I don't have a problem with signs to help tourists navigate 30-A, but it's not exactly a complex maze of interchanges, many lanes of high speed traffic, or confusing terrain. If they need garish 15' high signs to find their way along 30-A, I don't know how they 1) drove from their home to 30-A 2) passed their driver's test. As with the flag warning system, I think people are just oblivious or unaware, not that more or bolder signs are needed.
They followed the signs to 30-A.
I don't understand why you think that anyone would automatically know where these beach communites begin and end. Sure its very easy to find 30-A but if you are from out of town and you are looking for a restaurant in Seagrove that is something that one does not automatically know.
I don't see any relationship at all to letting someone know where something is located in an area they might not be familiar with and being able to pass a driving test. Comments such as that do nothing to support your validity to changing the signs.
If all the signs were removed from 30-A, how would one know where one community begins and ends?
I have no problem with some other type of sign, but to insinuate that one can't drive to SoWal or take a driver's test is related to wanting clarification to the location of certain areas on 30-A, is ridiculous at best.
If your problem is simply with the design of the sign that is understandable, if your dislike is having signs at all, well then I disagree with your reasoning on them not being needed.