I am not impressed with any news programs on TV - the stories are just not very interesting, seem to be the same old thing, with a focus on tragic events and criminal activity, but I do look at them on occasion (no young child should view any of it). I absolutely could not imagine watching Fox News for serious news. It is so scarey that it even exists in this country.
CNN works okay for me if I really want to know what's going on outside sowal. I do believe they offer "balance" - at least as much as any serious news network.
Fox News can't be considered a serious news network. But, I do know those who believe it to be such.

"...fair and balanced..."
If you have to say your are, you aren't.
If you really have to resort to name calling at least you could spell it correctly.
It is ?bigot? not ?beget?.
Also, I doubt that I would qualify for your label as I am a registered independent who just does not like being manipulated by the media, etc.
In particular I do not like hate mongering, name calling, and blatant distortion of the news all of which happens more frequently on Fox News than any other of the networks.
Oh by the way, ?commendable? is not spelled ?comendable?
I prefer your suggestion of using my remote control. Not a big fan of stalking and haranguing a fellow while he is relaxing.Those that you that are not happy with Fox News, keep in mind that the news director is a resident somewhere down around the Camp Creek area. He said he likes to kayak in the dune lakes when he is down here, so seek him out and see if you can show him the error of his ways. Seemed like a reasonable guy. I just can not remember his name. Oh well.
Andy A: The differences between ecopal and me go back a lot further than just a few mispelled words.We all need "spell check". I spelled bigot begot in my las post. Oh well, we all have spelling lapses as well as others occasionally.