You make great points in paragraph one. But you really go to the dark side after that...
What posts from which people are you reading that fuel the ideas that I have bolded in your paragraph 2?
Last edited:
Dick Cheney Indicted
- Thread starter Geo
- Start date
-
Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.
You make great points in paragraph one. But you really go to the dark side after that...
What posts from which people are you reading that fuel the ideas that I have bolded in your paragraph 2?
Not sure about Vanguard Group
They also indicted him for "at least misdemeaner assault. It sounds pretty stupid.
This part is unclear to me, but it does not appear that he is a direct investor in the firm managing the prisons, but in the Vanguard Group, who in turn invested in the manager of the prisons. If this is the case, then it is very possible that I will be indicted for assault as well. If this Vanguard Group is the same as the Vanguard Group that manages Vanguard Funds, then I own some of their funds.
On the surface, it seems that not much is there, but it is interesting that the keyboards around SoWal are wet with drool from those who have him convicted and pardoned.
Not a lot of objectivity these days.
They also indicted him for "at least misdemeaner assault. It sounds pretty stupid.
This part is unclear to me, but it does not appear that he is a direct investor in the firm managing the prisons, but in the Vanguard Group, who in turn invested in the manager of the prisons. If this is the case, then it is very possible that I will be indicted for assault as well. If this Vanguard Group is the same as the Vanguard Group that manages Vanguard Funds, then I own some of their funds.
On the surface, it seems that not much is there, but it is interesting that the keyboards around SoWal are wet with drool from those who have him convicted and pardoned.
Not a lot of objectivity these days.
Cheney is not exactly a boy scout, so if he did do something wrong, I would certainly like to see him punished - as I would any elected official.
Yes, we are completely unobjective - as you can see from the statement below I am prepping the torches and pitchforks. :roll:
Last edited:
BS,
There are plenty of people on this board who remain objective and who disagree with you.
You seem to be reacting to what you think are other people's beliefs without actually reading (or giving a fair sniff to) what they have actually written here...
Perfect example- read the posts on this thread regarding pardons. I find discussion on the subject that comes from more of an academic perspective than anything else. No emotion, no opinions, no hate spewing, etc.
There are plenty of people on this board who remain objective and who disagree with you.
You seem to be reacting to what you think are other people's beliefs without actually reading (or giving a fair sniff to) what they have actually written here...
Perfect example- read the posts on this thread regarding pardons. I find discussion on the subject that comes from more of an academic perspective than anything else. No emotion, no opinions, no hate spewing, etc.
You can hope and pray that there will be some sort of justice meaded out as a result of this; however ,the only thing that will come of it in the long run is a lively debate on Sowal...
My bad
Sorry, I thought that "Malevolent bitter schemer.....spineless AG....won't go anywhere because of Bush pardons (who's guilty?) ...you can hope and pray that justice would be meaded out (assuming that Cheney not guilty is not justice)"... were not too objective.
There was also a doctored photo of Karl Rove in handcuffs entitled "next" that was removed that I incorrectly assumed to be a rush to judgement.
Looking back at this entire thread has made me realize that these were really compliments, and that there was a lot of concern that the facts be considered before there was a rush to judgement.
Sorry, I thought that "Malevolent bitter schemer.....spineless AG....won't go anywhere because of Bush pardons (who's guilty?) ...you can hope and pray that justice would be meaded out (assuming that Cheney not guilty is not justice)"... were not too objective.
There was also a doctored photo of Karl Rove in handcuffs entitled "next" that was removed that I incorrectly assumed to be a rush to judgement.
Looking back at this entire thread has made me realize that these were really compliments, and that there was a lot of concern that the facts be considered before there was a rush to judgement.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes. I apologize--I removed it myself. It was in bad taste and did not progress the Cheney thread conversation. Things will come out, or they may never come out, those who are accountable will be held accountable. I'm ready to move on.
Okay. Fair point. I retract or at least dial back some. But please judge not the entire board (and everyone who disagrees with you) based on the opinion and delivery of some of its characters...
We have characters on both sides (this is what makes life and Sowal great) so it all balances out in the end...
H, I wish you would put your Rove pic back. I never meant to censor you or make you look bad. Plus, it was kinda funny...
Sorry if I was defensive...
Last edited:
... insulting, irrelevant, and most of all total BS by BS. why the stinky attitude? its a news report about crooks. who cares.