction to be poo-pooing people who have 9-5 jobs and who want to "move up" and at the same time present oneself as supporting capitalism. Even more interesting is that the contradiction suggests some very elitist assumptions.
I realize you were just fooling around with words; it was a good opportunity for me to fool around with words, too, and lay out some of the research on what predicts success and clarify any misguided assumptions about what predicts success -- and what is (and isn't) classy.